Pentagon Plans New Arm to Wage Cyberspace Wars , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 29-5-2009 @ 12:31 PM by burntheships

Pentagon Plans New Arm to Wage Cyberspace Wars


www.nytimes.com
The Pentagon plans to create a new military command for cyberspace, administration officials said Thursday, stepping up preparations by the armed forces to conduct both offensive and defensive computer warfare.
The military command would complement a civilian effort announced on Friday by President Obama, who said the United States must have a comprehensive new way to safeguard its computers in the 21st century
Mr. Obama announced the creation of a White House office
reporting to both....
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 29-5-2009 @ 01:35 PM by burntheships
reply to post by SLAYER69



Very fitting image indeed! The USAF has extenisve force in this already. I think it is the perfect way for all of what they do to be classifed, so even the normal Freedom of Information Acts will not cover it. Sorry folks, it is classified.

In other words, we (Gov) know everyting you do, say, type, speak...and you get to know nothing about the how when why of it. Classifed!


reply posted on 30-5-2009 @ 07:30 PM by spinkyboo
Originally posted by burntheships
Cybersecurity: Obama’s Promise to Trash the Constitution

During a speech today on “cybersecurity,” Obama told a whopper. He said the government’s effort to protect us from cyber bad guys “will not include monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic. We will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that we cherish as Americans.”

Is it possible Obama has never heard of Mark Klein, the retired AT&T communications technician who said years ago that the company shunted all Internet traffic — including traffic from peering links connecting to other Internet backbone providers — to semantic traffic analyzers, installed in a secret room inside the AT&T central office on Folsom Street in San Francisco? There are similar rooms in Seattle, San Jose, Los Angeles and San Diego, all sucking up internet data.


This is exactly what worries me about this fellow. I don't know his inner most intentions - so I'm not going to pretend I do -
but he was indeed the one who ultimately let AT&T off the hook? NO?
And made it easier for this to continue to happen without repercussions... in the future?

I am reminded of this wonderful Whitehouse "Organic " garden and the fact that the rest of us are unknowingly chomping down on GMO foods that are proving to be a real health issue. Does he not KNOW about GMO's and Monsanto? Of course he does - (some of his cabinet members are directly involoved)
But - he isn't talking about that - he's talking about making sure other aspects of our food are looked after. He wants to clean up food safety - but never mentions Monsanto seed source? Hello?

So there isn't going to be any private sector privacy issues in regards to monitoring our internet - phones etc - but there IS at this very moment this going on?
We are not going to continue the war - but - oh yes we are -
and we will in fact begin a new one?

I want to like this guy. I want to like everyone. But this is terribly confusing.

[edit on 30-5-2009 by spinkyboo]



reply posted on 31-5-2009 @ 08:36 AM by burntheships
reply to post by spinkyboo



Very well said, astute observations! And you raise up some interesting contradictions happening right now! I like your example of the organic garden....especially!

What is going on...I think this is the classic politician doublespeak!
The term doublespeak was coined in the early 1950s. It is often incorrectly attributed to George Orwell and his 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The term does not appear in that novel, although Orwell did coin newspeak, oldspeak, and doublethink, and his novel made fashionable composite nouns with speak as the second element, which were previously unknown in English. Doublespeak may be considered, in Orwell's lexicography, as the vocabulary of Newspeak, words "deliberately constructed for political purposes: words, that is to say, which not only had in every case a political implication, but were intended to impose a desirable mental attitude upon the person using them." The term double talk (with a similar meaning) dates back to at least 1936.
Source

Hummm...going back to what President Obama said, "will not include monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic. We will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that we cherish as Americans"...he is telling us what we want to hear, to create warmth and trust with him...so we believe he will protect our rights and liberties as Americans. But...while he speaks, he is deliberately doing the opposite.

And it is the desired affect they wish to achieve ...leaving us confused instead of angry, feeling betrayed, learning not to trust the government.
THAT is what they want!




[edit on 31-5-2009 by burntheships]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 24 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 20 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 20 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 118 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 94 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 10 hours ago, 64 replies