Abu Ghraib abuse photos 'show rape', page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 31 times
Topic started on 28-5-2009 @ 09:25 AM by ModernAcademia

Abu Ghraib abuse photos 'show rape'


www.telegraph.co.uk
At least one picture shows an American soldier apparently raping a female prisoner while another is said to show a male translator raping a male detainee.

Further photographs are said to depict sexual assaults on prisoners with objects including a truncheon, wire and a phosphorescent tube.

Among the graphic statements, which were later released under US freedom of information laws, is that of Kasim Mehaddi Hilas in which he says: “I saw [name of a translator] ******* a kid, his age would
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.alertnet.org


reply posted on 28-5-2009 @ 09:25 AM by ModernAcademia
Among the graphic statements, which were later released under US freedom of information laws, is that of Kasim Mehaddi Hilas in which he says: “I saw [name of a translator] ******* a kid, his age would be about 15 to 18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn’t covered and I saw [name] who was wearing the military uniform, putting his **** in the little kid’s ***…. and the female soldier was taking pictures.”


Are there still people here on ATS that will say that they support the troops?

Is this what should really be the focus on memorial day?

Or do you all want your illusion of pride to remain?

Yes there are good troops as well, but they are still under a corrupt agenda nonetheless.

I'm sure the next video of pakistanis hitting a girl with a stick in Swat will create more anger than this will, because it's in the name of good if it's our troops doing it right?

This has been happening for so long and it seems it was used on purporse for interrogation techniques of some sort of just general oppression.

Was iraq an apartheid?

Support the troops right?
Let's keep that slave mentality
Let's keep hating on deserters with moral concsciousness.

Waterboarding was nothing compared to this.
That kid will be forever scared

And i'm sure this is only the tip of the iceberg

Hello Nazi Germany, we're not too far behind.

www.telegraph.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 28-5-2009 @ 10:30 AM by network dude
reply to post by ModernAcademia



I am with you on the point that we had no business in Iraq or even Afganistan (due to 9-11). But you hit a nerve when you blame the grunts for something the puppet master did. A soldier is a sodlier because he believes in something so much he is willing to die for it. He does what he is told and does it to the best of his ability. Courts are the ones who judge us here. God it the one who will judge us later. Since I am niether one of those, I try not to do it. I am willing to support our millitary people with my life the same as I took an oath to support my country with my life if nessesary. Blame the button pushers, not the soldiers.

edit to add:
I still dont think we had a reson to invade Iraq, but to say that there were no WMDs is just ludicris. Where did all the SCUD missles go? They were moved to the place the UN inspectors said they were not going to go. I don't know this for fact, but the common sense part of my brain says that Saddam didn't spend a bunch of time and money dismanteling his rocket infrastructure because W said so. The UN inspectors had to make a two week out appointment to view any facility. Pretty secret agenda don't ya think?

[edit on 28-5-2009 by network dude]



reply posted on 28-5-2009 @ 10:33 AM by network dude
reply to post by Dr Love



can you see the evidence through that pitch fork? If it's true, then you are right, if it's not, then you are a BIG part of the problem. If it's true, then these people, (all involved up to base commander) need to be tried and punished publicly. But if it's some propaganda made to rally the people against their troops, then maybe we should wait a bit before executing everyone wearing BDUs.


reply posted on 28-5-2009 @ 10:37 AM by jd140
reply to post by ModernAcademia



I still support my brothers and sisters. Believe me, we will not be harmed from your lack of support. Its like taking a grain of sand off the beach.

The loss is insignificant.

I haven't seen the picture of this happening nor have you. But as long as it claims some type of abuse it must be true, right?


reply posted on 28-5-2009 @ 10:46 AM by ModernAcademia
reply to post by jd140



For those saying that you haven't seen pics yet
the statement is almost irrelevant because your opinion will not change when/if the pics come out anyhow.

So what difference does/will it make?

This is a telegraph article, they interviewed people, but you want to see pics.

Ok fine, let's say you do. You will still support the same thing now right?'
So why even mention it?
Rape was an agenda, it wasn't a few bad apples!


reply posted on 28-5-2009 @ 10:52 AM by intrepid
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to
post by jd140



For those saying that you haven't seen pics yet
the statement is almost irrelevant because your opinion will not change when/if the pics come out anyhow.

So what difference does/will it make?


None to me. The General should be deemed credible.

Rape was an agenda, it wasn't a few bad apples!


Who's agenda?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^