It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A) Mr. Silverstein bought the properties and immediately took out a record insurance policy on the entire complex>
B) The buildings were so huge they couldn't keep the place completely rented. They were losing money.
C) The previous owners had been trying to get permits to demolish the buildings and were continuously denied the permits because there was asbestos in the building that would be released into the air if they were to be demolished. So the buildings were in a sense condemned. So we conclude that there is a strong desire to demolish the buildings by the owner(s), Larry Silverstein and partners.
D) It has been demonstrated to an extremely high degree that fire did not or could not bring these buildings down and that the manner in which they were destroyed could only have been a "controlled demolition".
E) Al Qaida would not have been able to have access to these buildings to place the charges required for such a demolition in the months prior to 911.
F) Larry Silverstein and Co. are the only ones who could have had this access to place the charges.
G) Silverstein, knowing that there was a high probabilityof the eminent attack, had the charges placed in the buildings ready to go off if such an attack was to take place OR more likely he had preknowledge of the event to begin with.
H) At the cost of a couple of thousand lives, he gained BILLIONS of dollars....
AND YOU ARE GOING TO BELIEVE OR EVEN CARE ABOUT WHAT HE SAID ABOUT WHAT HIS WIFE SAID ABOUT A DOCTOR APPOINTMENT??? Dude, WAKE UP!!
WHEN WILL CONSPIRACY AND MASS MURDER CHARGES BE BROUGHT AGAINST THIS WEASEL???????!!!!!!!!!! There were more resources exhausted investigating Clinton getting a blowjob than this.
The previous source also mentions that Silverstein originally wanted to only buy 1.5 billion dollars in coverage, and eventually went with 3.5 billion dollars, which was still far less than the lenders suggested- in short, Silverstein was trying to purchase the bare minimum coverage. Logic dictates that if Silverstein had foreknowledge of the 9-11 attacks, as conspiracy theorists claim, he would have purchased the maximum coverage.
As for the claim that Silverstein properties made substantial profit as a result of the 9-11 collapse, that is a total lie and the evidence is here. The insurance payout won’t reach anywhere near $7.1 billion. Furthermore, at the moment the payments are only going to be 4.6 billion dollars and that money is going to rebuild the WTC complex, which will cost about 6.3 billion. In addition, Silverstein still has to pay the rent, which is $120 million per year to keep the right to rebuild. Hmm, let’s see, so the cost of rebuilding is MORE than the insurance payout? Seems to me that’s a loss, not a profit. Members of the 9-11 “Truth” Movement may want to brush up on their math.
As Real Estate Director, a position Mrs. Nanninga has held since 1996, the occupancy rate at the trade center has risen from 78 percent to a healthy 98 percent, retail soared in the trade center's mall, and available office space in the Newark Legal Center has nearly been filled.
Anticipating a ban (on the use of asbestos in construction in NY), the builders stopped using the materials by the time they reached the 40th floor of the north tower, the first one to go up…" According to a spokesman for the Port Authority "more than half of the original, asbestos-containing material was later replaced."
On April 13, 1970, New York City issued restrictions on the application of sprayed thermal insulation containing asbestos. The use of BLAZE-SHIELD Type D was discontinued in 1970 at the 38th floor of WTC 1. The asbestos-containing material was subsequently encapsulated with a sprayed material that provided a hard coating. A green dye was added to the encapsulating material so that the asbestos containing SFRM could be identified.