Miranda Rights for Terrorists, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 07:15 AM by Harlequin
reply to post by jsobecky



POW`s might not have the `right to an attorney` but they have rights under the geneva conventions


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 07:35 AM by jsobecky
reply to post by Harlequin



I'm not debating that. But Miranda gives them additional rights over and above Geneva. That's the crux of the issue here.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 08:54 AM by rcwj75
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION......might as well be changed to THE WORLD WIDE CONSTITUTION! Anyone these days from ANYWHERE when caught doing something claims to have or demands rights from this peice of paper. And the worst part is we have retards who live in this country who believe this is acceptable and are NOT smart enough to see that when you forward OUR rights to all, you might as well dissolve AMERICA itself, because what benefits do we have that protects us???? NOTHING...we are no different then some scumbag who blows up 1000 people and dances in the streets about it.

We have thousands of soldiers 6 feet deep who fought for the rights of the constitution. From the revolution up to today we have people willing to sacrifice it all to make sure their families and friends are protected and have THEIR RIGHTS in place to enjoy as much freedom as they can....NOT FIGHT AND DIE SO SOME SCUMBAG WHO IS NOT A CITIZEN..gets the EXACT same rights! It's pathetic....and if you don't see or get that you cannot be very smart and you definitly don't live in the reality this world is.

With that, so now my tax dollars are going to go to paying for the trials of these aholes, then what...oh I get to work my job, work overtime, bust my ass so I can give MY money to feeding, medicating, clothing, these POS... Some of you need to get of your couches, get of your asses, and go see the world and see REALITY...instead of THINKING you know what actually goes on out there. Its SOOOOOO obvious that MANY of you have never dealt with the realities this world has, but you will spew crap about stuff because you have nothing in the way of experiance...instead all of your words come from watching the news or from your bleeding hearts....again..get off your butts and go see the TRUTH...then come back and respond to these posts...trust me, your demeanor and thought process will have changed!!!

PS: To the members who really aren't up to speed on common sense...the people our military detain aren't just picked up because they looked at someone wrong....there are THOUSANDS of terrorists, and combatants, and we took a few hundred into custody...why because they are people of interest...god you people are just...


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:34 AM by rcwj75
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck



See you confuse your definition of "criminal" with these combatants. They are not shoplifters, or drunk drivers. As I said, those of you without ANY true experiance in this can't see the difference. Once you can, you can EASILY see they should be treated differently.

Imagine catching a guy you KNOW is helping plot a bombing...he has all the info you need to stop the murder of 100 people. You catch him and he says..I WANT A LAWYER..so now he doesnt have to talk, you can't make him talk, and 100 people get blown up and killed while this guy laughs in the face of OUR WAY of doing things...sits in a jail cell...gets fed, medical attention,. then gets his day in court...is tried, and convicted of????? NOT MURDER of 100 people...WAY TO GO!!!!!

You just don't get it....


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:42 AM by MOFreemason
reply to post by rcwj75



You do raise the single-most important issue of offering Miranda rights--the "right to remain silent."

But, in order for them to be prosecuted under the U.S. Court System, this is required by law.

We must be EXTREMELY, EXTREMELY careful to not void a "terrorist" of the Miranda Rights. I don't want to keep drumming up panic, but it will not be long before "domestic terrorists" are sought after with the same ferocity as "international terrorists."

We have to be very, very cautious what we as Americans are advocating for.

Stick to the tenets of the United States Consitution everybody. It is the Supreme Law of our land. Not our emotions and intutions.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:47 AM by HunkaHunka
reply to post by MOFreemason



Thanks MOF, I couldn't agree more!



Terrorist != foreigner as the OP would like us to believe...


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:49 AM by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by rcwj75
reply to
post by JohnnyCanuck



See you confuse your definition of "criminal" with these combatants. They are not shoplifters, or drunk drivers.


It's war. If you don't want to play by those rules, then you play by the rules of the criminal justice system. Either way there are rules, and quite frankly, those rules are the sum total of the difference between 'us' and 'them'.

You seem like a bright enough lad...you do the math.



reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 09:59 AM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by HunkaHunka



Foreign Nationalist != American Citizen.

