It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mindmelding
reply to post by neformore
Oh sure, you bring up facts, but it's the correlation to the actual topic that is invalid.
I'll give an example, the constant push of contrail science when people talk about chemtrails. It's irrelevant. We all know there is a science behind contrails. We all know the finer aspects of condensation. We've all gone through it.
None of the above invalidates chemtrails. Two different if visually similar phenomenons. Because people don't accept the fact that we could have this fac simile if chemtrails are real regardless of the validity of contrail science, the debunking is invalid.
It's not your science that is bad, I'm moderately impressed sometimes, it's the correlation that is unsustainable because we end up always talking about two different things.
Besides, you guys always gloss over the official news reports, the weathermen reports, the documents about the science and you always seem to want to classify weather modification as "something else", which it is not, it is chemtrails. We don't need any weather modification.
In short, you and a few other skebunkers (hehe) try to pass the idea that the chemtrails are another phenomenon, contrails. This is the gist of your argument, you don't add much else, except trying to classify weather modification as something else. It dosen't correlate to what most people are experiencing and I have the feeling most of you do it as a thought experiment.
If that last sentence is true you need to get out more.
Wow, I beg to differ with you on Grid patterns a Contrail will dissapear in 5 minutes. They dont stick around for the next few planes to fly by.