Loch Ness Sighting, page 3

reply to post by scoopyjon

---

Why do you think that!!!!


Edit: I forgot to say to Heisenberg - bye bye from ATS

[edit on 30/5/09 by freemindmine]

I believe that the photo is real. As I said, it was grainy and taken while walking his dog. You take a picture while doing something and get it to be clear and void of any problems. Anyway, the dispellers will dispell even the best of evidence. You have not been had; in fact, your lack of belief leads you to "have" doubt even if the occurance happened to you! I have known Eustace for over 30 years and he is a trustworthy guy.

reply to post by scoopyjon

---

It was out of sheer excitement! If you get information from a trustworthy individual would you not tell anyone until they provided you with a portfolio of evidence? If that were the case, 99% of ATS would not exist! Why do they release proclaimations all of the time while things are still in trial form?????????????????

reply to post by Wally Conley

---

I am still having a little problem with some posts calling the photo fake. Why? Please be more elaborate then just calling it such.

reply to post by PrisonerOfSociety

---

Well then...perhaps in the future I can be more of a skeptic.

reply to post by Silk

---

reply to post by Heisenberg

---

If you'd like to provide some more evidence, the original digital file extracted from the phone without any alterations and the mobile phone brand and model would help us check if it is indeed possible that it's a picture from a mobile phone. The picture you uploaded has a strange dimension of 259 by 216 pixels, which doesn't seem to be a normal format for mobile phone images - however, if his mobile phone brand & model match, it would lend some credibility to the image itself. For what it's worth, I don't mind you posting from enthousiasm - in fact, I think I might've done the same - and hope you don't blame ATS for the negativity some residents exhibit ;].

reply to post by Heisenberg

---

I'm unsure whether you're yanking our chains, as you seem to believe the photo is real

I tried to break apart the image in photoshop, but the quality is so bad, it's not worthy of analysis.

Points to consider:

i). there is no dimension to the nessie, i.e. there's no depth to her body to suggest she's in the water
ii). there's no wake in the water, nor ripples
iii). the shadow is highly suspicious; it seems to be masked and then smudged to make it appear to blend with the water.
iv). the reflection is trapezoidal, especially at the tail, whereas the head reflection falls inside to the left
iv). the shoreline is too straight, suggesting a splice of two images.
v). finally, it's a crayon drawing done by your niece or nephew

Any further text is wasting my screen ink, i'm afraid.

Strange creatures from Marianas Trench
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags

\'Woolly mammoth\' caught on camera in Siberia
  Posted 2 days ago with 18 member flags

icelandic lake monster spotted! (VIDEO)
  Posted 4 days ago with 16 member flags

The Bridgewater Triangle
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags

Scientists to Add Spider Genes to Human Genome to Create ‘Bulletproof Skin’
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags

Bigfoot Attack...or is the Lizard Man in Georgia?
  Posted 9 days ago with 5 member flags

\'mutant spider fears at nuclear wastelab\'
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags

Shape-Shifting Dinosaurs by Jack Horner (TED Talk)
  Posted 0 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: