I agree that Nationalism is so 19th century! We need to get with the times and scrap Nationalism altogether (and do so in a way that doesn't ruffle
the feathers of the paranoid thinking it's a NWO/Illuminati/Master-Plan).
One of the first steps to doing such, other than trying things the EU style which is so progressive in a very boring way, would be to establish a
universal language.
I find it amusing that Americans and Brits always seem to think that English already is the Universal language. Such ignorance is the reason we are
scoffed at when we go abroad. Spanish is actually the most WIDELY spoken language and Mandarin is the one most COMMONLY spoken language in the world
currently. (
Languages by Number of Speakers and
Languages by Ethnologue). And let's be perfectly honest here...the
only reason so many people worldwide speak English as a Third language is because the old joke about Americans and Brits is all too true...
"What do you call a person who speaks two languages?"
"Bilingual"
"What do you call a person who speaks three languages?"
"Trilingual"
"What do you call a person who speaks many languages?"
"Polylingual"
"What do you call a person who speaks only one language?"
An Englishman (or American depending on who is telling the joke)"
Bless the rest of the world for catering to our own educational inadequacies for the last century or two by learning how to speak our language when we
were unwilling of learning to speak theirs!
I too, vote for Esperanto, although it may be equally as difficult for those accustomed to Pan-Asiatic languages to master, just as it is for those
accustomed to 20-24 letters in the alphabet to comprehend a base 800 character language.
Maybe we should start from scratch.
[edit on 4-6-2009 by fraterormus]