New Tax Nightmare: Obama pitches pay-as-you-go plan for Congress , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 9-6-2009 @ 12:13 PM by LeaderOfProgress
AP News Source.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama is calling for Congress to pay for new increases to federal benefit programs such as health care by raising taxes or coming up with budget cuts - a "pay-as-you-go" system that would have the force of law.

The "PAYGO" plan would also require future tax cuts to be financed by tax increases elsewhere in the code, though exceptions are made for extending President George W. Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, as well as other tax cuts that are scheduled to expire.


If I am reading this correctly then what they are saying is that there will be no more tax breaks or levying of taxes. If they remove a tax then they will place a new one. What is real interesting about this is that there is no mention of the creation of new taxes. What it looks like to me is they can create any kind of new tax they want but cannot eliminate any, just rename the tax.

This is another outrageous law being pushed by this crappy administration that will only hurt the people.



[edit on 9-6-2009 by LeaderOfProgress]


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 06:01 PM by LeaderOfProgress
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman



What you said is what I said. I'm confused on your statement that I wasn't reading it correctly.



reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 06:09 PM by Iamonlyhuman
Originally posted by LeaderOfProgress
reply to
post by Iamonlyhuman



What you said is what I said. I'm confused on your statement that I wasn't reading it correctly.


If I am reading this correctly then what they are saying is that there will be no more tax breaks or levying of taxes.


There will be much, much, much more levying of taxes. Every act of Congress that has a cost will be offset by the levying of taxes.


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 06:17 PM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman



Isn't great? I love peachy sounding rhetoric that bares absolutely no meaning in real life.

The sad part about all this is if they re-instate PAYGO people are just going to vote the republicans back in.

I swear we have turned into a country of schizophrenics.


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 06:19 PM by David9176
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife





The sad part about all this is if they re-instate PAYGO people are just going to vote the republicans back in.


And the cycle just continues to repeat, and no new ground is ever made..all at the expense of American workers!

Looking forward to a neo-con president in 2012! Yippie.

Cripes.


reply posted on 10-6-2009 @ 09:45 AM by habu71
reply to post by Anjin



I think you are right.....There will be a provision slipped into another bill that will remove the term limits for the president. Then, as 2012 approaches, a national economic emergency will be declared and congress will "present" the people with a COG (continuity of government) plan (probably led by a continuity czar) that will keep the muslim-in-chief in office indefinitely.


reply posted on 11-6-2009 @ 05:26 PM by Sestias
I may be the only person on ATS that hasn't minded paying my income taxes. But then, my income taxes are on the way down slightly.

What Bush did was cut taxes on the rich and then borrow money to keep the country going. He did this to the tune of trillions. With that and the war in Iraq, he is the primary one responsible for the huge debt we're in now.

The deficit run up by the Obama administration was to rescue the economy from the worst depression since the 1930's. Most responsible economists agree with what he has done. It will take time to know for sure but to all appearances the stimulus is beginning to work.

Not that Obama will get any thanks from the likes of most of you. You'll just decide that the recovery just happened all by itself.

Obama's "pay as you go" policy is reasonable and responsible. After the regrettable but necessary stimulus it is important that we as a country do not increase the deficit through tax cuts to the people who can most easily pay their taxes.

I guess most of the people who have responded to this thread are the very rich who will have to pay a little tax increase. And not even all the rich object to them. Warren Buffet has admitted that his secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does. Not to mention the fact that the very rich have tax lawyers who do nothing except find loopholes and tax shelters for them. They'll get through a little tax increase without dying I'm sure.

I have no gripe with most rich people. But I think it's time for them to step up to the plate and begin to even come close to paying the tax rate that the middle class has shouldered for so long.

The days of worshipping the rich as many ATSers and almost all Republicans have been doing are drawing to a close. We now have an administration that is responsive to the needs and hopes of ordinary Americans.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^