Are Americans really so ignorant they need the government to baby sit them?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 3-6-2009 @ 07:43 PM by Sundancer
Do people really want freedom or have they become so ignorant they need the government to baby sit them?
If there was a state that offered these freedoms would you move there? Do we really need to have this Democrat/ Republican division or are people adult enough to able to come together to govern themselves? What would you ad to the list?

In this state the law will be...

If you don't want a gun don't own one, but don't take mine.
If you don't want an abortion don't have one, let me answer to my God only, should I choose to have one.

You will also have the right to...

The right to protect YOUR property by WHATEVER means you deem necessary
The right to marry if your gay
The right to celebrate CHRISTMAS
The right to decide if you choose to allow smoking in your establishment
The right to assisted suicide
The right to choose whether to wear a helmet or a seat belt
The right to home school your children or not to send them to school at all if you so choose
The right to spank your children - No government agency will be allowed to remove your children for any reason.
The right to pray or not to pray at school and sporting events.
The right to let your property fall into disrepair if you so choose.
The same flat tax rate for rich or for poor.
The right to vote on where your tax dollars are spent.
The right to be represented by an all volunteer government with term limits. Accepting payment from any special interests will be a felony. Lobbying of any kind will be a felony.
No warrant less searches, no spying on US Citizens.

EDIT to add from Idyserenity


The right to DECIDE if you want car insurance or not...but then if you have an accident to take responsibility yourself, if you are at fault.
The right to decide if you want to put your income into SS or to put it in a bank/ira/stock to save for your retirement.
The right to decide if you want to put your income in a welfare system or to put it away yourself to be used if needed later/ie. lay offs or getting cut from work...etc.
How about the right for fishing and gaming as long as one does not take more than they need to survive without paying umpteen amounts of $$$ for stinking permits?




[edit on 3-6-2009 by Sundancer]


reply posted on 3-6-2009 @ 08:52 PM by whaaa
reply to post by Sundancer




You know what's ironic? The mythical country you described sounds a lot like MEXICO except for the last 3 you mentioned.

If I could make a decent living in Mexico it would be "hasta la vista" for old whaaa. A lot of my well off friends spend a lot of time there in condos they own free and clear.


reply posted on 3-6-2009 @ 09:09 PM by David9176
reply to post by bismarcksea





Watch the movie "Idiocracy" and you tell me.


I mentioned this movie in another thread 2 days ago and i'm seeing it pop up in a few threads by others. It's just like the movie! (which is quite good btw)

Everyone is so dumbed down.

"It has electrolytes."


reply posted on 3-6-2009 @ 09:11 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by whaaa



You're right it does sound a lot like Mexico, I live there and travel all over Central America (my job.) The whole of Mexico is a lot different than the border regions that most people see. People on average are willing to work hard for an honest days pay and neighbors take care of neighbors. They don't expect or want the government to step in. In Mexico people would rather check themselves to see if a bench has wet paint than have the government raise taxes to put up a wet paint sign.

Why couldn't this same system work in the states in a state where the people demanded and expected this along with the last three items mentioned of course.


reply posted on 3-6-2009 @ 10:04 PM by ldyserenity
Originally posted by Sundancer
Do people really want freedom or have they become so ignorant they need the government to baby sit them?
If there was a state that offered these freedoms would you move there? Do we really need to have this Democrat/ Republican division or are people adult enough to able to come together to govern themselves? What would you ad to the list?

In this state the law will be...

If you don't want a gun don't own one, but don't take mine.
If you don't want an abortion don't have one, let me answer to my God only, should I choose to have one.

You will also have the right to...

The right to protect YOUR property by WHATEVER means you deem necessary
The right to marry if your gay
The right to celebrate CHRISTMAS
The right to decide if you choose to allow smoking in your establishment
The right to assisted suicide
The right to choose whether to wear a helmet or a seat belt
The right to home school your children or not to send them to school at all if you so choose
The right to spank your children - No government agency will be allowed to remove your children for any reason.
The right to pray or not to pray at school and sporting events.
The right to let your property fall into disrepair if you so choose.
The same flat tax rate for rich or for poor.
The right to vote on where your tax dollars are spent.
The right to be represented by an all volunteer government with term limits. Accepting payment from any special interests will be a felony. Lobbying of any kind will be a felony.
No warrant less searches, no spying on US Citizens.



I thought this thread was going to tick me off... but I read it and now I agree all very good points I'll S&F~!


reply posted on 3-6-2009 @ 10:08 PM by Sundancer
You said you didn't believe that people should be alowed to let their property fall into disrepair because
That's totally childish, and a lack of respect to neighbourS ! !
reply to
post by C-JEAN


I believe it's disrespectful also. however I also believe that water seeks its own level and that most people paying for clean homes in clean neighborhoods won't be dealing with this issue. I also believe that when you stop all the handouts and people get back into the swing of working for what they have, they'll have a lot more pride in the things they own. At least that's been my experience from what I've seen in countries where EVERYONE works for a days pay.

You believe that people should be forced to wear a seat belt so it doesn't cost you money. I believe that we have to give and take equally. The whole point of this post is to see if people really do want freedom not just for themselves but for everyone else as well. To see if we could find common ground and govern ourselves or if we're truly as divided as the government says we are.


reply posted on 3-6-2009 @ 11:48 PM by Sundancer
reply to post by ldyserenity



Thanks for the additions. I added to them to the post. Utah used to give you the option of not carrying auto insurance if you chose not to. I'm not sure if that's still the case but another poster said that they had the lowest insurance rates in the country because of this.


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 12:00 AM by ldyserenity
Originally posted by Jenna
Originally posted by Sundancer
No government agency will be allowed to remove your children for any reason.


This is the only part that I have a problem with at a glance. There are definitely reasons for children to be removed from the home. Child abuse (whether physical, sexual, or emotional/mental) and dangerous living conditions are valid reasons for a child to be taken away from the parents. There is a difference between a spanking and a beating, but once you cross the line over into abusing your child instead of disciplining them it's time for someone to step in and stop you.

I'm not trying to change the topic, just stating why I disagree with this line. Other than that, your list sounds good to me.



yeah that's a very valid point, but with the option being open for abortion, well some of those numbers of abuse would be greatly reduced I think. Also it used to be a more extended family living situation long ago, which kept abuse down to a minimum, with the rest of the extended family helping in the burden of raising children and also getting psychological help for abusers and such. I think a lot of cases are a direct result of the living situation in America now. Poverty, less education(prenatal, childcare,etc), More stress, more drugs, less family involvement(Ie grandparents etc) The list goes on and on. I mean the family Of Susan Smith could see that she was unstable, but they didn't want to intervene, hell, they didn't want to even call dcf on her, to have them intervene. This is a lot of the cause.


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 12:02 AM by jitombe
reply to post by Sundancer



All of your points could become a reality only if states actually had rights that the fed govt could not over-rule as they do now. If that was the case, I would move to the state that was right for me, as long as it's not Alaska. Too damn cold up there and I have no respect for the people of a state whose majority thinks Palin is intelligent in any manner and is fit to be in charge of anything. Whatever happened to state's rights and the fed not interfering?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 9 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 10 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 2 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags