Originally posted by mrmonsoon
They were removed, voted out because the people of Lebanon are sick of those terrorists causing wars and distroying their country.
Hi again Monsoon,
They were not 'removed' and while the people of Lebanon are as sick of war and terrorism as everyone else on the planet they also live there and
understand who is protecting them and who are invading and bombing them.
There is no rigging as you claim, removing armed terrorists, or at least their arms is necessary for peace, clearly the people of Lebanon see
what you don't or can't.
I didn't say there were election rigging in this case. What i suggested is that the people of Lebanon need all the economic aid they can get and the
fact that the US threatened to cut them off in no way made the process more democratic. As for removing people's weapons i should probably remind
you that the founding fathers and their supporters where 'terrorist' too not so many centuries ago. In fact the wish to disarm others is exactly why
Lebanese and resistance/liberation movements all over the world will keep on fighting to maintain their means of self defense.
You are so painfully ignorant on the next point it hurts.
England gave the land to the UN.
It was not England's land to give to anyone but to those they originally took it from ( meaning the people who lived there) so yes, strange that you
support those who stole the land over those who are still fighting to hand on to the last bits of it.
The UN created modern Israel.
(read a history book dude, seriously)
No, the League of nations 'granted' Britain the 'mandate' ( because back then imperialist still tossed pieces of land around as if no one lived
there) of PALESTINE. This is what the "mandate' ( as written by the league which were by no means impartial) called upon Britain to do:
The UN came into it a bit later and they didn't 'create' modern Israel either. Modern Israel created itself by declaring independence ( breaking
the UN agreements that allowed their presence there) and then surviving the attack that was bound to result from this land grab.
You even accidently told the truth, Hezbolla are the lapdogs of Iran and Syria.
They don't care one bit about the people in Lebanon.
They are not the 'lapdogs' as these people are Lebanese first and foremost and took aid from those who are willing to finance their aims. Admittedly
movements who gain such aid may become corrupted to serve a exclusive outside interest but as far as i can see Lebanese are still mostly fighting for
what they believe to be best for Lebanon,; not Iran or Syria. But that's my view and i am biased when it comes to Israel and their terribly
destablizing presence in the area.
They only care about their suicidal drive to kill all jews
Actually it's not about Jews but about fighting the radical zionism that led to the creation of the state of Israel. You confuse a hatred of zionism
with a hatred of jewish people in general when they are in fact two very seperate things. Admittedly it serves the Zionist to claim that attacks
against them are attacks against all Jewish people but then yes, that's what i would have done if i had wanted to steal land, expel it's people and
create my own little apartheid state.
they don't care who dies or what is destroyed in their animal move to murder.
You watch too many movies and believe too much propaganda. Don't let your prejudice against muslims in general turn you into the raving fanatic you
are emulating here.
The only thing Hezbolla has achieved is the destruction of large parts of Lebanon.
Right, something that would have been possible without the presence of Israel in Lebanon; in fact a presence that led to the formation of Hezbollah!
Isn't it ironic how imperialist states creates their nemesis time and time again? Blameless the 'country' that bombs a minority of it's own with
aircraft and howitzers. Yes, it's all Hezbolla....
[edit on 10-6-2009 by StellarX]