It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Neutrinos have been observed originating from a supernova just as the light arrives. However, a neutrino does have a small, detectable mass. If its arrival coincides with light from an exploding star, how is that possible.
Neutrinos are actually emitted prior to the explosion. They have a very small, but non zero mass. Being that small, any push sends them flying off at near the speed of light. Neutrinos travel slower than light, but not greatly so.
Originally posted by wonderworld
It's a fact that prior to 1980 they set off Atmospheric atomic nuclear bombs. I know it’s a bit off topic but the dust does come back down to earth. It causes negative health related illnesses. Thyroid cancer is one off the top of my head.
There is a difference from crop dusting and dusting an entire grid area. There are trace minerals located on the ground where spraying has occurred.
Originally posted by wonderworld
Since we have a medical person on board maybe we can start discussing molecular structures and substances found in chemtrails, that are not present in a higher altitude contrail.
Originally posted by wonderworld
Then you do know the basics of a contrail?
One of the main differences between a contrail and a chemtrail is a unit called a neutrino. Do you know what I mean?
Originally posted by wonderworld
It seems like a pilot would understand the basics of atmospheric neutrinos. Maybe you guys have another name for it.
Originally posted by wonderworld
It can be important to Parallel planes. Aerospace issues apply here.
Originally posted by wonderworld
Another thing to check would be neutrino cloud seeding, neutrino atmospheric effects and planes, it's only one variable in the mix. After all this is still a conspiracy theory right?
Originally posted by wonderworld
Like I said before if I could prove it I would either end up dead or win the UNESCO Science Prize Award.
Originally posted by wonderworld
Chemtrails have been blamed for many things. In Canada they turned on noxious gases that killed trees and destroyed the fertility of the land, causing radar jam(chaff), blamed for the disappearing bee population, chemtrails and swine flu, respiratory related illnesses, medical research, killing rodents, depopulation, manipulating global warming and climates, etc, etc,
Originally posted by wonderworld
Some weather reporters on mainstream TV are not only acknowledging chemtrails, but also admitting they're made exclusively by the Military.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
That phrase is utterly nonsense to me --- wasn't covered in meteorology courses!
I will try to look at your links, to see if I understand where you're coming from.
As to trace minerals; the two used in these supposed chemtrails are common in any neighborhood in the US: Aluminum dust (from the corrosion of siding), and barium (used in rat poison, brick making, glass making, etc).
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Also used for Tesla saucer craft I suppose.
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Those people can make up anything but I'd like the link to the source
of how the saucer is connected.
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Are there reports of people breathing this dust in airliners going through
chemtrails.
President Obama is full of surprises. But even expectant reporters were taken aback when White House science adviser John Holdren used his first interview on April 18, 2009 to announce, “Global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth's air.”
With the first feedback effects from methane releases starting to kick in and our space colony's atmospheric CO2 levels surging toward the “Do Not Exceed” redline of 440 parts per million, Holdren declared that the Obama administration is considering “last resort” technologies to chill the global greenhouse village - aka the 'hood.
Referring to “radical” technologies that include spreading a sunlight-reflecting artificial cloud cover, Holdren declared, “It's got to be looked at. We don't have the luxury of taking any approach off the table.”
Since only a fraction of incoming solar radiation reaches the Earth's surface, this chemical sunscreen “would have more impact if done high in the atmosphere,” the NAS said. It might even “destroy stratospheric ozone.”
Ken Caldeira was the climate expert who ran the computer simulations at the Lawrence Livermore atom bomb labs. He too warned that the stratospheric spraying of sunlight-reflecting chemicals could “destroy the ozone layer” - as well as posing human health risks.
Nevertheless, the NAS enthused, “Perhaps one of the surprises of this analysis is the relatively low costs at which some of the geoengineering options might be implemented.”
Each “dust distribution mission” would require a 500-mile flight lasting about an hour and a half at a delivery cost of just $500 per ton of sunlight-reflecting chemicals
In 1996, the United States Air Force released its own feasibility study. Produced by seven high-ranking officers, “Owning The Weather In 2025” described this “high-risk, high-reward endeavor” in terms of “splitting of the atom” - before going on to describe how “Weather Force Specialists” could lay down “aerial obscuration” materials behind tanker aircraft.
“Global warming is too serious to be left to the politicians,” Teller later told the Wall Street Journal. “Injecting sunlight-scattering particles into the stratosphere appears to be a promising approach. Why not do that?” [Wall Street Journal Oct 17/97; Hoover Digest 1998 No. 1]
First confirmed by Airport Authority Terry Stewart at the Victoria International Airport on Dec. 8, 2000 as a “joint Canada-U.S. military operation” - and stridently denied by senior officers at Canadian Forces Base, where Stewart later told the Vancouver Courier he had received his information) - these tanker plane missions were verified in March, 2001 by the Air Traffic Control manager for the northeastern seaboard of the United States.
In three taped interviews with veteran radio journalist S.T. Brendt, our “Deep Sky” source said he had been ordered to divert incoming commercial flights away from USAF tankers spraying a reflective substance showing up on ATC radars as a 'haze'.
