Since you clearly get your information only from watching the news and single source reporting, I thought I would help you out so you don't look
likee a fool in the future.
When a military conducts a drill that has nothing to do with how ready to go to war they are. Often, most parts of the exercise are notional. That is
why it is a drill. You also have no details of what the drill entails. Do a little research and you will find that the "exercise" is more a fluff
show than anything.
We don't use the term mobilized. If we did than you just said that only are reserve forces are ready to go. We don't do that. Additionally there has
been minimal naval movement in response to the current north korean threat. No other movements have been made. Again a lot of public military and news
sites that shows our movements after they happen. little historical research and you will see this was probably the dumbest thing you said.
The Obama peaceful speech is a nice touch. How many other presidents, leaders, generals, and secrataries have done the same thing in the last ten
years, 5 years, last year??? Not really a good deduction.
Bin laden? Come on people. Let me help you out. Al Qaeda is not the threat you think they are. In fact not eve close to our biggest threats. Look them
up on wikipedia, and look up terrorism on the countries you list. This will help you learn who is who's ally, so you dont sound dumb. This will also
link you to other groups and you might learn something. Say for example that we have more threats against us every day from far more dangerous groups
and countries. Just look at what ol kim jong ill said about the armistice and UN intervention. That is a far greater concern to the nation.
Better read about your three terrorist groups so you know what your talking about. You will see how silly your pakistan statement was. What advanced
nukes does Iran have? DO you even know what your talking about? I bet you think ol binadajad or what ever his name is, runs the country. Do a read on
Iran's political structure and how their government works. You will be pleasantly surprised at why we dont care when Iran talks about firing him.
17000 troops was a proposed deadline for that time. Not a statement of fact. Additionally, the military doesn't confirm or quote movements like that
until complete. Also grab one of our bigger military newspapers. Every week they show who is where and in what number, not to mention how easy an
internet search it is. Get an idea of the regular rotation and you will find that there is no 17000 extra. It is a play on words and numbers, just
like the Iraq surge, almost all (there is where an actual math percentage could be used, but just for you I wont) were already scheduled to be there.
Which, like the Iraq surge, is a joke to the military because they know there is no increase.
Yes I can see the picture emerging. Here's a thought, while POTUS is gone we are not doing aynthing. If any other member of the cabinent, senior
official, or member of the joint chiefs is gone we are not foing anything. With that many service members In the middle east and the Navy moving
around, we wont do anything. WHy would we nuke the middle east when we have troops there, especially such a large percentage. I play video games to
and sacrifice a player now and then but come on, your whole starting line up. Do you have any idea the destruction of what our missles could do. we
would kill our own guys. Maybe read a little a bit about fallout, the effects on the environment and also weather patterns in your proposed target
areas at this time of year. Then you would see how bad of a theory you have. We would bring everyone home before we "nuked" something.
This would be a good time for you to shut up and color.






