It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by network dude
And when I made my comment about leaving if you didn't like it, I meant it. You do have that option. You also have the option to stay here and bad mouth the soldiers that protect you. The reason you have that option is because they make sure you can.
The commanding officer at the prison, Brigadier General Janis Karpinski, was demoted to the rank of Colonel on May 5, 2005. Col. Karpinski has denied knowledge of the abuses, claiming that the interrogations were authorized by her superiors and performed by subcontractors, and that she was not even allowed entry into the interrogation rooms.
The prisoner Manadel al-Jamadi died in Abu Ghraib prison after being interrogated and tortured by a CIA officer and a private contractor. The torture included physical violence and strappado hanging. His death has been labeled a homicide by the US military [7], but neither of the two men that caused his death have been charged. The private contractor was granted immunity.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Lawyers representing allegedly abused Iraqi prisoners filed suit in U.S. federal court Tuesday alleging killing, torture and other abuses against the prisoners or their family members in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. The lawsuit, filed by Iraqi Torture Victims Group (ITVG) on behalf of five Iraqis, names two U.S. companies, CACI International and the Titan Corporation, which were contracted by the U.S. government to provide interrogation services to coalition forces in Iraq.
Originally posted by dragonridr
Look Military personnel goes to jail looks like he took the fall for the contractor since they were granted immunity huh?
Originally posted by Damien_uk
Dont believe anything that is said by an emeny prisoner over one of your own soldiers!!
Id call the accused into the office ask them if they did it, if they said "no" that would be good enough for me.
The people making these claims would do far worse to you!
your right it proves nothing heres the worst part people are not even bothering to look where this information is comming from stated at a blog the new york times picked it up. The funniest part is no one has done any fact checking the allegations of rape were from the aclu back in 2004 someone reposted it word for word including the part were it said last week. Funny thing is last week was 2004 not 2009 its 5 years later strange huh.
Originally posted by jeddun
What does this prove?
I see a provocative thread title..i see RAPE emblazoned across the header and subsequent copy...yet no form of proof.
In what graphic image do we see a sexual organ touching anyone in any way shape or form? This is all BS.
Where was this copy lifted from?
What agency? (news) and how can we corroborate the names and identities of those 'quoted'?
Every other, i swear, every other thread i click on has one persons idea of what proof is....its all subjective yammering in my opinion.
Pleasse be sure to state QUITE clearly in thread title....
'My Personal Opinion Follows: blah blah blah'
...honestly
Originally posted by dragonridr
your right it proves nothing heres the worst part people are not even bothering to look where this information is comming from stated at a blog the new york times picked it up. The funniest part is no one has done any fact checking the allegations of rape were from the aclu back in 2004 someone reposted it word for word including the part were it said last week. Funny thing is last week was 2004 not 2009 its 5 years later strange huh.
Originally posted by jeddun
What does this prove?
I see a provocative thread title..i see RAPE emblazoned across the header and subsequent copy...yet no form of proof.
In what graphic image do we see a sexual organ touching anyone in any way shape or form? This is all BS.
Where was this copy lifted from?
What agency? (news) and how can we corroborate the names and identities of those 'quoted'?
Every other, i swear, every other thread i click on has one persons idea of what proof is....its all subjective yammering in my opinion.
Pleasse be sure to state QUITE clearly in thread title....
'My Personal Opinion Follows: blah blah blah'
...honestly
This is simply a case where people are pushing an agenda i have my theories as to why.But since i cant prove it for now let us say these accusations of sexual abuse are not new they are 5 years old and people are trying to make it look like a current topic. This was investigated and there is charges being brought to an independent contractor who is being accused of raping a boy. He was an interpreter hired not by the government but by a contractor to help them interrogate prisoners so much for there background checks.
Originally posted by UrsusMajor
Don't use the disgusting acts of a few as a soap-box for your anti-US propaganda.
Originally posted by UrsusMajor
This entire thread is a rant against what some idiots see as US imperialism. It has nothing to do with anything that happened in any prison. Read the posts. This thread is anti-US-foriegn-policy, nothing more, nothing less.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by UrsusMajor
Don't use the disgusting acts of a few as a soap-box for your anti-US propaganda.
I bet you will ignore this question of mine
But please point out any propoganda that I tried spreading please
Plz keep in mind the definition of propoganda as you look for such a post of mine with futility.
Originally posted by UrsusMajor
This entire thread is a rant against what some idiots see as US imperialism. It has nothing to do with anything that happened in any prison. Read the posts. This thread is anti-US-foriegn-policy, nothing more, nothing less.
This is untrue and you know it
read the first two posts you said
no YOU read it!
I said it many times that this was agenda and that was very much part of the article.
I don't think you even believe what you said
It's just that you have nothing else to say
I await for your reply regarding what posts I made that had a shred of propoganda in it
I doubt I will get a reply for that.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
good!
I will respond this is for sure
perhaps tonight though as it's time for me to go play some billiards with some buddies in a few.
But I will respond hopefully tonight.
Originally posted by UrsusMajor
Have a nice day, Yankee-hater.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by UrsusMajor
Have a nice day, Yankee-hater.
Is that really all you got? You belong on an episode of South Park, as one of the hillbillies screaming "they took our jobs!" and "if you don't like America, you can giiit out!!" Since you can freely call us all "hanoi janes" and "Yankee-haters", maybe we can call you "brainwashed bob" or maybe "rape-lover"? Since you're making ridiculous assumptions about our characters based on our opinions on US foreign policy, we can do the same, k?
You have a nice day as well, rape-lover.
Originally posted by UrsusMajor
I have no use for you.