AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

This topic is in the Ancient & Lost Civilizations discussion forum.  (rss)


Maybe Goliath was just a bit bigger than we think?


<<  1    2  >>

Topic started on 11-6-2009 @ 07:39 AM by GerhardSA


i received these pics today from a buddy of mine. i must say that i dont know how legit they are, but man...if they are...WOA!!!

and dont ask me how come the bones are so nicely preserved if they are 5000-10 000 heck... 100 000 years old? i dont know...







what u guys think?








[edit on 11-6-2009 by GerhardSA]

[edit on 11-6-2009 by GerhardSA]



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Ancient & Lost Civilizations topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 07:42 AM by Estharik


I've seen the middle picture before... I don't have a source but I think it was found in Indiana or something like that? I never found out what happened to the skeleton or if they were fake. I'm sure one of the more knowledgable ATSers here can clear up the fog



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 07:45 AM by coredrill


these are great photoshop contest pics from worth1000.com and has been circulating around on the web/net and has been disproved umpteen times.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 07:56 AM by GerhardSA


some more...





well..thats why i posted...thanx for letting me know....thought this would be to good to be true



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:02 AM by jjkenobi


I've often wondered - the Bible records that antideluvian humans lived to be hundreds of years old. Would they still only grow to be 5-7ft tall? Would they not reach full height until age 200, or at age 200 be 12 feet tall?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:05 AM by Estharik


Good to know it was cleared up pretty quick

If they were real pictures... those sure are some shallow graves. It would seem they would have been discovered a long time ago. Also... they look way more than 12 feet tall



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:06 AM by GerhardSA


welll if these pics are anything to go by...i guess they grow to a bit more than 12 ft



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:08 AM by GerhardSA


they must be fake...cause the last two pics have exaclty the same sceleton, down to the last little angle, in defferent graves!!!....hmm...probably twins....



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:15 AM by coredrill


these are hoaxes.

the same photograph is used here for a different news

giant hoax -1

giant hoax-2., with other giant hoax pics



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:20 AM by Anjin


The last pic has what looks like a 20ft long revolver by the right hand



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:30 AM by jjkenobi


These pics may be hoaxes but there have been skeletons of large size (8-20 feet) found all over the world, even in the United States. I'm sure there are posts on ATS about them somewhere.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:12 AM by postmeme


Do some research before posting please. Its easily googled.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 04:37 PM by Topsy_Cret


Awesome pics.... I thought they were real at first LOL.

They are very well done pics. But I wish they were real



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:12 PM by Sargoth


The first one was faked from what I've seen. Don't know about the others.
Here's some interesting videos on giants.

www.youtube.com...
www.stevequayle.com...
www.youtube.com...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:29 PM by randyvs


reply to post by GerhardSA


i only know the second picture is definetly not a fake. the first is a product
of nat geo? if that is true how could it be fake. when the bible says giants
you can take it literaly. it means giants. where go you think folklore comes
from. fairytales?
yes there were giants yes there are aliens yes thier connected.

[edit on 11-6-2009 by randyvs]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:35 PM by jd140


reply to post by randyvs



They are all fake.

I will say the same thing in 6 months when they make an appearance again.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:39 PM by RuneSpider


reply to post by jd140



Six months? Betcha it's even sooner.

There are multiple threads on these skeletons, where it's been shown exhaustively that they are from one site's challenge.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 10:52 PM by imd12c4funn


In the Book of Enich, CHAPTER VII

Verse 2 -

2. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells:


So, what is an Ell?

The measurement varies.

Here, is an Ell converter tto cm. and inches
www.answers.com...

Using this calculator, 3000 Ells equals

135,000 inches,

or 11,200 feet

That would be one tall giant.

The Ell can varie from 16.85 inches to 45 inches, that I have found.

In biblical times, the scattering of tribes and countries could result in many unknown variations of the Ell measurement as well, leaving the conversion standard far from rigid.

More Ell info

www.answers.com...
dictionary.reference.com...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

Could you imagine giants as tall as high-rise buildings?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 11:29 PM by zerbot565


i dono but some how the math presented in the bible is more a question of faith then reality.

people lived til they where 900years
(wich can be explaind that a year = month or full moon , simple math and fits our biological foot print somehow )

and now we have giants that are 3.7 (3733.33meters ) km tall ,

born from normal people they sprout and burst into growth about a ft or more a day if we say they live till the age of 40+ ,

he/she (the giant) would be more then size of a block at the age of 2 so clearly we´ve missinterpeted maths again and the presented fact is just bogus.

now 3.7m might be possible or a normal person to give birth to or even 33.7m but even im having hard with that a large number ,

so ill stick with 3.7m and claim that thouse that translated/wrote the bible had poor knowlege of math and that they just didnt know what they translated much like that of a babelfish translation or asian to english menu that read : sorched cow in cold apple. ?

my math might wrong with a couple of days or meters but still its withinn our biological footprint ,

a sertain story comes to mind abouta a tower call babel and how language became distorted ,

bibel = babel = bad translations on every level


,



z



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 11:38 PM by jd140


Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to post by jd140



Six months? Betcha it's even sooner.

There are multiple threads on these skeletons, where it's been shown exhaustively that they are from one site's challenge.


Eh you are probably right. One could hope though, right?



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>
































































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.114 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.