New Analysis Video of the STS-75 Tether Incident

reply to post by mcrom901

check this too..... @ sts-74
www.sendspace.com...

thanks mcrom901

will check it out

even if i find a real ufo in one of the pictures...







[edit on 5-1-2010 by alien]

Originally posted by easynow
wmd_2008 will still look for the mundane explanation

i wonder what he has to say about this one.....



thats from sts-77.....

www.sendspace.com...

Originally posted by wmd_2008
You really need to consider how you should eliminate the obvious first before clutching at straws!

are you suggesting that all the missing frame numbers from the released images by nasa fall under 'eliminate the obvious' category......

reply to post by wmd_2008

If your going to quote, quote in full ,fool

read this ,
www.abovetopsecret.com...

who's the fool now ?

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 5-1-2010 by easynow]

reply to post by easynow




Re the song not enough of you !!

reply to post by mcrom901




Do really think the object on that picture was NOT a reflection

You guys just cant accept the simple explanations

[edit on 5-1-2010 by alien]

[edit on 5-1-2010 by easynow]

reply to post by easynow

Probably the same thing that is visible on the photo taken before that.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/4fc2ae550e82725b.jpg[/atsimg]


To all (including me ).

Just because this thread is now on the "ATS Skunk Works" forum it doesn't mean you can start insulting each other and posting off-topic photos like this one, OK.

reply to post by wmd_2008


ok, chill.... no need to get overexcited.... too much pressure is not good for da 'reflections'.....

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by ArMaP




[edit on 5-1-2010 by easynow]

Originally posted by mcrom901
reply to post by wmd_2008

 

ok, chill.... no need to get overexcited.... too much pressure is not good for da 'reflections'.....

www.youtube.com...

You to mate

I would like to remind everyone that one liners and personal sniping are not encouraged here. Please remain on topic with posts directed at the discussion of the topic.

Thank you.

Semi-Polite Mod Request

The back-and-forth stuff stops now please.

Regardless of if its in response to what may be perceived as a jib at you - ultimately if you respond in turn, well, you both end up looking muddy.

By all means discuss and debate with passion - but never poison.


On-topic again...


Thanks,
Alien

Hi Mr. Oberg:

I had Brian O'Leary email you a few days ago, at one of your public email addresses, but it might have been lost in the spam. I sent you a U2U with Brian's email and how to contact him.

Thanks for your help in putting this controversy to bed.

reply to post by Mr. Mephistopheles


Putting what to bed?

Claims that we are seeing objects produced by the shuttle have been proven to be nonsense and there are a couple of NASA studies on the thread that show these can not be particles generated by the space shuttle. We have a NASA stating that there are things in these videos that can not be explained.

This is what is known.

Essentially, since man achieved flight, pilots in aircraft have observed strange phenomenon high up in the atmosphere, reported by people who are completely sane.

We have reports of these mysterious UFO's throughout the history of humanity.

We have numerous videos where we see things in space that can not be reasonably explained, except by considering that we are observing something that we have yet to understand.

reply to post by wmd_2008


The simplest explanation is that we are seeing something we have yet to understand.

Take gravity for instance.

We know that it exists, it is easily demonstrable, but we still don't have a reasonable explanation for its nature.

While we do not have the ability to capture, test, or easily observe these types of foo fighter UFOs, there is a vast body of reports, pictures, and videos of this phenomenon, that can not be explained by camera anomalies.

See my first statement.

Different issue:

www.abovetopsecret.com...