"Resistith No Evil", page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 11:11 AM by visible_villain
reply to post by StopComplaining


You asked :
How many people actually think that Jesus' action plan [resisteth not evil] could actually work.

Many would agree with Him on this point for the following reasons -

The Bodhicaryavatara Chapter VI: The Perfection of Patience

41. Disregarding the principle of cause, such as a stick and the like, if I become angry with the one who impels it, then it is better if I hate hatred, because that person is also impelled by hatred.

42. In the past, I too have inflicted such pain on sentient beings; therefore, I, who have caused harm to sentient beings, deserve that in return.

43. Both his weapon and my body are causes of suffering. He has obtained a weapon, and I have obtained a body. With what should I be angry?

44. Blinded by craving, I have obtained this [bag of filth] that appears as a human body, which cannot bear to be touched. When there is pain, with whom should one be angry?

45. I do not desire suffering; yet, fool that I am, I desire the cause of suffering. When suffering emerges due to my own fault, why should I be angry with anyone else?

46. Just as the forest of razor leaves and the birds of hell are brought into existence by my actions, so is this. With whom should I be angry?

47. Those who hurt me are impelled by my actions, as a result of which they will go to the infernal realms. Surely, it is I alone who have ruined them.

48. On account of them, many vices of mine diminish through forbearance. On account of me, they enter infernal realms with long lasting agonies.

49. It is I alone who harm them, and they are my benefactors. O Wicked mind, why do you misconstrue this and become angry?

50. If there is virtue in my intention, I will not enter the infernal realms. If I protect myself, what will happen to them here?

51. If I were to retaliate, they would not be protected and my conduct would be impaired. Because of that, those in anguish would be lost.

52. Because of its immateriality, the mind can never be harmed by anyone. However, due to its attachment to the body, the mind is tormented by suffering.

53. Neither contempt, abusive speech, nor disgrace harms the body. Why then, mind, O mind, do you become angry?

54. Will the unkindness of others toward me devour me in this life or another, that I am so adverse to it?

55. If I am adverse to it because it hinders my material gain, my acquisitions will vanish in this life, but my sin will surely remain.

56. It is better that I die today, than have a long, corrupt life. For even after living a long time, I shall have the suffering of death.

57. One person wakes up after enjoying a hundred years of pleasure in sleep, and another person wakes up after being happy for a moment.

58. Does happiness return to either once they have awakened? It is the same at the moment of death for one who lives a long time and for one who lives a short time.

59. Even though I have acquired many possessions and have enjoyed pleasures for a long time, I shall depart empty handed and naked as if I had been robbed.

Source : shantiDeva.net



reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 05:42 PM by StopComplaining
reply to post by StopComplaining



By the way I do not have anything against exposing peoples bad deads as long as you give them an opportunity to repent first.



reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 05:46 PM by StopComplaining
reply to post by visible_villain



Yes the ancient Vedas and such seem to agree with Jesus. But Jesus said it alot more concisely.

so the score is something like 5 to 2 in favour of resisting evil.

[edit on 6-6-2009 by StopComplaining]

[edit on 6-6-2009 by StopComplaining]

[edit on 6-6-2009 by StopComplaining]


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 05:50 PM by StopComplaining
reply to post by StopComplaining



5 to 4 if you count Jesus and Bodhicaryavatara. But in a democracy the point of veiw of Jesus would still represent a minority, even if you illigally count dead voters.

[edit on 6-6-2009 by StopComplaining]


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 05:54 PM by HulaAnglers
reply to post by StopComplaining



The mind has no limitations except those dominating it through cultural conditioning. I myself am pretty centered now - have been through a tough initiation and my own naivety has been shattered to make way for my own light - I do not worship any god or man - I only respect awareness and consciousness, and all the politician's of this world must go as they are in the way of evolution for the rest of us. If we base our lives on ancient texts we are bound to recreate suffering over and over again and that's insane.


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 06:11 PM by mostlyspoons
reply to post by unityemissions



4% are sociopathic? I think thats an underestimation... Maybe 4% have been diagnosed as such, but I'd wager there are many many more undiscovered sociopaths out there running amok. My bet is at least 12%!!


Back on topic though, to explain what I think Jesus meant:

Theoretically,
Let's say every time someone slaps your cheek, they lose 1 point.

If you slap them back, you also lose a point.

If you present the other cheek, and they also slap that one, then they lose another point.

When you die, the points are tallied and those who kept their points at a positive number WIN!!! Negative point values result in eternal punishment...

So in other words; allowing them to strike both cheeks is far worse for them in the end than any type of vengeful action you can take against them while living an earthly life!!

[edit on 6-6-2009 by mostlyspoons]

[edit on 6-6-2009 by mostlyspoons]


reply posted on 6-6-2009 @ 06:44 PM by visible_villain
reply to post by StopComplaining


You said :
Yes the ancient Vedas and such seem to agree with Jesus. But Jesus said it alot more concisely.

This citation is from southern India, 700 AD, ShantiDeva, a Buddhist luminary, not the Vedas ...

My point is that one can find corroboration for the Master's teachings without too much trouble.



reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 01:31 PM by unityemissions
reply to post by mostlyspoons



You're most likely correct. The official black & white statistics says ~4%, but it only takes a man of conscience to take a look around to see it's more than 1 in 25.

My best guess would be 10-30%.


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 07:32 AM by HulaAnglers
reply to post by StopComplaining



If anyone should be turning the other cheek it is "God" and his Biblers


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 08:02 AM by lagenese
Originally posted by StopComplaining
Originally posted by HulaAnglers
reply to
post by StopComplaining



The mind has no limitations except those dominating it through cultural conditioning. I myself am pretty centered now - have been through a tough initiation and my own naivety has been shattered to make way for my own light - I do not worship any god or man - I only respect awareness and consciousness, and all the politician's of this world must go as they are in the way of evolution for the rest of us. If we base our lives on ancient texts we are bound to recreate suffering over and over again and that's insane.





So what your trying to say is Blahdy Blah Blah Blah Bleep Bleep Bleep Blahdy Blah Blah Blah.


These words written by HulaAnglers are from her experience and understanding of how things really work in life. I've been thru my own initiation, and i can relate to what was written by Hula. If you were to have experienced the same things, you would surely know the same things.
Humans live according to the past, and that is why history repeats itself. All the answers we need are within, not in any teachings like religion, theosophy, philosophy or any other systems of thought.

The lack of knowledge pushes humans to believe in something, to secure their mind. Beliefs and knowledge are very different in nature. Knowledge stems from experience and understanding. Beliefs, on the other hand, can bring humans to experience deception. It's all part of the manipulation of the human mind.

The answer you gave Hula was uncalled for. It shows a total lack of respect or experience.



reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 05:58 PM by StopComplaining
Originally posted by HulaAnglers
reply to
post by StopComplaining



If anyone should be turning the other cheek it is "God" and his Biblers


Are you trying to say you would like to slap God?

I looked at your link, of coarse the clergy and the popes and cardinals are Hypocrites, The Bible, and Yashua (Christ) actually say as much.


reply posted on 30-11-2009 @ 10:10 PM by StopComplaining
In regards to the "resist no evil" command given by Yashua
(Jesus Christ)

This testimony written by Andy Pero, helped me see most clearly the application that command has.
educate-yourself.org... ... ct99.shtml

Andy Pero is an unsaved man, he is also under mind control ,according to his own testimony he resisted evil with great will power, anger, and desperation. But it did not work. It is a curious fact of hypnosis, that strong willed people are the easiest people to manipulate.

In Andys' case the little amount of mental freedom he did gain in order to write his testimony was gained, by his own admission, when he co-operated and helped to mind control himself.

A hypnotist or NLP expert can capitalize on the predictableness of your resistance and double-bind you with their doubletounged(G1351) ways, so that they link your primal instinct to resist with the action they want you to perform.

The only way to fight this is to "overcome" through the blood of the lamb. 2Co 10:4 (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds.

And in regards to James 4:7 which says "resist the devil" the full quote reads.
"Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you."

Hypnosis NLP basically consists of setting up codes cues and trigger, which are akin to the talismans, spells and idols of old. The key words that are used to enduce states have no meaning nor power in themselves, neither do talismans or logos, they "see not, nor hear, nor know" (Dan 5:23). But they can be artificailly linked to states of mind in order to create a link or corrilation (not causality) between the two concepts.

The only way I beleive you can escape this arbitrary or imposed linking together of two unrelated concepts is to practice the first two commandments.

If you watch this link www.youtube.com... you can see derren brown (unsaved, non beleiver), play anti-christ and induce a feeling of reverence.

This reverence can then be used to be linked to a rock, mother, earth nature, Jaguar, or usually a guru. It's basically like the proverbial duck, people who have this false awakening will tend to link reverence to the first thing they see.

Anyway my point is that resisting the feeling of awe is inaffective and will only intensify it.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Startling revelations from a Swiss banking insider
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
Rothschild Speaks: Want\'s One World Currency
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags
ACTA and You - Important Video - It has Begun
  Posted 12 days ago with 15 member flags
Know Thine Enemy! Iran Warns of Coming Great Event.
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
MSM Try To Debunk Illuminati Denver Airport Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
They\'re Back!! Soros: Occupy To Turn Violent
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags