Israel papers: new era in US ties, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times
Topic started on 5-6-2009 @ 11:54 AM by SLAYER69

Israel papers: new era in US ties


news.bbc.co.uk
Commentators in Israeli papers interpreted US President Barack Obama's address to the Muslim world as marking a clear shift in ties between the US and Israel, and possibly the end of a special relationship.

One writer called on the Israeli government to adapt to the new winds blowing from Washington or face a storm
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:00 PM by SLAYER69

President Barack Obama addressed a wide array of issues, including the Iraq war and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in his address to Muslims in Cairo Thursday. (June 4)




reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:09 PM by TheMythLives
reply to post by SLAYER69





Following President Barack Obama's address in Cairo Thursday, the U.S. administration is now trying to lower tensions with Israel.

Senior White House officials told Haaretz following the president's speech that "there is no crisis in our relationship with Israel, and we will succeed in reaching understandings on the matter of settlements."


And sense when does the U.S go out of there way to say that there is no crisis? O well, that means, there's a crisis....


Sources in the prime minister's bureau also said that the tensions with the U.S. over settlements had been aggravated by the Cairo speech.


is it me or does there seem to be two VERY different sides to the story? Israel is pissed and the U.S is trying to call a mulligan. Perhaps we didn't think this through....

LINK

[edit on Jun 5th 2009 by TheMythLives]


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:16 PM by maloy
I seriously doubt that Netanyahu will yield to Obama's innitiatives on solving the Palestinian problem. For one thing Israel prepared for this split in relations to happen back when they understood that Obama is going to be elected in 2008. That is also partially the reason why Israel rushed to undertake it's incursion into Gaza before Obama took office.

If Netanyahu has to choose between siding with Obama or siding with the majority of Israel's population, he will no doubt choose the later. Doing otherwise could pave for the demise of his party and leadership. The question is can Israel continue to maintain course if its relation's with Obama's administration suffer a split, and for how long? I think that it has a strong enough lobby in the US and extensive connection with the US defense industry and Congress to be able to do that.



As for US - it is really not losing anything by trying out this new strategy of "sucking up" to the Muslim world. A temporary split in relations with Israel won't really come back to haunt it, because Israel depends on the US far more than US depends on Israel. I still doubt though that Obama's overtures will be successful. No matter how charismatic or likeable he is, there is still extensive distrust of America in the Muslim world. He will not overcome this distrust by simply taking a stance against Israeli actions. In addition to this Obama might make some enemies among the powerful pro-Israeli lobby in the US (and that includes members of Congress).

[edit on 5-6-2009 by maloy]


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:19 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by Manouche



Have you seen the whole speech?
He did a fair bit on Iran.
I finally saw it late last night in it's entirety.


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:25 PM by TheMythLives
reply to post by SLAYER69



I mean, I understand wanting to make peace with our "enemies" but making peace with enemies at the COST of diminishing a HIGHLY Important friendship, doesn't make sense to me. They our are enemies they hate us, we know this, lets stop shoving our foots further in our mouths and just let people and Nations BE....

[edit on Jun 5th 2009 by TheMythLives]


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:37 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by TheMythLives



I hear you but at some point in time the shouting has to stop and the talking has to take place. The US and Israels bond are too tight to be broken but Tel Aviv needs to understand who's the big dog. IMO Israel has been the tail that has waged the dog for too long. Iran will have to be dealt with sooner or later, I say sooner. We'll try dialogue if that doesn't work we still carry a big stick. After dialogue begins and if it fails with Iran then nobody can say we didn't try.



reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:39 PM by TheMythLives
reply to post by SLAYER69



Very well said, and like mother used to say:

"At least we tried."


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 12:47 PM by Manouche
reply to post by SLAYER69



I have read it.
It's not the part about Iran which made the headlines today.
There is a part about Israel in which Obama underlines and repeats the strong and "unbreakable" ties between Israel and the USA. It's completely forgotten.
If the USA engage in subtle diplomacy in this zone, there may be a need to rebalance the perception left through the media reports of the speech by pointing a finger at someone. Reviving the fear around Iran a bit and giving grounds to Israel's accusations might do the trick.
I don't think there is any will to break up with Israel. If the goal here is to secure the region, dropping Israel would just do the opposite.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags