It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did NASA Destroy The Face On Mars??

page: 7
37
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2009 @ 02:39 PM
link   
reply to post by c3hamby
 

Thanks c3hamby! I'm on it. I'm trying to procure them from Amazon.com as Telos has suggested.


Cheers!




posted on May, 31 2009 @ 04:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Taymour
POINT OF VIEW:



Taymour


Looks like Taymour is saying "Look at the face upside down and it looks like an ET face."

The erosive damage on the right side of "our point of view" of the face is the same as the erosive damage on the left side of Taymour's. 180 degree flip, and the face turns into an ET face.

Pretty slick!



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 07:21 PM
link   
Just a little bit more that could shed some light on the story...


Remember the ship we lost about 2 years ago, as it arrived in Mars orbit it just disappeared?...it was a nuke. It exploded 1500 feet above surface...it was supposed to remove the face and pyramids.

If someone can do a spectral analysis of chemical compounds off the film shown on the web, they'll find a high concentration of Cesium 157. Radiation can be picked up on film and that kind of analysis discloses chemical compounds. Cesium 157 is a man made industrial isotope, not found in nature. Therefore, if it's present on Mars, it was put there by man, or some other advanced civilization."

The first film...the '76 film of Cydonia was a trick of light. The Face was there...but you should have seen the film they didn't show the public!

The release of the first film was a mistake. It shouldn't have been released to the public. The story is that one of the insiders maybe [name withheld], was trying to get the story out. Anyway, [name withheld] was terminated 2 days after the release of that film. It came out on a Friday afternoon .. he was fired by Monday."


Can anyone here do this spectral analysis mentioned and see what we come up with?

....and some possible info regarding the face:


A man who worked for JPL related how he was fired on April 14. His only infraction was looking at some pictures! What happened was that he had pictures to be mailed by UPS or Fed Express, when he went to the cupboard where the containers were kept for mailing it was empty. He called the office and asked for some to be delivered. While he was waiting he went into the coffee room to have a cup of cocoa. The maintenance technician came in to have a cup of coffee. He came over to sit down with Kent! In the process he knocked the pictures off the table where Kent had placed them until the container arrived. Each picture was placed between protective cardboard and inside plastic envelopes. Well when they got knocked off the table (inadvertently) they fell on the floor and fell out of the container. Both Kent and the Maintenance Tech looked at them as he picked them up to place them back in the envelope. There in reddish copper colored photography was the most beautiful "mask" as he called it taken (the date was imprinted on it) on April 2, 1998. It was taken from a point directly over it and the full face and sun shining right on it - no shadows. Another picture had the same hue but this picture (there were 9 in all) was of a building with structured walls. He said the roof was missing and one wall had been caved in like it had been blasted. He said there was no doubt it was a building.

About the time he was putting the pictures back between the cardboard a higher man in a suit walked in the door. What should have taken 5 or 6 steps to get to him took the man 3. He leaped across the room and asked Kent what he was doing. He explained he was waiting for containers to ship the pictures in and they had fallen on the floor. The man grabbed the pictures and left.

In an hour or so he was called upstairs to the big bosses office where he was fired for dereliction of duty. He said what were you doing "looking at the pictures of Mars?" He said these pictures are not for the American public to see. He explained again. This was the first time he really knew for sure they were pictures from Mars. He had not used the word before.

Art asked him if he had mailed other pictures before and where they were mailed to. He said he mailed pictures to Langley AFB, Virginia (home of the CIA), and to the White House.

Art asked him if he had ever seen any other pictures and he said one time he was in the coffee room getting coffee when he looked over the shoulder of 2 suited men looking at pictures of what looked like the pyramids in Egypt but again in the reddish hue. When they saw him there they put them away real fast.

Kent would not give his last name because when he returned home that day early in the afternoon he walked into his apartment and noticed something was different. He was a confirmed bachelor and never dusted therefore he noticed right away that there was a ring where his telephone had been moved! He picked up the receiver and unscrewed the mouthpiece and there was a black computer chip someone had put in there. He carefully put it back on. He noticed other things out of place too. Now he knew that he was a hunted man. He quickly got a few things, locked the door and boarded an airplane out of there. Art asked him if he would be safe. He said he was going where he grew up and that yes he would be safe there. I wouldn't even had said that! Easy to find that out.

Art asked him to see if he could get hold of the Maintenance Man and have him call Art and verify what they saw. He said he would and he thanked Art for telling his story and also Linda Howe as she had talked to him first.

There you have it - a complete cover up - which we all knew anyway but isn't it just too bad that an innocent person has to suffer because of the blasted cover-ups this government perpetrates on us!

www.cyberspaceorbit.com...



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 07:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by spaznational
The human mind is designed to recognize certain patterns that indicate a face. Our mind makes an error sometimes and will see a face in a non-face pattern. None of these Mars photos are even very face-like. In the one with a "crown" you can see the lay of the sediment layers in the ground coursing through the face area, and the different colored stripes. It's a wild extrapolation to claim this is the work of some beautiful race of Alien-Angels or whatever.

This looks more like a face than any of these Mars photos...




VS.



[edit on 30-5-2009 by spaznational]


Not to beat a dead horse but is this mars face not very face like? Just saying, sometimes it aint all parodelia. I know I'm wasn't imagining things I when came across this.




www.msss.com...



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 08:49 PM
link   
I cannot see any significant change between the '76 images and the newer ones. The cave-in is there in the original photograph but is only visible/implied along the shadows' border. It's most easily seen around the mouth area.

There are times when a detailed image of someone/something can give less information for the human eye (explained terribly,sorry). Take this example. Whenever I see a face pixelated for anonymity on the news, or a pixelated photo of a famous person on a quiz show, I always find I can see the image much clearer and therefore more likely to guess who it is on a quiz if I squint or pull back further from the TV. This is why I believe the older lower res photo in 76 produces a better image.

I also don't believe NASA or the secret space program would undertake to destroy it. By the time we can prove that the face is real we'll be unable to hold NASA, the US government, ESA and all the other interested parties to account. Big Brother will already be upon us and 'Contact' may have already been disclosed. As for other space programs such as Japan's 'outing' the evidence, I highly doubt it. Once they get let into the secret and are allowed to join the party they will not hesitate to agree to the condition of secrey and non-disclosure.

Personally I believe the Face is real (some research has reported, teeth and eyebrows or eye lashes) and that it has just eroded over the centuries. I also believe it to be hollow at least in part, and that that is the reason for the collapse of one side. I had to chuckle when watching the movie 'mission to mars' and wondered if someone involved had inside knowledge. And before you say anything, no I don't believe it's a spacecraft. It's a temple, or monument or even a sign of a dying race saying 'kilroy was here'. I suspect there's a library of sorts within it. Even a time capsule for us to open when we return to Mars hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of years after fleeing it.



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 08:57 PM
link   
reply to post by spikedmilk
 


JPL "KENT" EXPOSED!!!!!!


The following Reverse Speech analysis of the famous Kent broadcast on the Art Bell show where he claimed to have seen colour photos of the Face on Mars and the ruins of a city, has been exposed by David Oates and Richard Hoagland, as a scam. When confronted by Richard Hoagland on April the 22nd with information found in reverse, Kent whose real name is supposedly Greg Beal, broke down and confessed, claiming that he was working for a disinformation unit in the defence intelligence agency. He was staggered that they had been exposed by Reverse Speech so quickly.



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 09:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Ferris.Bueller.II
 


hey isnt that Gazroks pic?


anyways, didnt know about that. thanks for bringing it forth.
Clears that up I guess. too bad though.....



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 09:37 PM
link   
reply to post by spikedmilk
 


Here's Gazrok's profile with his avatar. His and mine are of Tim the Enchanter from The Holy Grail.

I remember this when it happened. A classic example of a government disinfo agent.

[edit on 5/31/09 by Ferris.Bueller.II]



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 10:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Pauligirl
 
Hiya PG, good questions as usual. Why would 'visitors' use faces in rock to find their underground bases? Wouldn't they use our technology or even better? What's the matter with GPS, celestial navigation, maps?! No wonder they're always crashing! It's quite a miracle they made it to Earth!

Likewise on Mars, who would build a face and why? It's over a mile long! Who'd go all the way there and blow it up?

There's a good mpeg rotation of the Face here. The elliptical shadow images from Mars are nothing unusual and predicted by ESA. All these things blew me away a few years ago. Now, the more we look into things, the less we see of the weird or unusual



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 10:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


I dunno, I think there is too many 'anomalies' on Mars to rule anything out IMO. You have multiple artificial looking structures, 'forest', 'lakes', and many others, Am I saying I know for sure they are ET? No, but it is sure worth a look.


[edit on 6/1/2009 by jkrog08]



posted on May, 31 2009 @ 11:29 PM
link   
reply to post by jkrog08
 
Hiya Jkrog


No. I wouldn't rule anything out either. I'm a guy that once spent a couple of days looking at Living Moon with my jaw on the floor! Truth is it'd be the most exciting discovery in years if we discovered the remnants of an ancient culture on Mars. Until then, every piece of evidence that's brought to ATS gets the treatment! As far as I can recall (I'm dog-tired...no sleep) there aren't any good images from the Moon or Mars that haven't been reasonably explained in other threads. To accept the possibility that something is up there is to also accept the possibility that there isn't. In the meantime, we have to look at everything using brains as well as feelings.

There are two or three members worth watching closely...if a 'smoking gun' is ever going to be found...it'll be from one of them.



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 12:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kandinsky
Likewise on Mars, who would build a face and why? It's over a mile long! Who'd go all the way there and blow it up?

And why build those massive pyramids in Egypt and other places? How about the theory that the so called face is a burrial place like the pyramids? Probably there's a sarcophagus in a hollowed out area underneath? And the face is that of an Emperor for whom this structure was made?

OK, this is all hypothetical. But we don't know either way.... as of now! Until we get our boots out there!

Cheers!



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 12:47 AM
link   
Great post, however you can not really judge by comparison because the first image shot was covered in shadows and hard to point out details.



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 01:28 AM
link   
I would just like to throw this up in the air but Mr. Lear has said numerous times that we have between 8 and 12 orbiting weapons platforms and by his account is the cause of the 911 tragedy....if our own gov't would use that here on earth then i wouldnt put it past them to use it on the face on mars...besides its all about controlling we the ppl...btw the great post



gnarkill1529



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 07:42 AM
link   
I doubt NASA would want to destroy something of somewhat great historical significance, especially when they have other more sophisticated means of hiding this information. Besides we have no idea how corrosive the Martian landscape is, in 30 - 40 yrs if that side is facing windward this could be natural corrosion.

One funny thing would be if there is a race of sentient beings who live underground due to harsh terranean conditions and we a try and destroy a sacred sculpture to them, this would be very embarrasing.



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 10:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by mystiq
 


impossible you say picture link it happens on earth , why not on mars too



I've already addressed this one. Its absolutely amazing to me as an artist that anyone could assume that that massive sculpture in Alberta was caused by receding ice. When they cover truth, so often they use such lame methods. Question everything. That particular carving is articficially made, and is a marker, so that any et scanning the planet would have seen from a distance, and then scanned for energy imprints below. In any case, I'm wondering how old that one is and suspect it, at least, is being utilized by our miltia based on something I'd read about it in the past.

These things arent accidents at all.

[edit on 1-6-2009 by mystiq]



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 10:37 AM
link   
reply to post by mystiq
 


Where was that picture taken again?



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 01:21 PM
link   
Hi mike


On the site thehiddenrecords.com you will find a rather good explanation of what the face resembles and why its there.
Besides that, there is an in depth investigation of the face itself. Its has everything to do with a star map which will be found on certain places on earth also.
The writer comes up with a very interesting composite image of the face. I cant link to it btw. He even claims to have evidence the face is made of stones like the the pyramids in Egypt. Images included.

Well, GO HERE
Then go to SUN-LIKE STAR (upper menu)
Then go to MARS (to the right)

cheers



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 10:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by mystiq

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by mystiq
 


impossible you say picture link it happens on earth , why not on mars too



I've already addressed this one. Its absolutely amazing to me as an artist that anyone could assume that that massive sculpture in Alberta was caused by receding ice. When they cover truth, so often they use such lame methods. Question everything. That particular carving is articficially made, and is a marker, so that any et scanning the planet would have seen from a distance, and then scanned for energy imprints below. In any case, I'm wondering how old that one is and suspect it, at least, is being utilized by our miltia based on something I'd read about it in the past.

These things arent accidents at all.

[edit on 1-6-2009 by mystiq]


Look at it in context.
wikimapia.org...

The profile was formed by the erosion of rainwater on layers of clay-rich soil, not receding ice.
It's not a sculpture, it’s an inverse relief, formed by valleys rather than by raised ground
www.absoluteastronomy.com...

www.been-seen.com...
Take a look at it from ground level.
It was formed by the same natural process that formed the rest of the badlands. Wind and water.



posted on Jun, 1 2009 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Lunica
 

Hi Lunica! Get a load of this....Another 'Mars face' I found on Earth off the Cuban coast on Google Earth. I have included the Mars ‘face' for comparison.

In the middle of this image...


The ‘face’ South of the Cuban coast

Enlarged….



The ‘face’ On Mars and Off Cuba: A Comparison


The ‘face’ on Mars (Left), taken by Viking, and the one off the Cuban coast, colorized and noise compensated.

This is either a natural geological formation or a long gone civilization that sculpted both the ‘face’ on Mars as well as the one here eons ago. Atlantis? Lemuria?

Whatever it is, it’s fascinating all the same! Is there a connection? Your guess is as good as mine!

Cheers!




top topics



 
37
<< 4  5  6    8 >>

log in

join