Its surprising that of the few of the replys ive seen here in the first 2 pages that quite a number of people are arguing seperation of church and
state. This is not matter of the State or the Church why on the one hand the UCLA gets funding tax payer or private that doesnt matter if it was
state or church currency.
What this case is about is simply one of the biggest violations of freedom of speech ive seen in many years next to that attempt to create a bible
permit recently.
You could argue that if a church funded publicy or privately this university they would have some say if not all say in what could be and could not be
in there school especially if there the ones paying for it.
This isnt really a issue over money either this is censorship at its core and I dont care how you try to justify it or say that its acceptable on any
level its not. First this women gets censored/prohibited next its one of us or someone else that's not here that does not yet know this news story
has taken place.
The national news media had better be making this news story its top priority also because guess what CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, ABC exc exc exc your next.
You think im wrong on this I could site example after example of how many reporters have gotten either fired or lost there jobs for covering some news
story that didnt fit all the news that's fit to print and still ended up making some of the biggest news stories as a result of it.
First its this women then its a small city or town doing the same thing then its a large company then a large city then it goes to a national law that
prohibits us all from doing something that's perfactly legal and lawful we have now thrown up a wall against.
Censorship is Censorship a Police State is a Police State. But this is not a spade that's a spade what we are dealing with here in this story is
malice and fourthought on the behalf of the UCLA to delberatly stop and prohibit freedom of expression / freedom of speech. This is not just a case
that should only be prosecuted by the State against the UCLA for violations of the First and 14th Amendment.
This case may very well be more groundbreaking then the rosa parks case on civil rights viloations. There was no broken law on the behalf of the
women in this case and yet the UCLA felt it was within some bestowed authority to attempt to lisense this womens freedom of speach.
I know the 14th amendment and the 1st amendment very well I dont need to quote it here. If the news media as a whole the major networks will not
cover this case then you people in those positions need to lose your jobs simply for the fact its going to be you next if you dont support this women
as being the new larry fint.
Larry as publishing a unpopular by some publication still has the right to do it, he went to jail and got shot and now spends his life in a wheel
chair for all of you to have the right to speak your minds in places like this.
Every Military personal that fought in a overseas war that was a real war not a contracted one like the two ones we have now went to war over everyone
in the united states of america's right to more then just freedom of speach.
And to belittle that and or belittle anyone who has been willing to go to jail or more on cases like this belittles your rights you have to even
respond to this posting and anothers like it on ats and else where.
The idea and or notion that it is so called "good" that this happened anywhere in this country or anywhere else goes to show the real state of this
society and how far we have really fallen as a nation if we turn a blind eye to a issue this large that effects us all.
For those who wish to contradict this message or anyone else who stays its my right to say it was the UCLA's right to censor this women yes you have
that right today. You keep up that idealism and you wont have it anymore.
Thats my 2 cents for now on this matter.
Falcon