It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Could you please explain what you meant, altitude or attitude? Thanks.
Originally posted by spacefan
also jim you are omitting the fact that the shuttle flew at 3 differing altitudes during that time because of the crystal experiment they were carrying out.
In AADSF, three lead-tin-telluride crystals grown while orbiter flown at three different attitudes to determine effect on crystal growth. Also collected data on crystal’s freezing point. Lead-tin-telluride used in infrared detectors and lasers.
PS: if you post a link to the source you don't need to (and you shouldn't) post so much text from that source. Also, you should use the [ex] and [/ex] tags to post text from external sources.
In AADSF, three lead-tin-telluride crystals grown while orbiter flown at three different attitudes to determine effect on crystal growth.
Originally posted by secretnasaman
Re: the date Jim...I guess I got it wrong...part of the problem is that I was too fast to post, without checking...I still have not checked, as I believe you.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by secretnasaman
The STS-75 Tether Break was at 7:30 PM, C.T., on the last day in Feb.1996. ....
I'm confused.
Visual observations of satellites are reported here:
satobs.org...
Regarding the tether break, message satobs.org... reports that the tether broke at approx Feb26/0130 GMT
That would indeed by 7:30 PM Feb 25, Central Time in the US and Canada.
NASA’s press release, also dated Feb 26, is here:
www.nasa.gov...
Was February 25 "the last day in February 1996" in Canada?
Clarification, please.
Watching a clip of the video for a quick answer, the sighting times
NASA states differ...as well as whether they are downloaded times, or live.. ,,,sorry, but I was hoping to answer the question too fast to try to keep up here on ATS,, & should have gone to the NASA Web sight for those type of known knowns!.
Columbia's astronauts had a clear view of the Tethered Satellite as the two spacecraft passed within about 46 nautical miles overnight. The closest approach occurred at 11:17 central time last night (approximately 7/08:59 MET), and was captured on videotape as the satellite and its 12-mile tether came into view.
These activities included observations of electrically charged, or "ionized," gas in Columbia's environment and its interactions with electron beams and orbiter water dumps.
Another investigation of Columbia's surroundings made use of the orbiter's Flash Evaporator System (FES). To accomplish this experiment, the crew participated in activating and deactivating the orbiter's water release systems and manually operating the Shuttle's attitude control system jets. This provided a controlled means of studying the distribution of neutral and charged particles in the vicinity of the payload bay during Shuttle water dumps.
Meanwhile, science teams at the Marshall Space Flight Center used the SETS experiment's instruments to give measurements which related to the ionized gas as it interacted with the water cloud. The water molecules in this cloud exchanged electrical charges with the surrounding ionized oxygen and formed a ring shape which could be easily distinguished from the ionized gas background around Columbia. This gave scientists and crew members an idea of how the Shuttle's environment might react to water dumps released while the tethered satellite is deployed.
Originally posted by spacefan
again here sts51 is the perfect example of whats required here about sts 75.
page 13.
www.shuttlepresskit.com...
Originally posted by JimOberg
What is needed is the as-flown timeline, or almost as good, the specific daily 'Update Packages' that are sent to the crew overnight before each working day, with detailed planned timelines.
What is also going to be helpful is the post-mission Scene List of all video downlink for the times in question.
And yes, it would be nice if NASA had these documents accessible on line.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
The execute packages online go back as far as STS-115, but don't seem to be there for earlier missions, ....
Originally posted by spacefan
should be an easy 10k jimbo you just have to ring up and tell him they are ice crystals and where to mail the cheque..
Originally posted by spacefan
Some people will have a hard time believing the photo's are real in this article so I am offering $10,000 to anyone who can prove the photo's are not real, that goes for NASA, Scientists or Governments.
Originally posted by depthoffield
Simply said: there is not enough information from the movie to identify all and every light there. Yet the closer out of focus bits of debris explains all what we have there as manifestations, but when accepting "all" we really have to learn a lot about physics, optics, orbital motion, shuttle activities, 2D projection of motion etc etc etc.
But, the reality is that debris particles is a common fact happening in missions. very common. A little less common (but yet it happens) is to catch them in right conditions of illumination, angle, zoom, camera setting etceterra.
Can we identify every or just one point there as beeing debris? or Ice? or a little flake of insulation? or part of the constelation "Urine-on? (). No. But we have a big probability of those beeing just like that.
Are they, or some of them alien ships, military or critterrs?
Originally posted by wmd_2008
So with regards to the shape of these things are we supposed to assume that just by chance if these things were.
a) Plasma critters they just happen to evolve in a shape looking like an out of focus object a lens would produce. that would be so convenient for you guys
b) Or that MOG from ZOG designed his spaceship looking like an out of focus object a lens would produce. again that would be so convenient for you guys
Thats what you guys are claiming!
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by spacefan
should be an easy 10k jimbo you just have to ring up and tell him they are ice crystals and where to mail the cheque..
Would be worth a shot with a jury -- but it's your money, and you set yourself up as sole judge, so it's obvious it's a stupid trick.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by spacefan
Prove what isn't real? Grossly oversaturated and zoomed pixels? Sure their real. What isn't real is the idea that you can pull hidden "detail" out of an image by doing that.
Have a look at these real alien creatures:
www.abovetopsecret.com...