It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Reevster
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by Reevster
I dont think these are stars...
Footage filmed during NASA Space Shuttle STS-80 Mission.
One of the best sts mission videos out there in my view.
"Thinking" doesn't make it so, or not so.
Tell me, what do the direct witnesses -- the astronauts on STS-80 and the Mission Control team watching the TV, think these dots are?
Wouldn't that be important to find out?
True enough..... but do you think that if the astronauts did see crafts that they would be allowed to tell the public what they have seen ...I think not, not only would it be a career killer it could be just plain a killer........ so and so astronaut had an accident or was suicided etc .
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by JScytale
thanks but i have already seen that video from the ufo hunters. they did demonstrate that these objects that appear to be passing behind the tether and the strange critter shape they have could be an illusion.
what the video in the Op shows is...no matter if these objects went behind the tether or not, they are making delta V shaped maneuvers and at one point in the video you will see one of the objects stop ! and then do a 180 degree turn in direction.
that is what needs to be explained
Originally posted by JScytale
what's next? do you scoff when people tell you the earth rotates around the sun?
Originally posted by JScytale
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by JimOberg
The history channel has me absorbed by its attempt to sell me the big bang theory.
you don't recognize the mountains of evidence supporting the big bang theory? pray tell, how do you explain the fact that the universe is expanding and that the heat remaining from the big bang is not only still present but easily measurable?
what's next? do you scoff when people tell you the earth rotates around the sun?
Originally posted by Reevster
True enough..... but do you think that if the astronauts did see crafts that they would be allowed to tell the public what they have seen ...I think not, not only would it be a career killer it could be just plain a killer........ so and so astronaut had an accident or was suicided etc .
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by ByteChanger
There is also a faint light before the 'ship' appears. I've noticed this faint light in other videos where 'ships' suddenly appear out of no where...
Good eyes. That's the way it seems it looks when the shuttle moves into sunrise, and stuff floating in its shadow drift out into the sunlight and suddenly 'appears'.
The key is to actually know when sunrise occurs, and that requires knowing the date/time of many of these 'ufo videos'. That may explain why the promoters refuse to provide this data. Without it, a plausible prosaic hypothesis is next to impossible, so they rig the game by covering up critical information.
And their target audience, for the most part, goes along with the trick.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
night(!)
It's amazing, year in, year out you continue with this explanation as if every phenomenom occurs only in the dark. UFOs have been videotaped in daylight also, Jim! Tons of videos. How about the one where some shuttle videographer tracks a hauling UFO above the earth for the longest time? You can see it in that embarrassing video "THE SECRET NASA TRANSMISSIONS: THE SMOKING GUN". You know that one, it's full of ice particles, debris, water dumps, etc., all of the goodies NASA and some "spokepersons" trout out because they don't want to admit they're stumped!
Can you imagine, back in the early 1980s while lying on a pool-side lounge at night(!) looking up at the heavens I saw 3 ice particles/debris/water dumps disguised as "stars" and the "stars" went from dead still to hauling. How did the ice particles/debris/water dump form into 3 stars and then haul away? Did the shuttle on the other side of the planet fire its thrusters? Did I mention it was at night? How could I see the ice particles if the sun hadn't risen? Oh, the mystery of it all!
Could you please explain why all of those "things" could not be ice particles or shuttle debris? As far as I know they could, the problem is knowing if they were or not.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
What is not mentioned more in the skeptics' criticism is that the tether is approx. 75 miles away from the camera (correct me on distance if I'm wrong) and all of those "things" could not be ice particles or shuttle debris or any other simple "NASA" explanation that what we are seeing are close to the camera or is an eletronic effect in the camera, etc.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Could you please explain why all of those "things" could not be ice particles or shuttle debris? As far as I know they could, the problem is knowing if they were or not.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
What is not mentioned more in the skeptics' criticism is that the tether is approx. 75 miles away from the camera (correct me on distance if I'm wrong) and all of those "things" could not be ice particles or shuttle debris or any other simple "NASA" explanation that what we are seeing are close to the camera or is an eletronic effect in the camera, etc.
