This would be proof for me. I would join you conspiracy nuts in exposing the truth about 911. All I need to do is see the black box with the serial numbers filed off. Where is it? I suppose a petition with 100,000 signatures would force its display by those who have it.

If such a conspiracy existed, I am sure they could fabricate a fake black box with the right serial numbers. So forget my idea. Of all the deaths, there was only one child killed. A young man on his way to study oceanography. I forgot his name. I am sure his mother would have something to say to those who believe in the 911 conspiracy.

I find it so odd that only one child died with 4000 killed. Nobody else finds that odd?

Originally posted by trebor451
Tell us....do you agree with Cap't Bob and April Gallop that the Pentagon's self-defense missiles and defenses should have opened up to shoot down AA77?

trebor, read the title of the thread. Where does this thread's title mention self-defense missiles at the Pentagon?

Why are you so desperate to drag this thread off topic?

Originally posted by trebor451
Whatever credibility you claim just went down the toilet.

Ah-huh. I guess that dragging a thread off topic, like you did, does a lot for one's credibility, huh?

Swampfox was so correct........As you read through various accounts of the collection of aircraft parts, it becomes obvious that the FBI, charged with evidence collection an normally obsessive about preserving the chain of evidence, repeatedly violated their own procedures regarding chain of evidence.

While I have little respect for that particular agency, they are good at criminal investigation. So, why, in a case of this magnitude, did they collect evidence in a manner that practically guaranteed that said evidence would never withstand challenges in a court of law? I postulate that it was because they knew it would never reach the point of prosecution of anybody. If this is correct (which we'll probably never know), was it because

1> there were no hijackers
2> the perpetrators and planners were so high up they'd never be prosecuted
3> this was an op planned and run by the intel community

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
2) The original aircraft were outfitted with remote control capability-
And then hijacked by a remote control pilot mid air. One theory has the hijackers being hijacked themselves. They could have been enticed by the CIA to pose as hijackers, with the up front plan to free them after landing- when really they intended to do exactly what happened.

If identified by FDR serial number, the maintenance records would potentially show these modifications.

Nice thread

if I had to pick a scenario I would go with this one (the "hijackers" being hijacked themselves)

Ok, color me confused:

DL1989 ?

What connection to this am I missing?

Originally posted by earthman4
This would be proof for me. I would join you conspiracy nuts in exposing the truth about 911. All I need to do is see the black box with the serial numbers filed off. Where is it? I suppose a petition with 100,000 signatures would force its display by those who have it.

if you didnt see the black box to begin with, how can you possibly support any evidence provided by it?

And through all these replies, not ONE reply as to why the FBI would mysteriously withhold the serial numbers from the NTSB to hide the identities of the aircraft?

Who in the heck do you think you are fooling? There is no reason why those planes should not be identified.... Unless, of course, doing so would incriminate themselves, the government, Mossad/CIA, and everyone else involved.

Think about it. No reason. NONE.

Originally posted by TrueAmerican

2) The original aircraft were outfitted with remote control capability-
And then hijacked by a remote control pilot mid air. One theory has the hijackers being hijacked themselves. They could have been enticed by the CIA to pose as hijackers, with the up front plan to free them after landing- when really they intended to do exactly what happened.

If identified by FDR serial number, the maintenance records would potentially show these modifications.

I like that theory a lot. I wonder if there's any way of looking at the maintenance schedules of the crashed planes to see if anything suspicious pops up. Something taking an abnormally long time to fix on each plane or something strange that could have been a cover for the install of a remote control system

Originally posted by oldgoat
I wonder if there's any way of looking at the maintenance schedules of the crashed planes to see if anything suspicious pops up.

Lol, you seem to be missing the point. How can they look at the maintenance schedules when they cannot, or will not, conclusively identify the planes via the serial numbers on the FDR's!?!?

In other words, WHAT crashed planes?