First 747-400 heads for wrecker, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 9-6-2009 @ 07:40 AM by Harlequin
www.stuff.co.nz...

Air New Zealand's first Boeing 747-400 will soon make one final flight to a wrecker's yard as further capacity cuts loom in the face of a continued fall in demand for global air travel.

The 19-year-old jumbo, named The Bay of Islands, was grounded and put up for sale after completing Air New Zealand's historic biofuel test flight in December


it seems all the major airlines are offloading the boeing 4 engined aircraft now . i know BA are looking at ditching them far quicker than they first thought, and its a sign of the times , when the replacement - the 747-8i can only manage 20 orders.

twins are cheaper to operate and until the AF447 flight had an amazing over water flight record.


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 12:52 PM by BSG75
reply to post by Now_Then



Simple... fit it with engines that will take Bio-Fuel.

It is the best Aircraft that ever took to the skies along with the F14, Spitfire/Seafire, Hurricane and DC3.

I do like the 747, and do think that it a Beautiful aircraft... perhaps we can all club together and start "ATS Aircraft services"?


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 02:43 PM by Harlequin
reply to post by Now_Then



theres only 2 left anyway - 1 in toulouse , that *could* be serviceable with ALOT of money , and 1 in the UK that looks pretty but has no engines.

or fluids in her for 10 years

and the tyres are craked up

so no concord will not fly again.


reply posted on 16-6-2009 @ 02:52 PM by BSG75
reply to post by Harlequin



I think you will find that they are more then one still around. Several are in the UK, one/two in america and one in barbados.


reply posted on 17-6-2009 @ 10:39 PM by FredT
reply to post by BSG75



I have to agree with Harlequin here. The Concord will not fly again. Its not just a matter of fueling the sucker up and putting it back into revenue flights. The airframe would basically have to have a total teardown and rebuild. Many if not all of the spare parts are gone so they would have to be retolled from scratch. You would have to retrain a cadre of pilots and flight crews to fly the aircraft again.

Biofuel at this stage does not offer much in the way of savings either and they would be better off using standard fuel rather than qualify the Olympis (sp) engines on biofuel.

The point is could you do it? Sure but it would never be cost effective.

[edit on 6/17/09 by FredT]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 17 days ago with 0 member flags