If its a timewave of 'our' history, every single event on the timewave map should match up with so called big events in global history. Not a person losing his job for instance. Showing just 4 or 5 matching peak/events is a coincidence to me.

Can you really come up with a document which shows this match in lets say the past 2000 years? Or maybe the last 50 cause the record is available. Seems a bit random to just look at high/lows and instantly trying to find a historic event to it.

Still intrigued by the 2012 thing, seems to pop up everywhere around the world.

very interesting read! have been familiar with Timewave Zero but now my interest is really peaked!

is there anywhere on this site or perhaps another site where one can keep up to date with Timewave Zero correlations?

hmmm. I'm not buying this. Sounds like more cunning humbug from some 3rd rate academic who needs money for drugs or alcohol. Reminds me of 'The Bible Code'.

To all those looking at the Oct 26 timeframe and those looking for concrete predictions: Careful, it does not work that way.

As the OP explains carefully, it is possible to tie different events together using the harmonics within the wave itself, yes. BUT, the event space is getting closer and closer as the timewave novelty approaches zero. What does that mean? Well, it means that events are happening closer and closer but not necessarily more and more severe or anything. It also means that the events that happen today will correlate to events that may have happened within the span of an entire year back in the 1700's. (See the coil/ribbon graphic in the OP) Because of this, we can say that something may have a good likelihood of happening on a certain day, but what that event is could be related to any one of many different things that had happened during a resonant period of the past. George Ure once said something to the effect of "history does not repeat, it just rhymes". So revolutionary type behavior this summer? Yes, it could happen and it could resonate with the 1780s. A natural disaster in October? Yes, it could happen and it could resonate with the New Madrid quakes. It could also be a nuke or something else or nothing we can recognize until later in the future, who knows? A man 1000X worse than Hitler may be born. We would not know until decades later the significance!

Last December there was a big hype about a major earthquake. Both web bot and TWZ were correlating on this event and it seemed like a 'sure thing' just like this Oct 26 thing. Nothing happened though and now many think both web bot and TWZ are bunk. One can never see accurately into the future. We experience moments with only limited perspective because of our lack of knowledge of the future. For example, Yellowstone 'woke up' with a large series of small-ish tremors (aka a swarm) right around that event window last December. A swarm like this is rare but not unprecedented and right now many believe it to be a minor isolated swarm. That is fine but what would people think if YS blew its cap next October? Suddenly the swarm is significant because that was the early warning sign before the big one.

As they say: Time will tell. We will never be able to accurately predict future events but I think with all the awareness going into these synchronous events and abstract 'technologies' we may be able to develop a method to the madness to determine if these points on TWZ may be accurately mapped to important events. We will never be able to say "On a certain date, a specific event with exact consequence will occur." and be 100% accurate. I think the closest we can ever get is to say that within a certain window of time (as little as a specific day) an event will occur and it will have a 60% chance of relating to x, a 30% chance of relating to y, and a 10% chance of relating to something else.

[edit on 4-6-2009 by nydsdan]

I believe that the theory of relativity would also fit nicely into and complement this hypothesis. To create a simple example, it should seem to most people that the longer you live - the faster time will pass. For example imagine the apparent length of a year to a four year old child, it seems to take forever - now imagine the same length of a year to a forty year old person, it passes in a flash... The obvious explanation is that the relative percentage of life observed from the position of the same person at four and forty, measured in a year takes one tenth the amount of time from the initial measurement of the four year old. Time in fact is passing quicker which would be accounted for in the spiral model which could be represented mathematically as the reverse golden spiral where... r = a*e^(k*@)

or better yet...

Lets write it another way using the rules of exponents, the
exponential function, and natural logs, we can say that...


k = (2/pi) * ln(phi) moving the coefficent of the
natural log to the exponent of
= ln[phi^(2/pi)] its argument - a natural log rule



ln[phi^(2/pi)] * @
r = a * e substituting k back into
r = a*e^(k*@)


/ ln[phi^(2/pi)] \ @
= a * (e ) ) a rule of exponents
\ /

/ (2/pi) \ @
= a * (phi ) simplifying the inside using a
\ / natural log rule

[(2/pi) * @]

r = a * phi a rule of exponents





[edit on 4-6-2009 by SaraThustra]

all you have realy done is make a meaningless graph and cherrypick events - totaly arbritary and pointless

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
all you have realy done is make a meaningless graph and cherrypick events - totaly arbritary and pointless

It isn't arbitrary and pointless, the timeline is a mathematical fact as you can see in my above post. The innovation is in applying the event model to the timeline.

It is what it is.

Thanks for this post, it's great!.

Also we have the same birthday.

I'll comment later when I'm not so tired.

I have so no fecking clou what ya talkin bout. But thos graphics look kinda sexy, arnt they?

First of all, this a very well written thread.

I'm new to the timewave zero philosophy and didn't really know what it is all about.
This thread brought much clarity. Thank you!

Two questions regarding the program:

1. Who wrote it and when?
2. What kind of data flows into this program and when started it. What is the initial time reference used to reflect future movements?

Thank you.