This FAA disclosure came on March 12, 2001 as squadrons of radar-identified air force tankers saturated skies over the northeastern United States with characteristic Xs, grids and parallel rows of broad, expanding chemical plumes.
After counting more than 30 big jets spreading persistent plumes within 45 minutes over remote rural Maine, ST Brendt called her assistant WMWV news director. Richard Dean and his staff went outside and counted 370 chemical trails over the next six-and-a-half hours. During this time, local Air Traffic Controllers reported only nine commercial jets on their radars
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS CONCERNED OVER CHEMTRAILS
One month after the 9/11 attacks, Deep Sky began phoning Air Traffic Controllers. At Chicago's O'Hare airport, all three major airports in New York, as well as Los Angeles LAX, San Francisco, Atlanta, Cleveland, San Diego, Washington DC's Dulles and Jacksonville, Florida controllers were being ordered to route airliners beneath formations of air force tanker planes spraying chemicals that clouded their screens.
Several smaller but busy airports at Westchester County in New York state and Manchester in New Hampshire confirmed similar experiences. Every controller, without exception, was being told to divert commercial traffic away from these military aircraft, and bring them in lower to avoid “experiments” that could degrade their radars.
Cleveland airport controllers were surprised by the extent of obscuration on their radars
CHEMTRAIL SCIENTISTS SPEAK OUT
Ohio is the home of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base tasked with developing Tesla, HAARP and related weather modification technology. In December 2001, a Lawrence Livermore scientist on loan to Wright-Pat told Columbus Alive reporter Bob Fitrakis that two different projects were being conducted. One involved spraying microscopic aluminum particles parallel lines, X-patterns and grids to create artificial cloud cover and lessen global warming. Barium chemtrails were being used to direct the military's beam weapon in Alaska called HAARP for 3-D imaging, electronic warfare - and steering the jet stream.
HR2977
Just two months before, Ohio Representative Dennis Kucinich had ignited a Congressional firestorm by introducing HR2977. His “Space Preservation Act” called for the peaceful uses of space and a ban on “exotic weapons”. Section 7 specifically sought to prohibit “chemtrails”.
Kucinich later told Columbus Alive that despite official denials, as head of the Armed Services oversight committee he was well acquainted with chemtrail projects. “The truth is there's an entire program in the Department of Defense - 'Vision for 2020' - that's developing these weapons,” Kucinich told Fitrakis. The U.S. Space Command mission statement calls for “full-spectrum dominance of space, land, sea and air.”
Both USAF tankers had flown south out of Alaska. As Dickie, the kids and the controllers watched, the big jets began making patterns over Edmonton - “circuits” the controllers called it. “Petro 011” and “Petro 012” were working alone in “commanded airspace” from which all other aircraft were excluded.
And they were leaving chemtrails.
“The signature is significant,” one radar operator commented, referring to a trail clearly visible on the scope extending for miles behind the KC-135. In contrast, a JAL flight on the display left no contrail.
www.willthomasonline.net...
Here’s another photo you see in “chemtrail” videos, with the implied suggestion that it’s some kind of evil spraying device:
Actually it IS a spraying device, but quite innocuous. It’s on an NKC-135A (55-3128) with the refueling boom modified to spray water. This used by the air force to test icing of planes in flight.
Here’s the original photo:
Originally posted by wonderworld
reply to post by weedwhacker
Another thing to check would be neutrino cloud seeding, neutrino atmospheric effects and planes, it's only one variable in the mix. After all this is still a conspiracy theory right?
I really have no idea what you're talking about but contrails such as we see today have been around for 80 years, have been studied extensively for at least the last 40 years and I've never seen any mention of neutrinos in any papers on the subject.
Maybe you could refer me to a few?
I do assume you've read up on the subject?
The technology involves manipulation of the ionosphere. The advanced techniques involve application of artificial electromagnetic field intensities. For example a cyclone can be created by these methods but the challenge lies in guiding the cyclone or typhoon to the adversary’s infrastructure in the warfare. For that, scientists are using defection shields by which solar flares can be deflected at the eye of the cyclone and drag it in the desired path.
Artificial manipulation of ionosphere can create massive cyclones and typhoons. But the mare use of ionosphere can only create the seed. The application of electromagnetic flux and creating a temperature differential is what makes a cyclone menacing.
Scientists have struggled to understand the best process of guiding the storm or manipulated weather. Many methods have been used. One of the recent methods used is bombarding neutrinos at the center of the eye of the cyclone or typhoon. Electromagnetic guiding of the cyclone is gaining ground.
The counter measures adopted by the countries against covert weather manipulation warfare are also remarkable but are still in its infancy. One counter measure as opted by some countries is the application of artificial electromagnetic flux from the outer space to neutralize the deflected solar flares in the eye of the storm.
Eventually it will be weather manipulation warfare from the outer space.
Artificial manipulation of ionosphere can create massive cyclones and typhoons. But the mare use of ionosphere can only create the seed. The application of electromagnetic flux and creating a temperature differential is what makes a cyclone menacing.