Miranda Rights for Terrorists, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 10-6-2009 @ 02:40 PM by WhatTheory

Miranda Rights for Terrorists


www.weeklystandard.com
the Obama Justice Department has quietly ordered FBI agents to read Miranda rights to high value detainees captured and held at U.S. detention facilities in Afghanistan, according a senior Republican on the House Intelligence Committee. “The administration has decided to change the focus to law enforcement. Here’s the problem. You have foreign fighters who are targeting US troops today – foreign fighters who go to another country to kill Americans. We capture them…and they’re reading them their rights – Mirandizing these foreign fighters,” says Representative Mike Rogers, who rec
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 10-6-2009 @ 05:20 PM by greeneyedleo
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Given the fact that we've wrongfully accused innocent people of being terrorists, and after all this Guantanamo nonsense... I'm going to go ahead as token liberal to say- this is a good idea.



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.


The Miranda rights are protecting American citizen's constitutional rights. Not sure how that would cover a foreign person taken into custody on foreign land during a "war".

On top of the fact, they are not US citizens protected under the US Constitution.....

Here is a perfect example of why this would not work:


The problem is you take that guy at three in the morning off of a compound right outside of Kabul where he’s building bomb materials to kill US soldiers, and read him his rights by four, and the Red Cross is saying take the lawyer – you have now created quite a confusion amongst the FBI, the CIA and the United States military. And confusion is the last thing you want in a combat zone.”
stopsocialism.wordpress.com...


These are not some DUI stops in the wee mornings on New Years Eve. These are people taken into custody on a battlefield - people who are not sitting around knitting sweaters for their kids. Many times there is no time to stand around asking questions and whether or not they want to contact their lawyer. And do we really want these people shutting up? They may have information that could save the lives of our soldiers over there.

Sorry, I will never support this. Bad idea! And they are not covered under our Constitution!



As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.


[edit on 6/10/2009 by greeneyedleo]


reply posted on 10-6-2009 @ 06:36 PM by centurion1211
reply to post by mystiq



*gently removes mystiq's rose-colored glasses for her*

Sorry to have to do that, but perhaps now you can see the world as it really is.

There are still way too many people in the world that would love to kill you for almost any reason, or even no reason to start forming circles, holding hands and singing "kumbayah".

Someday, maybe. A couple of lives from now ...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags