It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Does this look like a military plane

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 30 2009 @ 07:41 PM
link   
people said it was a remote controlled military plane , does this look like a military plane ?

its a 767 United airline jet, i think

.what other plane could it be , they aren't any other military jets that looks like a 767




[edit on 30-5-2009 by dino1989]




posted on May, 30 2009 @ 09:13 PM
link   
*sighs again*

No, it does NOT look like a military plane for the millionth time. It looks like a 767 getting ready to crash and kill alot of innocent people.

This looks like a military plane:




And yes, the airforce uses a type of 767 for tanker transport, the KC-767. It looks like this:





posted on May, 30 2009 @ 09:44 PM
link   
The military version of the 767 known as (in USAF designation) as a
KC-767 has a extendable refuelling boom under the tail

Foreign versions used wingtip pods holding the refuelling equipment

By the way the KC-767 did not as yet exist in 2001 - only on paper
as a propsal to various airforces including the USAF. First orders
came in 2001 from Italy for delivery in 2005 Japan later ordered 4

Boeing only builds aircraft for which there are firm orders for

Flight tests were only completed in 2007 after problems surfaced with
air flow around the refuelling boom required extensive redesign and testing

www.strategypage.com...

www.strategypage.com...



posted on May, 30 2009 @ 10:06 PM
link   
than why did the loose change guy say it was a military plane ?

so how could the US remote control an air plane in to the skyscraper ? I'm pretty sure you can't do that on a 767, plus they did have the technology back in 2001, but it was only on a small plane

[edit on 30-5-2009 by dino1989]



posted on May, 30 2009 @ 10:09 PM
link   
reply to post by dino1989
 


Because the Loose Change guys are idiots?



posted on May, 30 2009 @ 10:15 PM
link   
and they cant take the refueling boon off the kc-767? i imagine if they could elaborately plan this whole thing off they might also put the effort to take a refueling boon off a plane. or im pretty sure the government can get there hands on a 767.



posted on May, 30 2009 @ 10:16 PM
link   
www.youtube.com...

than why did the eye witness say it was a cargo or a military plane



posted on May, 30 2009 @ 10:18 PM
link   
reply to post by justanothergangster2
 


Boeing KC-767 didn't exist in 2001



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 07:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by dino1989
 


Because the Loose Change guys are idiots?


Thank you.


dino, do you believe everything you see or hear on the internet?



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 07:13 AM
link   
reply to post by dino1989
 


Why did people misidentify the aircraft?

Most people are not skilled in aircraft recognition. Add in high speed and
distance will compound the mistake

The "military plane" theory came because somebody said could not
see any windows in plane - therefore must be some kind of military
plane....


Now look at this - don't see any windows !




Now is it a military plane?

Or this one? Its a cargo variant 767 - no windows here




new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join