Are 9/11 Official Story Proponents Really the Unpatriotic?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 37 times


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 12:04 AM by impressme
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999


Comparing apples to oranges....yet again.......

Buildings subjected to heavy damage and uncontrolled fires are far different from a boxcutter.


You’re funny!


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 12:09 AM by impressme
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999



debunk911myths.org...

This is a disinformation site that you have posted no wonder you believe in such nonsense



reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 12:33 AM by impressme
reply to post by GreenBicMan



His whole post was nothing but hearsay nothing more, he said this, that one said that, and so on… The OS is base on hearsay … Oh the bulge where is the proof it was not in the 911 commission report I wonder why …Oh nothing about WTC 7 was in the OS. only the proven lies that NIST conjured up.


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 12:35 AM by GreenBicMan
reply to post by impressme



Thats what I was thinking as well.. although I hate to say stuff that I cant back up

I just think common sense should tell you that something was up that day...

Not a lot of people talk about it, but I think some of the most damning evidence is the false confession of the ABC producers wife saying she saw it all go down from her penthouse, when that was impossible (saw this on some online video)


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 06:02 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by impressme



Funny thing about things often labeled "disinformation". "Disinformation" appears to be synomous with "proves me wrong" in CT circles. It is after all so easy to declare any contrary information "disinformation", the devil is in the details though and that claim is seldom proven as little more than a spurious label slapped on for the convience of the person believing what they want.


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 06:05 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by TrueAmerican



Ah, so acting just as atrocious *or more so* as you percieve those that you stand in opposition to, to act, is perfectly fine huh? Very telling that.

[edit on 31-5-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 08:24 AM by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Then you post a picture taken during the clean up and call it planting evidence...again classic....

When have you ever seen at any crash in history, men in expensive suits running around handling aircraft debris? He's either in a hurry to plant it or he's in a hurry to pick it up so it can't be identified.


Originally posted by GreenBicMan
if you could reference a picture of WTC 7 and all the structural damage

Swampy won't, so I will:

Here's a screenshot from
this video showing the damage on the south side of WTC7:




And here's the roof:




You'll note that almost all of the damage is cosmetic and that the "gash" is only superficial. There was another building that got damaged almost identically to WTC7. Bankers Trust building:



Yep, still standing after 9/11.


Oh, and WTC7 was deliberately sabotaged. Fires were already started and burning before either tower collapsed. Here's a north side and south side view of the fires in WTC7 before either tower collapsed:






So, since WTC7 had fires deliberately set, then you can also conclude they would deliberately bring the building down as the video evidence suggests.

And if anyone thinks that one of these buildings below fell due to fires and minor, mostly cosmetic damage, then they need to take some physics courses:



Buildings do not fall down like that unless every single support column was severed at exactly the same time. Fires don't do that and never will.


[edit on 31-5-2009 by _BoneZ_]


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 08:34 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by _BoneZ_


The following comment is fallacious and shows a lack of understanding of physics:
Buildings do not fall down like that unless every single support column was severed at exactly the same time. Fires don't do that and never will.

No building is as near invincible as that.

[edit on 31-5-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 08:51 AM by dodadoom
reply to post by _BoneZ_


Just wanted to reiterate(repeat) this in case we missed it;

Buildings do not fall down like that unless every single support column was severed at exactly the same time. Fires don't do that and never will.

if anyone thinks that one of these buildings below fell due to fires and minor, mostly cosmetic damage, then they need to take some physics courses:


What's physics?

[edit on 31-5-2009 by dodadoom]


reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 08:56 AM by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by _BoneZ_



Too bad you're dead wrong and your spew stinks more than a little....

Either way, buildings are big things made up of a bunch of smaller things fastened together, right? Right. That means at each point were a peice of material is fastened together is a point of possible fail. Now, different materials and different fastening techniques have differing abilities as to what it can hold up *weight*. Now, when a number of those points fail and the remaining points cannot structurally hold up all the weight the structure fails resulting in a collapse. You need not remove all the supports of a building or do it precisely to cause it to collapse I hate to tell you. Collapse IS something they shoot to avoid happening but we have not attained the ability to make next to invincible buildings.
The distinction and art of demotion is doing it in such a way that it does not happen chaoticly and damage or destroy it's surroundings while it's going down.

Otherwords, you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. So kindly don't attempt to insult me.

[edit on 31-5-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 8 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 19 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags