Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Amaterasu
I have had a great number of discussions from one who was (is) a friend of his back in 1970. She and I began our discourse shortly after I learned of
the Papers. She was aware of them in 1970.
Yes, in an effort to spread the information they were released as a booklet later in his efforts to inform us all. But the original work was from
1968 or 69.
What you have is an unsubstantiated claim. Fact, there is no evidence outside of these claims, that the Terra Papers were around before the
1990s.
Fact: There is no evidence that you'll accept that the Terra Papers were around before the 1990s. [shrug] I don't care.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
You must have missed the fact that I did NOT say "the Sumerian language." I said the "Sumerian Tablets," which are STILL being
translated.
You are arguing semantics, now. Whether tablets or the language, you ignored the fact that translations of Sumerian myth have existed since the
1940s.
LOL! Whatever. The Tablets are more history, accounting, and reporting, than myth. And they are a far cry from what bits and pieces were translated
before. What is your investment in this, dear. It seems awfully important for you to debunk by way of obfuscation and ridicule.
You also did not answer which Sumerian myths the Terra Papers supposedly mirror.
I can't answer that for the poster that posted that. Perhaps you should ask them.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
If Campbell told Lucas not to reveal any of the source, but did tell him the information he learned from the Hopi...
You are speculating. And that is all you have for the claim, confusing speculation for fact. There is zero evidence to support your
claim.
If you read what I have written, it will become fully apparent that this was educated speculation from the beginning. I never said otherwise. So
what's your point and why is this so important to you?
Originally posted by Amaterasu
It can hardly be a "legend" if it arrived via Bek'Ti in 1947
Regardless of what semantic games you want to engage in, there is no other source for these claims.
You make me laugh! Let's see...
From
www.merriam-webster.com... :
1 a: a story coming down from the past ; especially : one popularly regarded as historical although not verifiable b: a body of such stories c:
a popular myth of recent origin
It's not much passed down from the past - well 60ish years, but this is clearly referring to the distant past, so it's not "a" or "b." And it
is not popular (yet), so it's not "c." The other two definitions, not shown, are completely unrelated.
So it is not "semantics." Again, why is this so important to you?
Originally posted by Amaterasu
and if the Hopi have kept the secrets in trust, they aren't going to be blabbing them to some paleface, now are they?
And yet that is what your entire claim is based on. First you claim Robert Morning Sky is babbling these secrets. Then you claim the Hopi told
Joseph Campbell who in turn told Lucas.
These two were either given permission by a council of Elders, or were sharing something with a friend. That is not "babbling" - or "blabbing,"
for that matter. Campbell, no doubt, gained the trust of the Elders, and if he did speak to Lucas (which I think most likely), it was with the
understanding that he not share the information.
Yes, it is speculation (as I have said all along), but the connection is an interesting on given the closeness of Lucas and Campbell, and the image
Lucas presents matching so closely with the Papers.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
There is nothing but the Sumerian Tablets...
Again, tell us which Sumerian tablets, which Sumerian legends.
Again, ask the poster that claimed there was nearly a verbatim match.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
You're working awfully hard to call me a liar.
Not at all. I do not believe you are a liar. I believe you are sincere. Wrong, very wrong, but sincere.
Ha. Out of context here. You basically said I was making things up regarding my acquaintance who was a close friend of Mr. Morning Sky and who
confirmed that the Papers were written in the late '60's.
And, in fact, this whole issue has you dancing to discredit me. I want to know what's so important... Does the thought of the Papers being true
scare you THAT much? Or are there other, more...spooky reasons that you are so invested in this?
I just can't tell.
[edit on 6/4/2009 by Amaterasu]