Originally posted by poet1b
Hmm, the debunkers seem to be on a loop with these constant videos offering very weak, doctored evidence.
We have Astronauts saying there are Unidentified Flying Objects.
We have a NASA study that states there are Unidentified Flying Objects in NASA space videos, and yet people still refuse to believe that they exist.
I find it hard to believe that most of these sighting are space ships. Why would there be so many spaceships hanging around Earth. I would think that they would have already invaded by now. I could see a few research vehicle with scientists in the field grabbing and tagging a few people now and then, but why so many out in space just kind of wondering around?
I think plasma life forms makes the most sense, so I have started a thread on the subject in case anyone is interested.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by ArMaP
Could you please explain why all of those "things" could not be ice particles or shuttle debris? As far as I know they could, the problem is knowing if they were or not.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
What is not mentioned more in the skeptics' criticism is that the tether is approx. 75 miles away from the camera (correct me on distance if I'm wrong) and all of those "things" could not be ice particles or shuttle debris or any other simple "NASA" explanation that what we are seeing are close to the camera or is an eletronic effect in the camera, etc.
If I understand Ed's argument correctly, he thinks that since the objects appear to pass behind the tether, they must be further away than the claim that they are "particles" would infer.
However, this episode of UFO hunters demonstrates why we can't assume the particles passed behind the tether, just because it looks like they did:
[edit on 28-9-2009 by Arbitrageur]
Originally posted by JScytale
the force of gravity, on the surface of the earth, causes any object to accelerate towards the earth's center of mass at the rate of 9.8m/s^2, or 32ft/s^2.
...low earth orbit is approximately 150 km above the earth. at this altitude, the earth's gravity does the same thing, at the rate of acceleration of 9.361 meters per second faster every second. thats hardly much difference from 9.8 m/s^2, so the incredible rate of acceleration is almost identical.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by JimOberg
Is this the only time they have ever used this particular camera in the UV spectrum
The 'UV camera' stories are nonsense -- the shuttle's external cameras, the ones that downlinked these images, are simple visible-light systems for physical monitoring of activities in the payload bay -- not scientific astronomiical instruments.
No it is NOT nonsense at all. THESE STS75 images are taken with the TOP camera, as I have already documented several times and in fact are in UV. I do not understand why YOU of all people continue to use that argument.
Probably because I, of all people posting here, am most familiar with MCC operations.
The widely-posted STS-75 videos are from the visible-light payload bay cameras, as all records -- and the logs of the flight control team -- establish. The rest is unconstrained imagination.
The TOPS photos were not downlinked live. Call up the chief scientist and ask him.
The tether was bright when it was in sunlight and it was dark when it was in shadow. Everybody who saw it with their naked eyes -- including me -- observed that feature.
Originally posted by JScytale
Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by JScytale
they look exactly the same to me.
perhaps you might need to make some screen shots that overlay to get your point across because as of right now, i don't see what your trying to show me.
if someone could id appreciate it. i dont have screen capture software that won't create artifacts.
Originally posted by zorgon
NASA DID NOT RELEASE THIS TO THE PUBLIC
If this statement is untrue then link me to the ORIGINAL film from NASA itself.
The video we are discussing was captured by a PRIVATE satellite receiver in Canada by Martyn Stubbs, who is a member here under secretnasaman
There IS NO OFFICIAL NASA version of this available to the public. This was intercepted. There was even a long court battle over this film years ago that is all but forgotten to decide ownership.
If NASA has now decided to release their copy of this film, please link me to it as I must have missed it.
Originally posted by JScytale
how hard is it to understand that whether or not there was a plasma sheath changes nothing in this debate?
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
Originally posted by JScytale
the force of gravity, on the surface of the earth, causes any object to accelerate towards the earth's center of mass at the rate of 9.8m/s^2, or 32ft/s^2.
...low earth orbit is approximately 150 km above the earth. at this altitude, the earth's gravity does the same thing, at the rate of acceleration of 9.361 meters per second faster every second. thats hardly much difference from 9.8 m/s^2, so the incredible rate of acceleration is almost identical.
jScytale, your internal logic is entirely inconsistent. LEO gravity and Earth surface gravity are VERY different things.