It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by squiz
reply to post by Desolate Cancer
I read the exact same questions today on the Thunderbolts forum. Coincidence?
Anyway perhaps pop over and check some replies, MGmirkin gives an excellent reply, as usual. He's a member here as well BTW.
Not sure if the rules permit linking another forum.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
The sun is like any other large solid body object in space. Gravity forms it into a sphere.
That's why its round.
The electric sun theory describes the sun as a focal point for galactic energy. So what we are seeing is electric currents in space plasma pinching down on to the sun causing the discharge.
Here's a paper on the subject that was published in the IEEE Pulsed Power and Plasma Science Journal:
members.cox.net...
[edit on 13-6-2009 by mnemeth1]
Originally posted by Desolate Cancer
Originally posted by mnemeth1
The sun is like any other large solid body object in space. Gravity forms it into a sphere.
That's why its round.
The electric sun theory describes the sun as a focal point for galactic energy. So what we are seeing is electric currents in space plasma pinching down on to the sun causing the discharge.
Here's a paper on the subject that was published in the IEEE Pulsed Power and Plasma Science Journal:
members.cox.net...
[edit on 13-6-2009 by mnemeth1]
So the same 2 dimensional fabric of space theory of gravity is held with EU theory? I mean from the sound of it, the sun is a focul point for the electricity because it has a significant gravitational pull on the electricity.
Is this pull theorized to be caused by its mass and causing a "pinch" in the fabric of space? or is this gravitational pull theorized to be caused by a concentration of matter having an almost magnetic pull on the electricity emanating through out space?
Originally posted by Desolate Cancer
Found this image and article while using stumbleupon about a new picture of a sunspot thought it would be appreciated here.
Its great because they talk about how it is a plasma effect.
www.universetoday.com...
[edit on 20-6-2009 by Desolate Cancer]
Originally posted by Edrick
IMHO the only reason for the widespread propagation of "Junk Science" like Dark matter, or even "Particle Theory" is to keep the world in the dark on advanced scientific understanding and new technologies.
-Edrick
Originally posted by peskyhumans
I'm not a physicist, so don't stomp on me too hard if this sounds ridiculous, but I have always wondered if dark matter and errors in our understanding of galaxy formation are the result of a slight error in our understanding of gravity.
From what I understand the current model states that the gravity of an object is directly determined by its size and mass. What if gravity doesn't increase like on a straight line, where earth would have 1 earth mass would have 1 g of gravity, a 1000 earth mass would have 1000 g's, what if there was a curve and it had say, 1000.1 g's?
Black holes are supposed to have accretion disks, matter gets trapped in its gravity well and starts spiraling in, doomed to die. The formation of spiral galaxies requires a supermassive black hole be at the center, however for whatever reason, scientists state that the stars on the outer rim of these galaxies are unaffected by that black holes gravity, its impossible. Gravity isn't that strong. What if it was? What if right now, our own star and planet are on a billion-year death spiral into the black hole in the center of the Milky Way?
All the "dark matter" that is needed to hold our galaxy together is no longer needed. Every star is being directly influenced by the black hole. It seems simple enough to me, but I don't handle uber-complex physics formulaes all day.