Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 121 times


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 07:01 AM by DangerDeath
Originally posted by AnonymousMoose
Just wait until Codex Alimentarius goes into affect and the WHO creates strict international standards on supplements...all of these natural cures will be illegal


Read what happened to Wilhelm Reich...

en.wikipedia.org...



In 1947, following a series of critical articles about orgone and his political views in The New Republic and Harper's,[5] the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began an investigation into his claims about orgone, winning an injunction against the interstate sale of orgone accumulators. Charged with contempt of court for violating the injunction, Reich conducted his own defense, which involved sending the judge all his books to read, and arguing that a court was no place to decide matters of science. He was sentenced to two years in prison, and in August 1956, several tons of his publications were burned by the FDA in a garbage incinerator in New York City.[6][7] He died of heart failure in jail just over a year later, days before he was due to apply for parole.[8]




several tons of his publications were burned by the FDA

Burned, like at those times of witch-hunt!


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 08:45 AM by DangerDeath
reply to post by lpowell0627





I can argue this both ways. If there's a guy preaching cures and the FDA (or whatever gov't agency you choose to insert here) finds that his "cure" is actually hurting people, I don't blame them for burning information. Bad information spreads like wildfire. Now add money and conspiracy theories and it spreads even faster and further.


His method is accepted elsewhere, and it is still banned in America.
He was held in prison for "contempt" - would you like to be held in prison for the same reason, without a trial?


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 10:23 AM by lpowell0627
reply to post by DangerDeath



Of course not. I only attempted to defend the burning of information, not his imprisonment.

There are many things that are accepted in other countries that are banned in the US - public hangings, communism, etc. Doesn't make them right.

edit to add: I realize they are not the same - but I was simply making the point that just because things are accepted elsewhere doesn't make them acceptable everywhere.

Further, no I do not think his imprisonment is right. Period. I think there are too many trumped up ways to keep people behind bars whenever it suits the gov't's purpose.

[edit on 6-6-2009 by lpowell0627]


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 10:54 AM by Ziltoid_the_Omniscient
reply to post by SaraThustra



Go to TheDCAsite.com

The people there can answer any questions you have and point you to places where you can purchase DCA safely, and places to avoid, also learn techniques from others that are using it. Like combining it with caffine seems to be helping people, I think it was black tea.

--Z


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 10:56 AM by DarkSecret
sounds like a promising drug however there are many risks associated with this substance. not sure if anyone researched it, but here's a good study www.epa.gov...

of course chemo or radiation may be worse but anyone considering this should be under medical supervision.



Overt clinical signs were evident in the high-dose animals throughout the duration of the experiment. Dyspnea (shortness of breath or difficulty in breathing) was observed in high-dose animals starting at day 45, and worsened with time. Partial paralysis of the hind limbs was observed in three animals in the high-dose group during the latter half of the exposure period. Conjunctivitis was observed in 24/30 treated animals and a few controls during the first month, and became more severe later in the study. The occurrence of ocular effects appeared to be dose-related, with 8 of 10 high-dose dogs affected. Reduced food and water intake was noted in DCA-treated dogs, although the effect did not appear to be dose-related. High-dose males exhibited a 16% reduction in body weight, while high-dose females and mid-dose males experienced a 9% reduction in weight gain over the duration of the study. Mid-dose females exhibited an 11% reduction in weight gain. Dogs in the mid- and high-dose groups experienced sporadic diarrhea. The most severely affected dogs required fluid therapy to prevent severe dehydration. One female and two males treated at 72 mg/kg-day died during the study. The deaths were attributed to pneumonia and dehydration.




The cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas significantly increased in animals exposed to 1 g/L (71%), 2 g/L (95%), and 3.5 g/L (100%) when compared to controls (26%). Hepatocellular carcinoma multiplicity (tumor/animal) significantly increased in all treatment groups as follows: 0.05 g/L (0.58), 0.5 g/L (0.68), 1 g/L (1.29), 2 g/L (2.47) and 3.5 g/L (2.90) compared to the control group (0.28). The cumulative incidence of hepatocellular adenomas was also significantly increased in animals exposed to 1 g/L (51.4%), 2 g/L (42.9%), and 3.5 g/L (45%) as compared to controls (10%) and the 0.5 g/L group (20%).



reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 11:09 AM by DarkSecret
Originally posted by mmiichael
Cancer is not a single disease, an aggregate of illnesses that share the body's inability to control it's own cell reproduction.

So there can be no single Cancer cure because the causes and specifics vary.

One shouldn't rush to judgement on condemning all of modern medicine. Admittedly the pharmaceutical giants are monstrously greedy and abuse their authority. And doctors genuinely lack the time to keep up with all literature pro and con. More modern doctors are aware that too many pharmaceuticals being used can be as threatening as some diseases. It's called adverse drug interference and kills many millions. But it is still difficult to monitor.


i agree that cancer is not just one disease. it's as if you're saying bacterial infections are all the same and they're not. although we've learned how to cope with them pretty well and because of antibiotics we don't need to know the exact location of the infection to drain it like it used to be done a century ago.

my hope is that there will be tests just like the virus/bacteria tests we have today which can tell you what strain you've got and which type of medicine will effectively fight it off. and of course as with bacterial infections, many other factors need to work together, like hygiene, avoiding certain foods (you're not supposed to have milk or dairy with antibiotics!) and generally following a protocol which will help your body fight it off.



reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 11:13 AM by dodadoom
i]reply to post by mmiichael



I have some background in the medical field. My own wife was an MD who died yound og Cancer. Cancer is not a single disease, an aggregate of illnesses that share the body's inability to control it's own cell reproduction. So there can be no single Cancer cure because the causes and specifics vary.
Minimizing exposure to carcinogens is the mostt effective formof prevention. One shouldn't rush to judgement on condemning all of modern medicine. Admittedly the pharmaceutical giants are monstrously greedy and abuse their authority. And doctors genuinely lack the time to keep up with all literature pro and con. More modern doctors are aware that too many pharmaceuticals being used can be as threatening as some diseases. It's called adverse drug interference and kills many millions. But it is still difficult to monitor. Western medicine is slanted towards alleviating symptoms not outright cures. Advisable to anyone is to find the root causes of medical conditions and deal with them. Cancer rates will probably continue to be wildly escalated until some of the the causes are removed from our environment.

Yes, people will continue to pollute their bodies while screaming for a cure!
Good stuff and spot on! I can tell you have medical experience!
You are basically saying what I have been.
Cancer is a disease of the entire system.
There are alternatives to being a doctors guinea pig!
Your health, your choice! Do you really trust someone making huge
amounts of money from you to know whats right for you,
or do YOU take care of you? I chose the latter and its worked great!
Thank you for your words here! Great add!

P.S. I go to a doctor for broken bones and antibiotics, thats it.
Maybe thats why I stay healthy!
Like a flu shot gives you the flu, you go to the doctors to GET sick!



[edit on 6-6-2009 by dodadoom]


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 01:44 PM by sn00daard
It's truely sickening. There have been cures around for some time now but none of them can be patented. No money == no drugs.
Cancer cured

Our society needs te rethink the way it operates, people need to open their eyes and say STOP, NO MORE!

Not that I think I will see that happen in my lifetime, but a man can dream ey.


[edit on 6-6-2009 by sn00daard]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 16 hours ago, 116 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 12 hours ago, 99 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 63 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies