While the Electric Universe Theory may be true, lest we all forget that the modern model of the Universe has led us to the many advancements we have
today. Modern cosmology as explained A LOT of complicated things
that can be predicted and tested by these confirmed predictions, like pulsars for
example. Also I do not see why people claim the Big Bang Theory is on 'thin ice', it is actually as steady as ever and the recent WMAP images
show that. All that we have observed (for the most part) has been predicted
accurately by modern mainstream cosmology. Just because it is
complex or confusing to some people does not mean it is wrong. Granted right now there are
many conflicting and seemingly 'physics gibberish'
type theories out there but keep in mind this as well before you go bashing and challenging modern cosmology and calling it cult or religion like:
We are now at a point in cosmology and theoretical physics(keep in mind the THEORETICAL part, no one claims theoretical models are fact) where we have
never been before. In the last 110 years we have discovered the quantum world and its "zoo" of particles, we have discovered the Doppler effect, we
have discovered many, many strange things in space that is quite frankly pushing our small minds to the brink of what is possible to comprehend. We
have broken down particles to their fundamental string forms and one of the string theories is likely correct, this too can be proven with
mathematical proofs and observations in cosmosology and astronomy. It is a joint operation here, we are also now, as the great Dr. Michio Kaku says,
"past the Big Bang and into pre-Big Bang physics". Do you know we have broken down the entire Universes life into 7 epics, almost each one we can
confirm by current observational techniques. Do you know that now scientist are into ground breaking research in the hyperspatial dimension that
appears to exist outside of our space, let alone the multiple research efforts (that are making promise) on the subspatial realm, quantum vacuum, or
the spacetime foam (whatever you must call it). I can see where there are some issues that can be challenged by the Electric Universe supporters and
mainstream cosmology denouncers but I really do not see how many of what is challenged can be or has any bases.
There is no arguing with the many real world proven technologies predicted by quantum mechanics (which are a major factor in modern cosmology) nor
the many peer reviewed, multiple observed astronomical observations and predictions made on these so called "made up theories". Just because
something seems "impossible" to us from our limited real world views DOES NOT make it impossible in the rest of the Universe and its exotic and high
energy macro and micro physics relationship by any means. Just because we can not go and travel to stars or make stars in a lab (yet) does not mean we
can not prove theories by observations and predictions from ground and space based observational points. Those who said that modern cosmology and
theoretical physics "does not follow the scientific method" were also complaining about all the theories and no laws. Well there are so many
theories because mainstream astronomical science DOES follow the scientific method and because there is no way to get a absolute real world test (like
dropping an apple from a tree) modern astronomical science is proceeding
very cautiously and will not consider any of the already proven
theories laws until MANY MORE direct observations are made, which would prove beyond any likely probability that the prediction is right, even without
a direct real world test.
With current technology it is simply impossible to conduct any high enough scale tests to prove any of these theories the classical way, I mean think
about that for a second, think about trying to prove some of the quantum theories, relativity theories, string theories, pulsars, black holes, etc.
Cosmologists have NEVER said that they know what dark matter is and have always said it is more of a term for our ignorance gravity than anything
"real". Nor have they claimed that all of their theories are right, even though many look like they are. One must understand that right now we are
in so far over our heads with super, no hyper advanced physics observations of the entire Universe and beyond that it will be a mess somewhat for a
while, until we figure out what is going on. We are putting the pieces together slowly but surely, just like they did in the early and mid 20th
century with basic quantum mechanics and relativity among others. Also I think that the WMAP and Hubble findings pretty much clinch the Big Bang as
fact. To those who said it is "impossible" for stars in the center of a spiral galaxy to not fall into a black hole; You are wrong, even large black
holes do not exert long range effects strong enough at many lightyears out. Remember gravity is the weakest force, but it is the longest reaching
force (infinite reach that obviously weakens more with distance). It takes a lot more gravity than a super massive black hole has to pull massive
stars(which are what occupies the galactic centers) out of their gravitational 'trough' from many lightyears out. It has also never been stated
that a supermassive black hole MUST be present for spirals to form. I fact it is commonly believed that the form from previous galactic collisions, as
well local star density. So to the detractors of the current Universe model, it is all good and well to challenge theories but to say something has
pretty much not explained the Universe adequately is erroneous at best. There are MANY things we have yet to fully understand, that doesn't make
everything else false or give credence to another theory with basically no real world observations that have led to any solid proof however. Oh, and
CERN will be producing micro black holes in a few months so we should all see real soon just how much legitimacy modern models have.