It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.davidicke.com...
let's try to figure out what the alleged nano-thermite paint would do if it actually worked as speculated and you applied some to a steel column and managed to ignite it somehow.
Data. The paper gives a large range of values for available energy, but the highest is 7 kilojoules per gram. We'll use that one.
My steel box column will measure 14 inches by 14 inches by 11 feet 6 inches (0.36 meters by 0.36 meters by 3.5 meters). I'll have the thickness of the steel be 1/4 inch (0.64 centimeters).
The density of steel is 7900 kilograms per cubic meter.
The box column has a volume (minus the empty space inside) of 0.032 cubic meters. That means that the beam is comprised of about 250 kilograms of steel.
The surface area of the four outer faces of the beam is about 50 square feet. One gallon of paint covers about 400 square feet -- at least according to the label of a can of house paint I just checked. So the total paint on the beam will be about 0.12 gallons, or 466 grams' worth. Let's round that up to 500 grams.
We have 7,000 joules per gram of paint, and 500 grams of paint. The total available energy is 3,500,000 joules.
The question before us is, how much will that amount of energy raise the temperature of the steel due to combustion of the "nano-thermite" paint?
If you'll kindly consult your physics books, you'll find that the increase in temperature of a material equals the energy input, divided by the mass of the material multiplied by the material's specific heat capacity:
Delta-T = E / cm
Where Delta-T is the temperature change, E is the energy input, m is the mass of the material, and c is the material's specific heat capacity.
The specific heat capacity for steel is 460 joules per kilogram-Celsius (from table 17-1 of my copy of Schaum's 3000 Solved Problems in Physics).
We now have all three values needed to solve our equation:
Delta-T = 3,500,000 J/ (250 kg * 460 J/kg*C)
Delta-T = temperature of steel increases by 30 degrees celsius.
Yeah, that's going to do a lot.
M
[edit on 2-9-2009 by mmiichael]
Originally posted by NIcon
Doesn't exactly say how high the energy content could be, but it's an interesting statement by the Navy, telling me there's a problem with the theoretical number of 3.9 kJ/g.
Originally posted by turbofan
With respect to the thermite paper, the scientists used 55 mL/min. of
air flow which is not very much at all. Any additional thermal energy
from air flow would be quite insignificant compared to the aluminothermic
reaction.
Coincidently, Scholars wrote back and said they are still trying to have
someone visit us here to explain these points further, however most
are busy on speaking engagements and performing tests with other
researchers.
I had a chance to fire off the question about the maximum temperature
change possible with 55 mL/min of air flow. I'll be looking forward to that
answer and so will a certain anonymous "expert" within this thread.
Originally posted by turbofan
Spheres attached to partially ignited chips = nano-thermite found by the scientists.
Have you found a paint that can do this yet?
www.sciforums.com...
Harrit doesn't prove that the Spheres are Iron, he assumes they're Iron, just like he assumed that the Kaolinite was aluminium.
He describes metallic spheres, and translucent blue spheres.
He then examines the metallic spheres, predetermining that they're Iron, while completely ignoring the translucent blue spheres - once again, he's examining the evidence in accordance with his beliefs.
Hematite is also metallic and forms spheres:
According to
geography.lancs.ac.uk...
We have, according to the page:
“Magnetite spherule (m) which contains hematite lamellae (brighter). This is welded to an unidentified iron oxide phases, one having metallographic skeletal textures (s) and the other containing small (~2mm) spheres that consist of metallic iron [SEM-EDS]. XRD also indicates wustite (spherule diameter 60mm). [RL optical, oil immersion]”
And take a look at the category that the photo occurs under:
“Anthropogeneic Magnetic Minerals"
fly-ash (combustion products), ferrous contamination “
Get it? We can expect metallic iron rich spheres to form when we burn hydrocarbons that are contaminated with iron.
Also note that this explanation has the advantage of being able to naturally explain the varying ratios of Iron:Oxygen found in the spheres that Harrit examined (their composition was highly variable, and only one or two of them came close to resembling the ratios of Fe:O found in the byproducts of the Thermite he examined.
Also, may I recommend you take note of the following chemistry:
3 Fe2 O3 + C > 2 Fe3 O4 + CO
Fe3 O4 + C > 3 Fe O + CO
(or Carbon Monoxide can substitute for Carbon)
The production of Iron doesn't necessarily require high temperatures, it can be done naturally, it requires a strongly reducing environment.
Veins of native Iron, although unusual to be found, because of how quickly Iron oxidizes, can be desposited hydrothermally.
So no, I'm not necessarily suggesting that the Linseed oil ignited and caused molten Iron to form.
I am, however, suggesting that the Linseed oil did play a role in setting the conditions necessary, and played a role in the production of the of the spheres, which Harrit failed to demonstrate were anything more than spheres of Iron Oxide produced as a combustion by-product.
[...]
Harrit did mess up his investigation, he himself admits he messed up in some areas.
I've outlined some other short comings in his paper.
Being Iron rich doesn't contradict anything that I've said.
I haven't said that the spheres were exclusively Iron Oxide, in fact, I've repeatedly pointed out that the fly ash ESM that I posted earlier contains Iron particles in it (in it's metallic form). In fact a 2:1 ratio of Fe:O can be trivially accounted for by the formula Fe.FeO
The closest I've come is stating that Iron Rich does not automatically imply metallic Iron. I've also said that high temperatures are not the only way of producing Iron, all that is required is a sufficiently reducing environment.
Well, here's a patent issued in 2000
www.patentstorm.us...
that uses additives to create a strongly reducing environment that enables the extraction of Iron from Iron oxides with an optimal operating range of temperatures 650-790°C easily within the range of hydrocarbons.
Flames can be a strongly reducing environment, they tend to produce lots of thick, black smoke, which is primarily carbon.
Hmm, and what's one of the reactions listed on the patent?
FeO + C > Fe + CO
... looks like I forgot to list that reaction in my list of reactions
Originally posted by turbofan
reply to post by pteridine
1+1 = 2
Spheres attached to partially ignited chips = nano-thermite found by the scientists.
Have you found a paint that can do this yet?
Hey Pt., can you explain aluminothermic reaction for me please? I'm at a loss for how/why this happened within the elements found in the CHIPS.
Originally posted by turbofan
reply to post by pteridine
How do you know the max. temp if you don't know the MASS!!!!?
Move along Pt.
Please see the paper for proof of reaction.
Please come back when you can find a paint that can produce iron spheres
attached to paint chips.
[edit on 7-9-2009 by turbofan]
Originally posted by turbofan
You know what has slipped your mind? The iron spheres explanation ( you
know...how they attach themselves to paint?).
When are you going to put forth a paint which exhibits all of which Harrit/Jones found?
What's this about quantity and heat Pt.? What are you trying to say?
1 pound of thermite cannot produce more heat than 1 gram of thermite?
Originally posted by turbofan
Don't ignore it, because it's true and once again highlighted by your response!
Ptridine needs to explain the following to prove he is correct and Jones is a fool. These questions will continue to reappear until Pt. understands:
- How do the iron spheres form if not by extreme temps of a quick thermal
transition caused by an aluminothermic reaction
- The spheres are attached to partially reacted chips which occured during
chemical reaction. If not by this method, Pt. needs to explain what heat
source was available to:
a. form the spheres
b. mechanically attach them to the chips
- Since air cannot produce a narrow exotherm as seen in the DSC trace,
Pt. will need to explain how combustion could cause such a narrow
exotherm.
After these questions are answered, Pt. or any one else in his crew need
to come up with a reasonable alternative to explain elements, backscatter,
pre/post ignition analysis of the chips which point to a nano-thermite
(or at least incendiary).