One for the truthers

Pretty credible stuff. (Apologies if already posted)

This individual goes into depth why the towers were brought down by a controlled demolition.

Facts and figures and the laws of physics do not seem to apply when arguing this subject with those who refuse to believe that our government are liars. Let the ridiculous attempts to debunk this commence.

I can't believe they allowed this to air. They must have seriously underestimated this guy's capacity for conveyance.

And of course, every other station is avoiding this clip like the plague - like we're supposed to think it's just a little less true because it came from a [relatively] small locally owned station. Either that or the establishment knows it's plan has advanced so far as to afford itself immunity from the truth...and any effort to expose it from any of us.

The Internet has gotta be in big trouble, because I love it so much...nothing this good lasts for long.

EDIT: Oops...star and flag.

[edit on 28-5-2009 by lagnar]

Just a random thought that has no basis in fact that I had whilst listening to the speaker.
What if the destruction of the buildings were being thought of during their construction?
What if Thermite was place inside the buildings, when they were being built.
That would suggest, that his scenario was decades in the making.
I would not doubt it.
The entire paranormal-psychotic nature of 911 reeks of it.

Like I stated before, just a random thought that has no basis in fact.

Originally posted by reticledc
Just a random thought that has no basis in fact that I had whilst listening to the speaker.
What if the destruction of the buildings were being thought of during their construction?
What if Thermite was place inside the buildings, when they were being built.
That would suggest, that his scenario was decades in the making.
I would not doubt it.
The entire paranormal-psychotic nature of 911 reeks of it.

Like I stated before, just a random thought that has no basis in fact.

reticledc:

Interesting thoughts, but my understanding is the construction of these buildings significantly pre-dates the development of nano-thermites.

As he mentioned in the vid it would have had to be installed under the guise of elevator upgrades with the full knowledge of the co. responsibility for building security.

He only went into the why of how it fell down.
Gee how many could answer that question in a TV interview.
1 2 100 1000 in a row might say demolition.

Don't ask children or any even going off to college around 2001
cause they all saw the History Channel mind control and never
heard the towers had core beams.

The young ones tend to obey authority yet way in the past there
was a disruptive period among some for various reasons.

Going against the hijack story just didn't fit the bill.
Although Alex Jones had a Inside Job crew down at ground zero,
or freedom zero now, and bugged Gerardo during some bathing
suit conflict on the airlines.

The Moore movie might have set the seen of outward activity
but might have fell short of investigation material, I can't
recall.

I don't see the Illuminati in need of restructure but when it
comes a whole new importance comes of old facts.

Originally posted by reticledc
What if the destruction of the buildings were being thought of during their construction?
What if Thermite was place inside the buildings, when they were being built.
That would suggest, that his scenario was decades in the making.

The entire paranormal-psychotic nature of 911 reeks of it.

THe planting of explosives in the buildings while they were being built is the most likely scenario.

Get Smart! Epispde 52
www.abovetopsecret.com...


[edit on 31-5-2009 by In nothing we trust]