It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Here it is, on the Media AboveTopSecret portal, in PDF version.
TAPE NUMBER: 611854 TITLE: STS-75 Orbit 118, 119 (Downlink Reel # 061)
CAPTION: Night pass starfield views and TSS-1R visible from the orbiter. A/G audio.
STS-75 ORBITER VIDEO CAMERA IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION
1) Closed Circuit TV Payload Bay Cameras
A - PORT FWD Corner, Wide Angle Color Lens
B - PORT Aft Corner, Wide Angle Color Lens
C - STBD Aft Corner, B & W Lens
D - STBD FWD Corner, B&W Lens
Originally posted by easynow
hey ArMaP what do you think about that document ? i'm finding that it's missing so much info it's almost worthless.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by depthoffield
So nothing about water dump ice. Sp are you now willing to admit this is not ice from a water dump?
If there had been a water dump, you would think that they wouldn't identify that as debri.
Originally posted by depthoffield
Now, it doesn't matter there was a water dump, a waste dump, or even thermal stress due sunrise making debris (see the study!). All, or any of this, if confirmed, could identify the composition of the particles seen as discs.
But the bokeh discs are direct confirmation that there were small and near particles, making together part of the environment of the shuttle. This (bokeh) is a fact derived from observational data and how optics works. Simple and clear.
No disc is huge and behind the tether. Sereda & Co loses this argument even from the start, but they will lose more of their credibility if ever they will accept this. They choosed to go on the pareidolia-side (look, it goes behind the tether), to be convincing in the eyes of their target audience. Therefore, they will do anything to obfuscate and dismiss this simple solution which comes from people which are NOT their target audience. Remember their dismissals accross the time:
-small and close can't be seen using a telephoto-lens (yes, right..)
-water dump particles dissapear instantaneously or very fast (partially true when addressing very small particles , but wrong because it dismisses the greater ones)
-there was no water dump possible at that time because of some experiments (yet, the reports said that during the time of this filmings, 29 feb, the senzitive experiments where delayed: www.abovetopsecret.com... )
- the objects where invisible, because were filmed with a special camera named TOP in ultraviolet. (wrong, all the signs and behaviour, says that was filmed by an ordinary low-light shuttle bay camera remote operated)
- water dump solution is a ridiculous solution (no kidding?)
- the movements of the objects are very strange, curved, changing direction (in orbital terms, they are not strange..more you know about orbital environment, more the strangeness dissapears)
- people which propose and argument debris solution are "Jim Obergs' puppets", spammers, talking non-sense whatever. Make allusions to this people as closed minded etc.
- NASA is lying, therefore what astronauts (even direct participants) or reports says, is doctored, were lies. For example here, astronaut says "there is a bit of debris flying with us, illuminated by the sun".. he tells lies therefore, there where not any debris lit by the sun, but only big UFO's
etc.
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by depthoffield
you might be right , good find
I also said that no matter what the particles are, they are small and close
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by poet1b
good point poet1b,
i was just about to reply to DOF and say the same thing and in that document that Oberg posted it does indicate when water dumps were observed but in the page DOF posted it does not say anything about a water dump.
looks like it's back to the drawing board for the debunkers
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by depthoffield
I also said that no matter what the particles are, they are small and close
they can't be close to the camera because if they were we would see the "debri" in the beginning of the video and guess what ?...
we don't see any in the beginning of the video.
Page 18
C MS/ STBD TSS-1R and FWD BKHD. View is gradually illuminated as Columbia enters daylight.
16:57:11 20:39:11 B WS/ Waste water dump. False color. Earth view becomes visible as Columbia crosses terminator.
17:03:01 20:45:01 B WS/ Earth limb over the Pacific with port longeron in lower right FOV. Waste water dump concludes.
Page 55
15:32:51 19:14:51 D WS/ PLB. CAM continues to reposition.
15:33:16 19:15:16 D Earth views with starfield, city lights, airglow and MLE visible. CAM continues to reposition.
15:52:57 19:34:57 D WS/ Ice particles visible during waste water dump. Glare develops. CAM irises up/down. Orbital
sunrise occurs. CAM repositions to Earth view over Pacific Ocean, then repositions to aft PLB.
15:54:16 19:36:16 D MWS/ Aft PLB in/out of FOV. Glare from the sun illuminates the vertical stabilizer. Earth view in
background. CAM repositions continuously along aft PLB, TSS-1R Support Structure and SRPA
20:53:37 00:35:37 TOP AOS TDRE VIDEO. TOP experiment video. Orbit 033. MS/ OMS pods with RCS jet firings.
but here I'm researching the psychology of how people can continue to deny the truth in the face of overwhelming evidence presented to them.
Because several of these particles had clear disks they were not on the camera lens but rather quite remote, >10 m. Based on drag calculations they must have been quite large (larger than cm diameters) in order to persist with negligible motion in the field-of-view, We can offer no better explanation at this time.