i received these pics today from a buddy of mine. i must say that i dont know how legit they are, but man...if they are...WOA!!!

and dont ask me how come the bones are so nicely preserved if they are 5000-10 000 heck... 100 000 years old? i dont know...







what u guys think?








[edit on 11-6-2009 by GerhardSA]

[edit on 11-6-2009 by GerhardSA]

I've seen the middle picture before... I don't have a source but I think it was found in Indiana or something like that? I never found out what happened to the skeleton or if they were fake. I'm sure one of the more knowledgable ATSers here can clear up the fog

these are great photoshop contest pics from worth1000.com and has been circulating around on the web/net and has been disproved umpteen times.

some more...





well..thats why i posted...thanx for letting me know....thought this would be to good to be true

I've often wondered - the Bible records that antideluvian humans lived to be hundreds of years old. Would they still only grow to be 5-7ft tall? Would they not reach full height until age 200, or at age 200 be 12 feet tall?

Good to know it was cleared up pretty quick

If they were real pictures... those sure are some shallow graves. It would seem they would have been discovered a long time ago. Also... they look way more than 12 feet tall

welll if these pics are anything to go by...i guess they grow to a bit more than 12 ft

they must be fake...cause the last two pics have exaclty the same sceleton, down to the last little angle, in defferent graves!!!....hmm...probably twins....

The last pic has what looks like a 20ft long revolver by the right hand

These pics may be hoaxes but there have been skeletons of large size (8-20 feet) found all over the world, even in the United States. I'm sure there are posts on ATS about them somewhere.

Do some research before posting please. Its easily googled.

Awesome pics.... I thought they were real at first LOL.

They are very well done pics. But I wish they were real

i dono but some how the math presented in the bible is more a question of faith then reality.

people lived til they where 900years
(wich can be explaind that a year = month or full moon , simple math and fits our biological foot print somehow )

and now we have giants that are 3.7 (3733.33meters ) km tall ,

born from normal people they sprout and burst into growth about a ft or more a day if we say they live till the age of 40+ ,

he/she (the giant) would be more then size of a block at the age of 2 so clearly we´ve missinterpeted maths again and the presented fact is just bogus.

now 3.7m might be possible or a normal person to give birth to or even 33.7m but even im having hard with that a large number ,

so ill stick with 3.7m and claim that thouse that translated/wrote the bible had poor knowlege of math and that they just didnt know what they translated much like that of a babelfish translation or asian to english menu that read : sorched cow in cold apple. ?

my math might wrong with a couple of days or meters but still its withinn our biological footprint ,

a sertain story comes to mind abouta a tower call babel and how language became distorted ,

bibel = babel = bad translations on every level


,



z