If you are an American Citizen then you will have the right afforded under the Constitution.

It amazes me the people that say we shouldn't police world and this and that, but yet want to give American rights to people of other nationalities.

The logic just isn't there. Our forefathers died fighting to start this country, and if other people of other nationalities want those same rights as American citizens then they need to fight for their own freedom in their own countries.

Seriously can you not see this is all part of Globalization?


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 10:13 AM by richierich
.
You are acting like a typical liberal. You react and make decisions based on emotion instead of logic and the law. This is not a good trait.

What's the point of having a U.S. Constitution for Americans if we are going to apply it to everyone? Might as well rip it up.

What does miranda rights have to do with Guantanamo and your wrong opinion of having wrongfully accused innocent terrorists? Answer: Nothing!


What??!! Ifwe do NOT apply it to everyone, then it is worthless! How can someone not see this? it astounds me that anyone could see the protections we must have for a fair system denied to anyone. If the USA arrests someone , then the USA must afford them a fair trial. And nothing is fair about NOT warning a defendant about his rights.

Where in the Constitution does it say: " Only for those who have a green card or were born here".? No where. Of COURSE we must give the required legal warnings to someone we are about to charge and try in a court...if we do not then that says a lot about us not trusting our own system.

I cannot believe that so many people would object to telling someone that what they say can be sued against them. How does that undermine us? It does NOT! It cannot. It only shows the world that we are NOT the rouge element that tortures and denies basic human rights, as was done under Bush the Scum and Darth Cheney.

"Terrorists' are nothing more than people snatched up in a foreign land, dragged under inhumane conditions to cages to sit for years while the USA pretends it has a case against them. If there IS a case, then surely it can be tried normally ina court. If there is NO case, then why on earth would any civilized human being want another human being to suffer forever in a cage because the USA was too embarrassed to admit it is wrong?

No person can be deprived of their liberty or life without DUE PROCESS, which includes Miranda...THAT is what the Constitution says. Either throw the Constitution out or follow it...but do not weep and wail because some probable innocent vicitm of CIA nonsense gets a fair trial.

MOST, about 85%, of all detainees were brought there because of some accusation that had NO MERIT. People were sold out for cash....falsely accused by others or were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. How can anyone with a shred of decency deny anyone a fair trial and all the protections that we enjoy? it is madness to suggest that we can be seen as decent and fair when we deny basic rights.

Try them in open court or let them go home. Anything else is a sickening example of a fascist system with zero fairness. Now that Bush and his sick cabal are gone maybe we can heal the wounds that they caused both in this nation and worldwide.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 10:27 AM by HunkaHunka
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
reply to
post by HunkaHunka



Foreign Nationalist != American Citizen.



The phrase "Terrorists are now being read miranda rights" presumes that all terrorists are foreign nationals...

And our rights, are "INALIENABLE" which means they don't have a border... they are given to us by the creator... that's it.



If you are an American Citizen then you will have the right afforded under the Constitution.



No... the constitution does not simply apply to it's citizens... it applies to mankind...

How does that go again..

"We hold these truths to be self evident, that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL AND ENDOWED WITH CERTAIN INALIENABLE RIGHTS"

READ READ READ... We are not a primitive bunch of Cherokee who believe their rules only apply to the "REAL PEOPLE" (meaning themselves). We are a CIVILIZED nation.




It amazes me the people that say we shouldn't police world and this and that, but yet want to give American rights to people of other nationalities.



Because those rights are considered INALIENABLE... now I don't have a beef with us using force in the world where we feel human rights are being violated.

In fact I think we should be in Darfur right now...



The logic just isn't there. Our forefathers died fighting to start this country, and if other people of other nationalities want those same rights as American citizens then they need to fight for their own freedom in their own countries.



The founding fathers first argued to the Crown that these rights were given to them and all men regardless of country affiliation...

It was only when that argument was said to be bunk, like you are saying now, that the founding fathers took up arms...



Seriously can you not see this is all part of Globalization?


And what is wrong with that?

[edit on 11-6-2009 by HunkaHunka]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 17 hours ago, 117 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 12 hours ago, 99 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 64 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 60 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies