NASA Moon Anomalies *new video* Lunar Orbiter Pictures

New movie I made after viewing 6 gig (450x14mb) size Lunar Orbiter photos. I have over 350 of anomalies but limited it to about 75. Should I make another? I guess this thread shall tell (and youtube).

I am 100% convinced there is at the very least ruins of structures, mining and equipment. And at the best guess a continued existence of races "fixing" their craft (the moon). To me I believe a huge battle took place on this artificial craft which can be seen by the bizare and odd craters that look 'blown-out' like the glass domes protecting these huge crater cities have been turned to dust.

There is so much about the moon that can not be explained, that it can become an obsession like a 911 truther that gets their first taste of reality - you just want to hunt down more and more info. Where do you go? Obviously not NASA.


Please be constructive if critical. Simple one off remarks give no justice to the time I have spent glaring at the screen into the morning hours - the time I have neglected to do "normal" stuff. If you don't see anything - that is fine. I am not forcing you to see or believe anything here. But this is what I see and think is happening on the moon.

Oh yeah you can view these photos here : ser.sese.asu.edu...

And if anyone has a link to the same size and quality of the other LO pics - PLEASE post them here so I can view some more. Perhaps I should ask NASA for a pay rise?

....enjoy!



wZn

Definitely compelling structures!

Straight lines / antennas / masts alone are enough to say "creation". I'd be looking for more lines / masts for sure. Cylinders & walls, oh yeah. Something at least WAS happening on the moon.

And the obligatory, "Who was the music artist?".

Starred and flagged.

reply to post by Atlantican


Thanks! The song is by The Doves - Kingdom Of Rust (Prins Thomas Mix)

Here is a montage I made from another thread - but wait until it FULLY loads to see the full image.

img9.imageshack.us...



wZn

Whilst alot of what that video contains, I'm struggling to see the anomolies. I'm still giving you a star and a flag for making the video, as there's a couple of pictures in there that are pretty darn compelling. But i'm sorry to say, that most of what I see in that video, looks nothing more than shadows cast by rocks and stuff.

Sorry my ADD kicked in about three minutes into the movie. I tried, I really did but I've got nothin. I have a very difficult time seeing things that just aren't there.

Nice clip. Would you be so kind as to check out mine. It only strenghens what you already know from what we see from a distance. These are images I have obtained from the same website.
Nearly of the structures on the moon have suffered explosion damage just prior to being covered by a land slide. Not much was left unscathed.

Also, the ancients used the craters for living inside of. They grooved out the cliff face like an open-cut mine and built structures and statues and tunnel systems etc. Going by Richard Haogland's evidence of glass dome ruins, it it likely that water was dropped on the glass dome that sealed in the oxygen from the vacuum of space. Just like pouring water onto very cold glass, Crack, smash. Or in this case Crack, Smash, Boom!
Evidence of this can be observed by looking at the moon through a telescope. Fire cracker-like marks can be seen surrounding the affected craters, looking very similar to marks left behind by a firecracker exploding on concrete. Water rebounding off the surface also made new craters. Evidence of this is also be seen
as the craters in question will have cross like mounds in the middle which I believe are made by the possible force of the water collapsing in on itself as the crater is formed.

reply to post by Acidtastic


Glad you bought that up. The best way to understand what you are seeing in some of these images is to actually view 20 or so images - let your eyes adjust. You then get a better point of view - you get a scale and depth of the craters especially.

There was a pattern that emerged. For a start most craters have nothing in them - they seem ice cream scooped. Then the craters with anything in them also take patterns - those with smooth and seemly attached natural appearance, and then those that intrude and have space between pipe like structures as shown. This is unexplainable. How could these formations appear naturally?

Which images did you find compelling - we should concentrate thinking on what is rather than what is not.

wZn

Nice vid. Some pretty strange stuff goes on up there on the moon. It is always good to see someone trying to expose it.

reply to post by Exoviewer


Hi Exoviewer. Some of the stuff you have is interesting - and some really seems unbelievable. The figures in particular seem to stretch even my imagination. I'm not saying what you see isn't there, it just seems in scale to be unfathomable. But then again, who knows what "they" build and for what reasons.

thanks for your vids mate.



wZn

Thank you for one of the most respectful replies I've had for the last six months regarding this topic and thankyou for having an open mind.

reply to post by Exoviewer


What do you think these massive structures are for?

I believe the moon was made from a large meteor/asteroid - kind of hollowed out, or heated and blown like a glassblower would to achieve a hollow effect. They then mine these minerals naturally found on the (moon) base/craft and use them for power or actual material to build/rebuild structure there.

