It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The Chiles-Whitted UFO Incident: Eastern Airlines Flight 576 and The “Rocket Ship”

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on May, 31 2009 @ 10:54 PM
EDITED completely after personal u2u....

[edit on 5/31/2009 by jkrog08]

posted on May, 31 2009 @ 11:59 PM
reply to post by jkrog08
Great work again. I'm beginning to think your threads should begin with the lights dimming and red velvet curtains opening...ta dah!! Epic and full of detail.

This incident is one that, to me, represents the difficulty of trying to understand the UFO phenomena. The early 20th Century featured a few sightings of the silver fuselage style of UFO. Mid-20th and onwards we see discs and from the late 1970s we have the boomerangs/ triangles.

The silver fuselage type (with bright port holes) reflected the tech of the time and sci-fi imagery. Nevertheless, it seems certain that the incident occurred and the UFO fitted the description. It's difficult to be clear makes me wonder if some UFOs are reflective of our technology? The parallels are there, but who can say if they mean anything? Think of the vast black triangles (600m wing span according to witnesses) and then think of our smaller black stealth planes. Silver 1940s airplanes and silver wingless fuselages...

The whole subject is full of mischief and paradox. Bloody infuriating

posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 01:06 AM
reply to post by Kandinsky

Thanks, I too have pondered that question about why the change in shape and design. I think a lot of UFO sightings today are really secret government craft. But then again we still have the saucer and cigar shaped craft reports also. I don't know, now that you brought it up I am going to have to research it and see the statistics on type of UFO seen over the years. Maybe there is more types of ETs visiting us now then before? I think really it is likely a mix of reverse engineered human craft (majority of triangle sightings) and ET craft (all others). I'll have to get back to you on this one,lol. Thanks for bringing it up though!

posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 06:02 AM
The ship seen seems to fit the design parameters of a type that uses a flame jet generator at the rear to ionize the airstream aft of the ship. This in turn created a net positive charge towards the front of the ship. The blue glow under the craft seems to support this, but I dunno why it would only be seen under the ship; not forward or aft

Maybe the field was biased towards the bottom (to provide lift?)

posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 06:34 AM

Originally posted by jkrog08
reply to post by MatrixProphet

Thanks for your reply and words. I wanted to conclude the series of threads I have done on the main cases that broke the UFO phenomina wide open in the late 40's. It is a lot of research but I hope it is well worth it for everyone who doesn't know about these cases.

S&F your thread, very extensive collection of information.

On to the excellent post, have you ever wondered why so many sigthnings right after world war 2 and why mostly in the US and latin america ? My hunch is that these are truly real alien craft and they are following their first contactees (german scientists, nazis and esoteric knowledgeable) as they fled Germany at the end of the war. The US officially had operation paperclip going and some of the worse nazi criminals most probably left for latin america, allegedly bringing high tech stuff with them (superior submarines loaded with cargo went missing). Its just a thought but the sightings might indicate that some of the material ended up in the hands of the US military complex which helped them build very sophisticated prototypes on secret installations and bases throughout the country. The latin america trail is probably war criminals that brought classified projects and documentation with them so they had some leverage if they ever needed to bargain with foreign nations i.e for their own security.

P.S. May i ask if you use some sort of knowledge management software, ive been searching the web for some time now but havent found exactly what i am looking for, it should be a mix of a mindmap, wiki and maybe also be able to search deep link material (you collect urls and the KMS gather information from the supplied links using keywords).


[edit on 2009/6/1 by reugen]

posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 09:45 AM
Excellent research...put forth extremely well. This is now another one of my "favorites".

posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 11:13 AM

You have done a great job. I also agree that our newer military crafts could be mistaken for ufo's but even with knowing this I don't believe our crafts can accomplish the movements of which ufo's can do.

posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 09:57 PM
Good story here.

If our discussions of that warp engine are still fresh in your mind, I believe that's where you'll find your answer. This indeed is quite an ideal item for something like that engine system. The colors the ship were emitting are my personal interest. Allow me to explain:

Red has a longer frequency. If the ship was under the influence of a constructive gravity wave, then the back of the ship would have light going at slower frequencies once they left the influence. And so the crew would see red at the back. If the ship was going downward, the bottom would be blueish, then grow more red when going higher.

This would also explain the general blue glowing of the ship itself, as it's a Doppler affect of the gravity wave. Light is coming out of the field more than going in (from windows or the fuel, whatever) Light is bouncing everywhere, but filling up more in the field then not. And if the front was black, it would simply be an affect of gravity being more destructive ahead, creating an odd affect. of being dragged ahead but that. Maybe, I don't know. Could just be light not existing there yet.

It also explains the intelligent and radical moves. it's simply at a higher speed of relativity of time.

Ah ha! I love knowledge of physics!

I'll try to digest this some more later.

posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 09:58 PM
Thank you everyone for your replies, I am kind of busy at the moment but I will add some more a little later.

posted on Jun, 4 2009 @ 01:50 PM
reply to post by jkrog08

Fantastic information and Thanks for posting this. I admit...I have been quite a bit of a UFO skeptic even after being on ATS (only for 3 months now but it has been great) ...but threads like this have me so interested now I am hooked!

jkrog08, great OP and thread! Starred & Flagged...and to think that I got the hook with a simple jellyfish!


[edit on 4-6-2009 by burntheships]

posted on Jun, 4 2009 @ 01:56 PM
reply to post by burntheships

Cool, I am glad I can help you and others in understanding the very real UFO phenomina. This is one of the better cases IMO.

posted on Jun, 4 2009 @ 02:23 PM
Great research! Awesome compilation from various sources!

posted on Jun, 21 2009 @ 04:11 AM
I have to say, this is a damn good write up on the Chiles / Whitted incident. So much so that I took a goodly chunk of it and imported it in to my wiki. The only modifications I made were to make it a bit more neutral and to remove any extraneous POV in the spirit of making it encyclopedia friendly.

Good work JK

posted on Nov, 29 2016 @ 04:35 PM
Old thread obviously but just a few corrections. One, Robins AFB is spelled with one "r" obviously now and two, the base is located in the city of Warner Robins, GA, where I live, not Macon which is a neighboring city. Thanks

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in