THOMAS MITCHELL: Subpoena seeks names -- and lots more -- of Web posters, page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times

Topic started on 8-6-2009 @ 03:09 PM by N3krostatic

reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 05:06 PM by shanerz

That is sad when you can be held accountable for whats going on in your mind, yet they force us to pay our water bills, which are effectively poisoning every man, woman and child around us.

They poison, I can't speak. LOL This world would be so much better off if something happened to whoever makes these rules up, like if they died or something. In fact, I hope they do.

*had to add:

Not only what I had said, but:

Free speech should be practiced only by those who are ready to deal with the consequences

Isn't this a rather contradicting statement? Whoever postulated this idea this is needs to get back on his meds. Crackpots.

[edit on 8-6-2009 by shanerz]

reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 05:33 PM by exile1981

reply to post by N3krostatic

I not surprised one bit. Depending on the comments (which I haven't looked at) there could be an admission of a crime or a threat of a crime. I can see the judge asking for all the records so as to not tip off the one they are looking for, but I still think it's a bit of an invasion of privacy.

I tell people that a facebook page (or any online stuff) is never secret and that you should never post stuff on line that you would not be proud of saying 50 years from now.

Would you want your kids to know about your sexual exploits?
Would you want a spouse/employeer/family to know you committed a crime or have an STD?
Assume someone is always recording or watching what you write down.

Last word of advice if you are stupid enough to have an affair and then deny it during the divorce proceedings; you shouldn't put the names of the men you had the affairs with and rate thier sexual performance on your public blog. if you do then it will be evidence and someone may just forward the link to your mom.

reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 05:39 PM by N3krostatic

reply to post by shanerz

Agreed. Even though I don't want to admit it, with the state of the world and everything else we all seem to be approaching a breaking point of control or revolution.

Everything adds up and this, if even a example, shows how things seem to be headed.

[edit on 8-6-2009 by N3krostatic]

reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 06:22 PM by shanerz

reply to post by N3krostatic

I've heard it been said by a few history major friends and family, "This is the stuff revolutions are made of."

I think, should it keep building, whether it will be peaceful or not is definitely up to those who keep oppressing. The amount of LEA power misuse proof being spread nowdays, I can definitely see some people believing the only road to true justice is in their own hands. Job loss, socialization (Mussolini said something about Fascism being called corporatism, when gov. and corporations become one - Arguably whats happening today with CEOs being laid off/government ownership lol?), Patriot Act coupled with DHS Codex, gun control, now this... Amendments 5 to 1 in order, with attacks on others, especially 10 from Sotomayor, along the way.

Yeah... I can see what they are talking about.

LATE EDIT: Strike 2 to the first Amendment.

[edit on 8-6-2009 by shanerz]

[edit on 9-6-2009 by shanerz]

Pages: ^^TOP^^