It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


UFO propulsion theory?

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 09:01 PM

Originally posted by karl 12

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
If you can make the air conduct electricity you might be able
to move around in the atmosphere.
That's the secret to UFO propulsion.

T+L thats an interesting one.

Any ideas why they seem to like water?

Water perhaps has more available charge carriers but its the
atomic nature of them workings like the forces of bar magnets but
the field is not magnetic but electric.

There is a description of the propulsion as being pulled up or pulled
side to side for fore and aft propulsion.

Further descriptions have led to an influx of charges or just the
power of ether waves cause by the mechanical pressure caused
by pulsed electrical forces. Water is disrupted as if by pulsing
a bar magnet the pressure would make waves in the water.
Well the electrical pulses cause the water to react.

Something we will not see how electricity causes mechanical action
but we only see it in UFO propulsion. This action is the same as
wireless power and you do not see that either.
The man who man the first radio controlled boat was also powered
wireless. This is quite a hidden technology.

ED: As if a bar magnet was so powerful the force on any object
was obtained. However the method is from a coil with one end
wire not connected so the pressure ether waves are given off.

[edit on 10/16/2009 by TeslaandLyne]

posted on Oct, 18 2009 @ 07:51 AM

Originally posted by mbkennel
reply to post by BASSPLYR

The problem with this "electrogravitic" theory is that us humans have been making high-powered microwaves in all sorts of configurations since about 1940.

And there's been no gravitational effect seen anywhere. If this physics was just E&M we'd have seen SOME effect in something.

Gravitational manipulation means bending light in vacuum.

Curious. Why do you think gravity manipulation involves bending light in a vacuum? Flip the script... We've been making high-powered light in all sorts of configurations since before the 1940s, and there's been no gravitational effect seen anywhere, (well not to the degree of overcoming gravity like we think of).

Honestly though, just like any other engine we have, those exotic 'propulsion system(s)' would require more than just microwaves (or EM waves in general) in the configuration to function. Heck, basic natural fire requires fuel, oxygen, sufficient heat, (if you don't suffice all of those things, it ain't gonna work)... and we do a hell of a lot with that including mechanically simple to advanced propulsion systems of all kinds.

So we really shouldn't assume all configurations of EM energy have been tried thoroughly. Many have probably stumbled onto the right configuration by accident without realizing and dismissed it as a fluke because it didn't fit conventional theory. Many discoveries have been made by fluke, it is when the observer/experimenter realizes what they have just witnessed/experienced that a discovery is made.

But please, could you elaborate on the light propulsion idea?

posted on Oct, 20 2009 @ 01:54 AM
How about a description from the inventor as a force from
above that will hold up the craft and a forward or backward force
will carry the craft forward or backward.

Since scalar waves or pressure waves in the ether are used
by Tesla, there must be charges to lift up the craft.
Electricity so powerful the physical force is delivered to the ship.
Bar magnet like forces but in pure ether.

The way to suppress the UFO propulsion technology is to lock up
Tesla's papers and hardware, say there is no ether, never show
how pressure waves are made, thus never have true wireless
power and skip the truth about Tesla and propagandize just
about anything else.

posted on Oct, 23 2009 @ 12:18 AM
If there is an electrical source of gravity, electric pressure waves,
that would make anti gravity a reverse electrical process.

I wonder if an electrostatic theory can be made for propeller
and rocket propulsion.

We would have to be held down by electrical pressure waves
then and quite possible be levitated if we were to reverse the poles.

new topics

top topics
<< 1  2   >>

log in