Obama says not to question the official story of 9-11., page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 46 times


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 07:40 AM by Jackal2099
re Obama, he seems to be endorsing similar policies to the last administration. Whatever. Blue or Green. Black or White. Red or Yellow. Butter or I-Can't-Believe-It's-Not-Butter. Red pill or Blue pill. Republican or Democrat. More and more this seems just like the illusion of choice. How come no-one ever suggests a third alternative, or perhaps even throwing out the whole system and staring again?

re 911, I came across some interesting facts just recently. They come from a guy called Dimitri Khalezov. He says he was with the Russian forces that watched over their nuclear arsenal. He's just released a book that shows a great deal of interesting information about what happened on 9/11 2001, and at several other related incidents.

In essence, he pupports to outline with a series of well presented facts about the nuclear explosions related to these events.

I just read through the download he made available relating to the Bali bombing of 2002. Being an Aussie this interested me especially.

The arguments are coherent and well presented. (Although I dislike reading off a computer screen.) The pictures are relevant and serve to provide excellent illustration of the points.

I'd recommend looking through it. The first half of the 56p document explains all about nukes, explosions, and 'mini-nukes'. The terminology is not dumbed down, but is simple enough that me (a non-scientist) could follow it on a first read-through.

The second half of the download goes through the events, blast damages, and injuries sustained by the Bali bombing, and then goes on to outline why these things demonstrate the nuclear nature of the blast.

I hadn't thought about the attack as being nuclear previously, but the arguments and evidence presented are very convincing.

The link to the author's site is...
www.3truth911.com

Whatever commercial links there are can be followed from there.


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 06:40 PM by redhead57
reply to post by Eight



Great video, that is one that I had not seen before thanks very much.



reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 07:15 PM by smurfy
reply to post by humilisunus

Hold on now,
Obama words were Al Quieda,not Muslims so you should not
Equate the two, and especially since it is a popular belief that
Al Quieda is a CIA invention.What is Obama actually saying then?
He has to be saying,(if you believe the CIA connection)
Go get the CIA and sort them out.
Your post is contradictory as far as conspiracy theory is concerned,
and is implicit against a religious group as a whole.


reply posted on 10-6-2009 @ 05:52 PM by sandman658
Maybe him and Bush are right?



Originally posted by Frankidealist35
I just saw this video and it creeps me out.


Who does this sound eerily reminiscent of?

I'm kind of spooked now. I never thought he would go down the same path as Bush. Barack Obama really is the same as Bush. He just looks different and sounds more articulate so people believe him more.



reply posted on 10-6-2009 @ 08:20 PM by Eight
reply to post by redhead57



I was amazed how everything and everybody is connected. All I ask is that you share the video. People need to know, part 7 is the most telling.


[edit on 10-6-2009 by Eight]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags