It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Would you accept devastating Earth changes if ...?

page: 1

log in


posted on May, 28 2009 @ 01:39 AM
To complete the question in the subject, would you accept devastating Earth changes, events that will kill billions, if it provides the necessary stimulus to send Earth into a new dimension? I'm talking about an Earth minus the violence, poverty, and the exploitation by the elite scumbags.

Try to picture children you know, maybe your own children, dieing in a horrific way.

It's a horrible price to pay in order to transform Earth from a prison planet where evil rules in the big picture into a loving, free world.

I passionately want these changes to happen because I hate the way things are being run here, but then I think about the reality of how it will effect the innocent.

[edit on 28-5-2009 by droid56]

posted on May, 28 2009 @ 01:44 AM
reply to post by droid56

I don't see how a person could condone an "act" such as this, and then proceed into a "peaceful" dimension.

The loss of one life is sad enough, let alone the loss of billions. How many Einsteins, Mother Theresas and Ron pauls (
) would we lose with the extinction of so many individuals?

[edit on 28-5-2009 by TwiTcHomatic]

posted on May, 28 2009 @ 02:17 AM
The end does not justify the means

because the means is what the end is born from

therefore the means is the end.

[edit on 28/5/09 by Kailassa]

new topics

log in