It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Maybe Goliath was just a bit bigger than we think?

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 07:39 AM
link   
i received these pics today from a buddy of mine. i must say that i dont know how legit they are, but man...if they are...WOA!!!

and dont ask me how come the bones are so nicely preserved if they are 5000-10 000 heck... 100 000 years old? i dont know...







what u guys think?








[edit on 11-6-2009 by GerhardSA]

[edit on 11-6-2009 by GerhardSA]




posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 07:42 AM
link   
I've seen the middle picture before... I don't have a source but I think it was found in Indiana or something like that? I never found out what happened to the skeleton or if they were fake. I'm sure one of the more knowledgable ATSers here can clear up the fog



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 07:45 AM
link   
these are great photoshop contest pics from worth1000.com and has been circulating around on the web/net and has been disproved umpteen times.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 07:56 AM
link   
some more...





well..thats why i posted...thanx for letting me know....thought this would be to good to be true



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 08:02 AM
link   
I've often wondered - the Bible records that antideluvian humans lived to be hundreds of years old. Would they still only grow to be 5-7ft tall? Would they not reach full height until age 200, or at age 200 be 12 feet tall?



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 08:05 AM
link   
Good to know it was cleared up pretty quick


If they were real pictures... those sure are some shallow graves. It would seem they would have been discovered a long time ago. Also... they look way more than 12 feet tall



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 08:06 AM
link   
welll if these pics are anything to go by...i guess they grow to a bit more than 12 ft



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 08:08 AM
link   
they must be fake...cause the last two pics have exaclty the same sceleton, down to the last little angle, in defferent graves!!!....hmm...probably twins....



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 08:15 AM
link   
these are hoaxes.

the same photograph is used here for a different news

giant hoax -1

giant hoax-2., with other giant hoax pics



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 08:20 AM
link   
The last pic has what looks like a 20ft long revolver by the right hand



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 08:30 AM
link   
These pics may be hoaxes but there have been skeletons of large size (8-20 feet) found all over the world, even in the United States. I'm sure there are posts on ATS about them somewhere.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 09:12 AM
link   
Do some research before posting please. Its easily googled.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 04:37 PM
link   
Awesome pics.... I thought they were real at first LOL.

They are very well done pics. But I wish they were real



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 09:12 PM
link   
The first one was faked from what I've seen. Don't know about the others.
Here's some interesting videos on giants.

www.youtube.com...
www.stevequayle.com...
www.youtube.com...



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 09:29 PM
link   
reply to post by GerhardSA
 

i only know the second picture is definetly not a fake. the first is a product
of nat geo? if that is true how could it be fake. when the bible says giants
you can take it literaly. it means giants. where go you think folklore comes
from. fairytales?
yes there were giants yes there are aliens yes thier connected.

[edit on 11-6-2009 by randyvs]



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 09:35 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


They are all fake.

I will say the same thing in 6 months when they make an appearance again.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by jd140
 


Six months? Betcha it's even sooner.

There are multiple threads on these skeletons, where it's been shown exhaustively that they are from one site's challenge.



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 10:52 PM
link   
In the Book of Enich, CHAPTER VII

Verse 2 -


2. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells:


So, what is an Ell?

The measurement varies.

Here, is an Ell converter tto cm. and inches
www.answers.com...

Using this calculator, 3000 Ells equals

135,000 inches,

or 11,200 feet

That would be one tall giant.

The Ell can varie from 16.85 inches to 45 inches, that I have found.

In biblical times, the scattering of tribes and countries could result in many unknown variations of the Ell measurement as well, leaving the conversion standard far from rigid.

More Ell info

www.answers.com...
dictionary.reference.com...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

Could you imagine giants as tall as high-rise buildings?



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 11:29 PM
link   
i dono but some how the math presented in the bible is more a question of faith then reality.

people lived til they where 900years
(wich can be explaind that a year = month or full moon , simple math and fits our biological foot print somehow )

and now we have giants that are 3.7 (3733.33meters ) km tall ,

born from normal people they sprout and burst into growth about a ft or more a day if we say they live till the age of 40+ ,

he/she (the giant) would be more then size of a block at the age of 2 so clearly we´ve missinterpeted maths again and the presented fact is just bogus.

now 3.7m might be possible or a normal person to give birth to or even 33.7m but even im having hard with that a large number ,

so ill stick with 3.7m and claim that thouse that translated/wrote the bible had poor knowlege of math and that they just didnt know what they translated much like that of a babelfish translation or asian to english menu that read : sorched cow in cold apple. ?

my math might wrong with a couple of days or meters but still its withinn our biological footprint ,

a sertain story comes to mind abouta a tower call babel and how language became distorted ,

bibel = babel = bad translations on every level


,



z



posted on Jun, 11 2009 @ 11:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to post by jd140
 


Six months? Betcha it's even sooner.

There are multiple threads on these skeletons, where it's been shown exhaustively that they are from one site's challenge.


Eh you are probably right. One could hope though, right?



new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join