I think there were major wars there eons ago, and it is not at the full capacity the occupiers would like it to be - and a small part of me thinks the moon could be the Nibiru we have all been looking for. Just a theory.

wZn

Thank you again for asking.
I belief that the moon was deliberately put there for the purpose of rotational balance and protection from space debre. As for the structures, it is very broard. I believe going by what I have seen from all of the images taken by Lunar Orbiter 5, that they were for work and Daily living. The structures that Ive seen that are very arty in archicture I believe are for living in and the structures that are boxy are for manufacturing etc, some of which appear to be be under ground as Ive seen huge colapsed roofs that if had not colapsed, you would never had suspected. This one from what I gather, was for Communications or something similar. Maybe even a turret gun of sorts, as it looks like the ruins of such things.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5f8769f7b1cc.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f6c6bff3c293.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/82bde078faeb.jpg[/atsimg]

Pretty cool huh

Here's one for your next collection / compilation ...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b32257292634.jpg[/atsimg]


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/630aa90e2852.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by Exoviewer


Woah that is a doozy! So much to discuss on this - I will put up some of my images later to share with you. It's a pity the highlighting has been on a hoax Apollo 20 mission (on another thread) that is obviously misinfo/disinfo. guess the black (PO) boys have squashed discussion on my thread (credit due..). But I'll just keep posting LO pics on here to talk about.

That tower you have reminds me of the Zond-3 image of that huge spike seen on the moon - perhaps this was it?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ab3e09e33734.jpg[/atsimg]

Amazing find - and the tanks! Thanks for these images - really impressed.

You have a keen vision. keep posting!



wZn

I just don't get how these can be natural?

hexagon craters
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/84483bcf2c1daad5.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/c5fead49181f7fa9.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/c0fad8ca20991cb8.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/15b188a17ba2a8d7.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/d161ba87cd4f1992.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/f636ec2d093fa401.jpg[/atsimg]
...are just a few of the more obvious ones - there are many!



wZn

Thank you sir, I certainly will and nice pics. Images seen from a height are just as significant as the close-ups in my opinion. Don't be discouraged completely by that neysayer. The interior Apollo vids have nothing to compare with really, therefor are still up in the air. But as for the Concord looking craft which I don't believe is crashed but was docked or parked before getting mudcovered by huge water balls dropped from above or by lava balls which evidently caused the pock marks on the gold structured craft, both the environments in the video of apollo 20 and the official apollo images match perfectly. Therefor I have to believe that the apollo 20 video of both the fly over and the closup fly over are credible and real. The city clip, I believe is also real as it matches an official anomalous image of three large pillars and one short pillar that is known as the castle, but dont quote me on that name. I'll post the comparisons soon.

reply to post by Exoviewer


Finally I can disagree with you on something! I feel the Apollo 20 thing is a disinfo designed to confuse researchers like you and I - and like how NASA infused real with fake moon pictures to keep us looking over there while something over here is the real deal.

I often find the Apollo photos of the moon seemed smooth and never show the rough jagged appearance the LO pics detail. I'd love to see a full catalog of the LO photos - which were so detailed and fabulous. Especially some of the ones I can't seem to find from George Leonards book 'Somebody Else Is On The Moon'. That in itself is strange. Also the photos Alex collier uses in his mars Moon lecture - I can never pin point that base - he says they are from LO4 - but I have the NASA 206 (600 images) 1969 lunar Atlas and I still can't find them. You got any ideas on those ones?



wZn

Originally posted by gravedodger
Here's one for your next collection / compilation ...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b32257292634.jpg[/atsimg]


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/630aa90e2852.jpg[/atsimg]

So I want to know what you think is in this image?! It is an Apollo one (that's OK ) - you certainly can see the gap between what ever it is and what is is attached to? Bizarre! Thanks!

wZn

Hey dude, I understand and respect your opinion. I thought the same thing too when I first saw them. Which is why Im still sus on the Mona lisa vids. That been said, Im still conflicted as to whether or not they are all real. If the craft and the city are real to me, then the mona lisa might be as well. But We'll never now until Disclosure time at the end of the day. Until then wrap your laughing gear around these comparisons of the apollo 20 craft and city.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/388452bc723c.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1ff21e4c4c1d.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/43c3f6f379c5.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/02e54708a47f.jpg[/atsimg]

You will notice that the terrian on the craft comparison match beautifully and the distant towers image and the apollo 20 towers are very similar. Similar enough to raise an eye brow at least.
So this is why I'm not convinced that the apollo 20 vids are hoaxes. I can't look past the evidence. Unless the original craft image is a hoax which is unlikely. Not trying to convince you otherwise, just adding more info to the table.