It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Retseh
I see that William Rutledge is still pulling in the suckers with his fake Apollo 20 videos.
You guys do know that he also has a video of himself doing a lunar EVA, right?
So this is how you debunk the statements made by Dr. Mitchell?
This is how you smear his name?
You should be truly ashamed of yourself to sink this low.
Shame on you.
Some ufologists, for example Allan Hendry, the Center for UFO Studies' chief investigator, have found Klass' view of a witness' veracity a fairly dependable measure of a report's significance as an item of UFO evidence. "Insulting ad hominem attacks on the witness' basic reliability" are, Hendry says, "one way to gauge the strength of a case." If a would-be debunker cannot break the case except by attacking the witness' integrity, chances are the sighting is a good one.
Mitchell earned a Bachelor of Science degree in industrial management from Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1952. The following year he joined the US Navy where he trained as a pilot and flew off the aircraft carriers USS Bon Homme Richard and USS Ticonderoga. He later qualified as a research pilot and taught at the Navy's research pilot school. While on active duty in the Navy, he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in aeronautical engineering from the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School and a Doctor of Science degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Originally posted by Haydn_17
The moon would be perfect for aliens to observe earth.
The thing is, why did they leave?
Originally posted by breakingdradles
Please find this video and post it.
You have me interested.
Originally posted by SaraThustra
If these things are real... I do not believe that they are extraterrestrial, I believe that they are more likely relics from a previous existence of humans on Earth, same with the pyramids for that matter.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
The people who call "HOAX" will usually fall into three categories:
1. Folks who are here simply to discredit. This would be pawns of intelligence operations who are just conducting their jobs.
2. Folks who are just not able to infuse the new information into their current reality. This would be folks that the Brookings report referred to (not many here on ATS, but we all know them in our real life)
3. Folks who are just trolls. They have little to add to the discussion and instead choose to come here just to do the old "swoop and poop" (like seagulls, they come in, crap all over everything, and then fly back out like nothing happened).
I will leave it up to you on how to classify individual posters.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
If the Apollo 20 video tapes supposedly taken and released by William Rutledge are fake then I would be interested to know where the hoaxer found a full size LEM from in which he shot his footage. I would also congratulate him on being so precise when it came to creating a 3D moon landscape over which he filmed the descent of the lunar lander. Creating all this must have cost him at least a few hundred thousand pounds, and who would spend that type of money on a hoax which they could never claim?
I think the whole Apollo 20 story has a nugget of truth at it's core surrounded by the usual bulls**t.