Hi, Dave. I remember my German class professor from college in the early 70's. Someone asked if he had been a German soldier in WW2. He said yes, and
he had been a pow but had been treated humanely and when the war was over, he just went back to being a German citizen. He had no hatred or animosity
toward Americans. The war was over and he had to get on with his life, which at some point led to moving to the United States to teach university
German.
In the 1980's I stayed at the home of an uncle of some Japanese-America friends. The uncle had been a soldier in the Japanese army in WW2. As an
American, I thought I would be in for a lecture on the atrocities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To my surprise, he simply stated that what was done was
done in time of war, and the war was over. Things are done in times of war that are not done in times of peace. There was no anger.
An American (as in many other cultures) soldier must be trained to be able to kill, something that is not natural. An enemy must not only be created
but turned into something, if not inhuman/de-person-alized (gook, raghead), than at least made to become something that will cause death to
loved ones/fellow citizens (the mushroom cloud of Saddam).
I think that Americans (soldier as well as civilian) would have been psychologically better off if they had been allowed to "get over" VietNam.
Instead, we were subjected to years of the POW/MIA campaign, encouraged by national leaders, as well as politicians and their supporters who felt a
need to do away with the "Viet Nam Syndrome" (which was supposedly put to rest in the Gulf War). While the Vietnamese, like the Germans and
Japanese, were willing to get on with their lives without anger or animosity, Americans were not allowed to do so. Hatred of the "enemy" was still
going strong years after the war ended.
The American soldier serves at the behest of an elected leader. If that leader deems another human being an "enemy", then it is so, and both soldier
and citizen are prepared by their leaders for a fight. I cannot imagine this any different in other nations. As much as Americans would like to have
other countries' citizens overturn their leaders' war stance, we have only to look at ourselves to see how well we have done so here. I think you
are correct in your assessment that the average NK citizen is not being belligerent, but their leaders are.

