It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by heliosprime
So youobviously agree with the NAZI's...
Nazi eugenics were Nazi Germany's racially-based social policies that placed the improvement of the race through eugenics at the center of their concerns and targeted those humans they identified as "life unworthy of life" (German Lebensunwertes Leben), including but not limited to the criminal, degenerate, dissident, feeble-minded, homosexual, idle, insane, religious, and weak, for elimination from the chain of heredity. More than 400,000 people were sterilized against their will, while 70,000 were killed in the Action T4.[1]
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Jadette
I have rarely read a thread on ATS that's made me as angry as this one has. I'm going to be careful what I say, because my gut instinct would mostly likely get me banned, and I've enjoyed my time here far to much to put that at risk.
But I will say this: this is terrorism. It's as much about creating fear and oh, wait for it...terror, as it is about committing murder. Don't try and make it seem like some high moral act. I'm sure every muslim terrorist would be martyr will tell you the same sorts of things. Murdering someone because you don't believe as they do, is a cowardly, filthy act of vigilantism. This man didn't break the law. You don't like what he did, you get the law changed - you don't take it into your own hands.
Originally posted by KarlG
It's a logical argument, because if you don't adopt these babies, and I don't adopt these babies, and ALL these ATS-ers on this forum MAY NOT be adopting these babies... who does?!
Maybe a few. One, or two, or three. Or a hundred. How many babies are born each day? Hundreds?
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
reply to post by WhatTheory
Do you feel that all your rights are included in the constitution? Obviously they're not. That's why the constitution has an amendment for unenumerated rights.
I know you'd probably love me to leave.
But it's my body and my life, and in my opinion both of those things transcend the rules set by the country that I live in.
You know, kind of like how some guys think it's okay to break laws about murder just to kill people who they think are killing awesome masses of tissue.
By the way, you don't need an abortion doctor to miscarry your baby.
*shrug*
They are unborn. They are defenseless. They're not babies. They can't survive on their own. They have no life experiences. And up to the end of the second trimester, they really are more like animal-like tumors than humans. They have tails, they're undeveloped, they're about as human as sperm.
Originally posted by Jadette
I have rarely read a thread on ATS that's made me as angry as this one has.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Just because a woman was irresponsible and did not keep her legs closed or because the child will be a orphan is no reason to kill babies.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
As I pointed out in a previous post, there are other options besides adoption. First of all, the woman could 'man-up' and take responsibility for her child and raise it either on her own or with the help of her friends and family. Government assistance is more than plentiful in these cases.
Just because a woman was irresponsible and did not keep her legs closed or because the child will be a orphan is no reason to kill babies.
Originally posted by Sonya610
LOL...you don't even TRY to hide your disdain for women!
Is that how they talk at pro-life rallys? Women that can't keep their legs closed? Blatant misogynism? It is pretty ugly.
How DARE those women have sex!
Men can have sex all they like but women CANNOT!!!!
Originally posted by drwizardphd
What about situations where the baby is doomed to die upon delivery, due to a medical condition? Should the mother be forced to "man-up" and deliver a corpse?
What about situations where the mother will die if she delivers the baby? Should she be forced to "man-up" and die, likely along with the child? How does the government assist her then?
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
Alright then. Enjoy your simple perfect world.
Guess you don't have a logical response since all you can do is put together a one liner.
How is that comment even relevant? I don't know what world you live in but it sure isn't reality.
Using your flawed logic, are you saying that these young single moms should not take responsibility for their actions and not ask for their family to help them. Are you saying they are not offered government assistance?
So please enlighten us with your vast wisdom and tell us of this 'perfect world' of yours.
I gave you some options for your specific scenario yet you offer none. Oh wait, your option is to kill the babies. Got it.
[edit on 5/31/2009 by WhatTheory]
Originally posted by CuriousSkeptic
Nah, I just think you're a small minded fanatic with no concept of any sort of reality except your own and who my words would be wasted on. So what's the point of even engaging you dialogue as has been evidenced in the last four pages of this thread.
But the whores just need cross their legs! Seriously, how old are you?