We NEED a Universal World Language, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 05:53 PM by benevolent tyrant
reply to post by TurkeyBurgers



You certainly are not the first to express this sentiment. A global language would be of great benefit to unite the people of this planet. It would, undoubtedly, foster understanding and, of course, communication between peoples of varying cultures and ethnic origins and traditions.

A global language does exist -- I am excluding Mandarin, English, Spanish and French -- languages that might be considered common global languages. I am referring to Esperanto.

Esperanto is the first "contrived" language. That is, it's the first language that was deliberately constructed to facilitate global communication. Using elements from a number of languages, Esperanto has enjoyed some brief periods of acceptance and success at different periods since it's inception. At present, it is still in existence and Google even has a search portal in Esperanto.


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 05:58 PM by octotom
reply to post by SLAYER69



English is already the universal language.

Many people think they speak English. I run into very few people here in Europe that actually can. Which is sad because everyone is forced to take five years of it.




But, if we're looking for a language that's not English to be the language for Earth, I vote for Esperanto. I actually started teaching it to myself yesterday, so this is rather timely.

The good thing about Esperanto is that it is really simple and easy to learn. Many are fluent in it after just 100 hours of study. That compares to 1500 or so for German and 1000 for English. With Esperanto being a man made language, a lot of the irregularities are not present that are in "natural" langauges. For example, there are no irregular verbs, they all congugate the same. So, for example, send in the first person singular in English is "send" and in the third person it is "sends". In Esperanto, it is simply "sendas". It is said that Esperanto flows more with the natural pattern of how people think. [This makes sense if you've tried to learn another langauge!] It's the largest spoken manmade language too. It also sounds like Italian--how cool's that?

adiaŭ!

[edit on 6/4/2009 by octotom]


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 06:08 PM by octotom
reply to post by Unit541



culture is strong, and different cultures don't blend well with one another.


When Zinnendorf [I think that's his name] came up with Esperanto, he had this in mind. He created Esperanto with the notion that every culture would keep it's culture and language and Esperanto would only be used to communicate with one who didn't know the local language.

In other words, the purpose of Esperanto isn't meant to suplant other langauges, just to kinda "be in reserve" if you will. Not a bad idea I think either.


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 06:11 PM by octotom
reply to post by Alora



That's funny-- I know a couple from England who, when it was mentioned that Americans speak English said, Uh, no you don't. We speak English, you speak a moshposh of languages.


Ha.

Here in Germany, I'm taking German classes since I don't know the language that well. My teacher at the beginning would ask me, "this is how [insert phrase here] is said in English, right?" Then I would say often, "No, not in American English." It got to the point, that he stopped calling my language "Englisch" and started to refer to is as "Americanisch".


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 06:41 PM by kyred
How about we all adopt Ebonics? It's quite colorful, always interesting, and it's constantly changing and creative. And, unlike Montel Williams, I pretty much understand it and enjoy the challenge of the changes. I chose to call out Montel because he has a history of claiming he doesn't understand what people mean when they speak of black music, black language, black culture, etc., in the U.S.

Seriously, though, English is often recognized as the universal language. But that can change. Why not Swahili? It's a pretty language. Really, though, basic Chinese could be the language of the future. Even in my little town, jobs for Japanese interpreters, spell check anyone? I am lazy today, are being replaced by Chinese interpreters. Same spelling, lol. Heck, the Japanese people that come here to operate and manage the various companies often speak English better than the locals, who have been raised in the public schools here.

On another hand, I sure do enjoy the sounds of a southern gal, no, not a country gal, that is just ugly and hick-like sounds. But true southern accents are quite beautiful, too.

Reminds me of when I worked at a company in Lexington, KY. and the receptionist was fired by the Yankee owners, because they were embarassed by the little gal's accent. Dumb butts didn't realize that her voice and accent was well-liked by the local contractors who did business with the company. I'm sure there is no connection, but the company did go out of business soon after the firing of the gal. But, I begin to wander in my post.


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 07:01 PM by fraterormus
I agree that Nationalism is so 19th century! We need to get with the times and scrap Nationalism altogether (and do so in a way that doesn't ruffle the feathers of the paranoid thinking it's a NWO/Illuminati/Master-Plan).

One of the first steps to doing such, other than trying things the EU style which is so progressive in a very boring way, would be to establish a universal language.

I find it amusing that Americans and Brits always seem to think that English already is the Universal language. Such ignorance is the reason we are scoffed at when we go abroad. Spanish is actually the most WIDELY spoken language and Mandarin is the one most COMMONLY spoken language in the world currently. (
Languages by Number of Speakers and Languages by Ethnologue). And let's be perfectly honest here...the only reason so many people worldwide speak English as a Third language is because the old joke about Americans and Brits is all too true...

"What do you call a person who speaks two languages?"
"Bilingual"
"What do you call a person who speaks three languages?"
"Trilingual"
"What do you call a person who speaks many languages?"
"Polylingual"
"What do you call a person who speaks only one language?"
An Englishman (or American depending on who is telling the joke)"

Bless the rest of the world for catering to our own educational inadequacies for the last century or two by learning how to speak our language when we were unwilling of learning to speak theirs!

I too, vote for Esperanto, although it may be equally as difficult for those accustomed to Pan-Asiatic languages to master, just as it is for those accustomed to 20-24 letters in the alphabet to comprehend a base 800 character language.

Maybe we should start from scratch.

[edit on 4-6-2009 by fraterormus]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^