It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I never said that they read nearly verbatim. That was another poster. *I* said they accord well. In other words, nothing clashes, and though not specific, necessarily, the Tablets paint a picture that the Papers fit into.
I guess I can go out and find all the translations and link them here, if that is your wish. But you will not see the story itself detailed as in the Papers, but will see things that suggest the information in the Papers.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
There is nothing but the seemingly crazy things that are explained when taking the Papers into account. There is nothing but the Sumerian Tablets...
Originally posted by Amaterasu
The Tablets are more history, accounting, and reporting, than myth. And they are a far cry from what bits and pieces were translated before.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Please quote my ad homs, please. To my knowledge, I never called anyone anything. At worst, I might have said, "In my opinion, ..." Which is not an ad hominem. If I said, "You are a ..." Now THAT is an ad hom.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
What is your investment in this, dear. It seems awfully important for you to debunk by way of obfuscation and ridicule.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
So what's your point and why is this so important to you?
Originally posted by Amaterasu
And, in fact, this whole issue has you dancing to discredit me. I want to know what's so important... Does the thought of the Papers being true scare you THAT much? Or are there other, more...spooky reasons that you are so invested in this? I just can't tell.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Until you explain your vested interest in this - I'm pretty much done addressing your words, which tend to twist and misinterpret.
Why is it so important to you to "disprove" The Terra Papers?
Originally posted by Amaterasu
An ad hominem argument...consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the source making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim.
Appeal to motive is a pattern of argument which consists in challenging a thesis by calling into question the motives of its proposer. It can be considered as a special case of the ad hominem circumstantial argument. As such, this type of argument may be a logical fallacy.
The process of proving or disproving the claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
As I have said, Star Wars came AFTER the Papers were written, and Joseph Campbell spent a lot of time with the Hopi, and was George Lucas's friend and mentor.
So instead of thinking it is somehow a ripoff, think that Star Wars borrowed from the Hopi stories of an ET giving the history of the Earth.
Originally posted by atlasastro
Edit to Add, Lucas said later Star Wars was a rewrite of the Original 1971 script and he basically ripped of Kurosawa' epic The Hidden Fortress.en.wikipedia.org...
This movie was made in 1958.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
As I have said, Star Wars came AFTER the Papers were written, and Joseph Campbell spent a lot of time with the Hopi, and was George Lucas's friend and mentor.
No... But I recommend The Terra Papers (linked in my sig). The Terra Papers were written as a term paper in the late 1960's. They were written by a Hopi, Robert Morning Sky, who was taking a course in Origins of Religion, and he needed a topic for his term paper.
When reading the Papers, it is good to know that they PREDATE Star Wars by a number of years. There are elements that will remind you of Star Wars. I suspect that is because it is likely that Joseph Campbell, one of the lead authorities on human myths and legends, spent a long while with the Hopi and may have been introduced to Bek'Ti's information.
And Joseph Campbell was a close friend and mentor of George Lucas.
Originally posted by merky
I feel this is pure fiction. You could make a movie about all this, a mix of Star Wars, Dune, and others.
I read to page four and it was the same old story with a little different spin to comply with copyright laws......
It's no wonder any of the major religions laugh at this. Insect man, fish man (aka) Aqua man, Bird man. Funny they are all called...."man".
Enough time wasted......see ya
Originally posted by kshaund
Originally posted by merky
I feel this is pure fiction. You could make a movie about all this, a mix of Star Wars, Dune, and others.
I read to page four and it was the same old story with a little different spin to comply with copyright laws......
It's no wonder any of the major religions laugh at this. Insect man, fish man (aka) Aqua man, Bird man. Funny they are all called...."man".
Enough time wasted......see ya
If you listen to Clifford Stone's question and answer in The Disclosure Project, he coincidentally says something like (paraphrasing here): At the time he left the service there were 57 documented types/species of aliens - and they looked HUMANOID which had perplexed the military as they expected aliens to look UNhuman.
He said some of them look just like us and you wouldn't know it otherwise other than exceptional senses we don't have; others are reptilian HUMANOIDS (a humanoid being a head, two arms and two legs).
They were expecting some to look like Octopus I guess - Do you know that there are species of HUMANS on earth that have no relation to another - they are a distinct species just like a cat is to a dog? Yet cats and dogs are humanoids too - a head, two arms (front feet) and two legs (hind feet).
Humanoid is the rule because it's the best way to exist!
So you stopped reading because of that.... ? Logically - even if it wasn't written until the 90's (which I absolutely disagree with), that he referred to these as humanoids and ****the military**** later says the same thing - are we supposed to believe then that the military stole the idea from the Terra Papers?
Or - could it be there's actually truth to the story..... Hmmmm.....
Originally posted by kidflash2008
I also have to state that I grew up in the 1970s, and New Age was the fad going on. Pyramid power, kirlian photography, UFOs, ancient astronauts, Atlantis and many, many other areas were "in" during that decade. I should not assume Mr Morning Sky was into the New Age, but "The Terra Papers" read very much like the authors who were into such subjects at the time.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Robert Morning sky is a fraud. The native community where he is supposedly from has never heard of him/grandfather or this supposed legend. Also the all Native people from America and Canada know he is not a native american/canadian. So where is he from.
www.newagefraud.org...
Read the posts on the website from educated indian + actual hopi legends
www.indianlegend.com/hopi/hopi_index.htm.
It is funny that there are people out there who believe his star wars ripoff of a fable.
Ahhhh. There's that forum site - again. Read a couple of my posts up. I am very suspicious of that site. Maybe if there was a more reputable site (forums are not noted for their reliability), then I might consider these claims. But that site raises my suspicions greatly.
And since the Papers were written BEFORE Star Wars... Who might be "ripping off" whom?