It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The US is "prepared" to engage in a 'conventional' war with North Korea but it requires time to adjust to the new front, says the military.
Gen. George Casey appearing at the Center for Strategic and International Studies on Thursday said the US was ready to enter an old-fashioned war with North Korea if necessary.
Full Article Here
Originally posted by NathanNewZealand
reply to post by phi1618
America would be very hard-pressed to battle a conventional war with North Korea. It's not Iraq. They are actually a highly organised and highly trained military force, not a 'joke' like Iraq. North Korea has massive and well equipped air force and navys. They have a standing army of 3.6 million soldiers, the largest in the world. They have heaps and heaps of combat and support vehicles and they're extremely fanatical.
I personally don't believe that the USA could win a conventional war against North Korea in North Korea. They would have to use unconventional weapons. Unless of course the USA was willing to sacrifice something like 2-4 million soldiers, which it doesn't have nowadays.
Here's some advice to the USA. Use nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive strike against North Korea, today.
Also, a lot of weak, politically correct, left wing pussies whinge and moan when 6000 soldiers die in Iraq over a period of 6 years, they think that's a high body count. In ww2 some battles claimed hundreds of thousands of soldiers in a single day. In a single day. This would be the kind of losses you can expect froma conventional war in North Korea. Are the liberals ready for that? I don't think so.
The US ready for 'conventional war' with North Korea? No, they're not!
[edit on 1-6-2009 by NathanNewZealand]
I'm surprised the U.S. has not began assaulting North Korea yet, didn't take them long to decide to invade Iraq or Afghanistan. Oh yeah that's because they also have lots of oil and figured it would be an easy sweep, but we all know how that turned out.
Originally posted by NathanNewZealand
reply to post by phi1618
America would be very hard-pressed to battle a conventional war with North Korea. It's not Iraq. They are actually a highly organised and highly trained military force, not a 'joke' like Iraq. North Korea has massive and well equipped air force and navys. They have a standing army of 3.6 million soldiers, the largest in the world. They have heaps and heaps of combat and support vehicles and they're extremely fanatical.
I personally don't believe that the USA could win a conventional war against North Korea in North Korea. They would have to use unconventional weapons. Unless of course the USA was willing to sacrifice something like 2-4 million soldiers, which it doesn't have nowadays.
Here's some advice to the USA. Use nuclear weapons in a pre-emptive strike against North Korea, today.
Also, a lot of weak, politically correct, left wing pussies whinge and moan when 6000 soldiers die in Iraq over a period of 6 years, they think that's a high body count. In ww2 some battles claimed hundreds of thousands of soldiers in a single day. In a single day. This would be the kind of losses you can expect froma conventional war in North Korea. Are the liberals ready for that? I don't think so.
The US ready for 'conventional war' with North Korea? No, they're not!
[edit on 1-6-2009 by NathanNewZealand]
Originally posted by eniac
Meanwhile left-wing pussies whinge about deaths moreso when kids die for f***-all. In WW2 there was a point to it all. Anyway, I doubt that General dude was talking about sending in the boys on horseback with swords, or trench warfare, or whatever your gung-ho, glorious vision of conventional warfare is.