posted on Jun, 10 2009 @ 12:58 PM
reply to post by whiskeypoet
I don't really care about 'disclosure.' The implication is that who or whatever Government has known something about aliens and UFOs since
the late 40s. This means that some people have been withholding information for decades. I'm a grown-up and can understand that there may be damn
good reasons for the silence. I can also accept that there isn't anything to 'disclose.'
By extension, if there IS anything to disclose, it will come from the same interests that have withheld the information for decades. If people don't
believe them now...why believe them if they 'disclose?' Whatever would be disclosed would be wide open to interpretation and question. Who's to
I'm 100% convinced that there's maybe a possibility that a minority of UFOs are not of this Earth. Of that minority, some of them might be examples
of ET. Colares 1977
and some of the classics (Gorman, Hudson Valley, Malmstrom, Nellis
AFB, JAL flight etc) are pretty persuasive.
'Disclosure' is some fairytale BS people keep yacking about. It's associated with free energy, freedom, 'higher vibrations (WTF?!)' and spiritual
make-believe. For me, I say screw the front-page news stories. Provide an international consensus of scientific research and evidence and I'll
believe it. Without the science, it's a tale told by an idiot, signifying nothing (credit to WS)