It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by miriam0566
This seems too simplistic to me. There was more than one purpose or use of the Law. Just because there is one of them eliminated does not mean the law itself is eliminated.
In this case it is just a record. Once they are opened in this situation, they become exhibits of a court proceeding.
what is the book it speaks of? we dont know, it hasnt been opened yet. but we do know we will be judged according to the things in that book. likely this will be a new law.
Those who do not avail themselves of it will be judged by their works.
its by his sacrifice that we are saved. not by works.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
In this case it is just a record. Once they are opened in this situation, they become exhibits of a court proceeding.
Originally posted by miriam0566
every "law", because the law was no longer needed.
the mosaic law was set up so that man would understand the need for a saviour. man is imperfect, and they would have forgot that if they didnt have a standard to compare it too. if you want prove of this, just look at people today who live outside bible principles. "to err is to be human" as if it is only natural. "i am made the way god wanted me to be" they say to excuse personality flaws.
the mosaic law was to be a burden
gal 3:[13] Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
paul is quoting deuteronomy
21:[22] And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree:
[23] His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God that thy land be not defiled, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.
why is paul quoting deuteronomy? because the mosaic law condemns us to death. nobody can follow the law perfectly and therefore we all die.
it does not matter if you are mother theresa or ghandi or adolf hitler, we all grow old and die.
this is why paul said -
romans 5:[12] Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
[13] (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
[14] Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
the law makes us aware of our sin. that is its purpose. this is also why the law bore heavily the requirements of sacrifice. it shows us that we cant redeem ourselves but actually needed a saviour.
the animal sacrifices were to show us what was to come. animals are not worth human blood so no amount of animal sacrifice could redeem even one man, but they were symbolic of the ransom that was to be paid.
when jesus died, the ransom was paid soon after in the "spiritual temple". so if the law was to condemn us and jesus freed us from condemnation, then what need was there for the law?
the problem is that advocates for christians under mosaic law get "standards" and "laws" mixed up. someone says that we arent under the law and they flip out thinking that means we can go on this killing spree.
thats not what it means. killing for example was not ok back then nor is it now. the standards are still there and they are summed up by the 2 commandments jesus outlined.
however the formalities and traditions of the law were no longer needed. christians were no longer required to make sacrifices, or observe the sabbath, or abstain from certain foods. the covenant GOD made with the isrealites was finished. jesus made a new covenant.
instead of worshipping god through tradition and ignorance, now they worshipped him in spirit and in truth.
john 4:[22] Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
[23] But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.
[24] God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
Eternal death, and there is no payment, just punishment.
so let me get this straight. a man sins, and as a result is to die. his death pays for the sins he has committed, so he no longer has any debt.
If he is resurrected in the second resurrection, he was already deemed not worthy of being part of the first resurrection. So, in a sense, he has already been judged. In respect of actual justice, there are normal proceedings and evidence is allowed. Of course it is a forgone conclusion at this point. Again, the punishment is eternal death, and apparently that person did not accept the payment that was made for him by Jesus. There is no payment possible by the sinner because he has nothing to offer. The perfect Jesus did, but was at some point rejected as un-necessary by the person in this situation.
now god is going to resurrect him, and then judge him on the sins that he has already paid for?
if thats the case, why is it books and not book?
Originally posted by badmedia
Jesus made a difference between the laws of god, and the laws of men. The laws where it tells people to go do things, such as the examples you give are the laws and tradition of men. They came from misunderstandings of the proper way to follow the commandments. They thought that they were doing god's work when they killed the man who killed. But as Jesus points out, they were simply hypocrites. Vengence is mine sayeth the Lord. It is not their place to carry out the punishment.
This I completely disagree with. He brings understanding and is an example of how to walk the correct path. It is by following his example and walking that path that one is saved. Animal sacrifices were just another example of people not having a proper understanding, and that is what Jesus gives by fulfilling the law. Thus, why he is "the way".
A ransom? God doesn't have to pay a ransom. If he wanted to just forgive people, then he doesn't need to pay a ransom to do it, and he doesn't need to kill himself or his son in order to do it. However, the grace of Jesus would be that he is not full of sin and errors, so he doesn't have to be here. He knows full well what men will do in their sin to him, but he does it anyway just to be an example for people to follow. So that maybe you would see and understand and walk that same path.
But instead I'm too believe in ritualistic ideas like sacrifice and such? And that by washing in his blood I can be saved? Drop myself into some water in front of men in a ceremony to be baptized? Such is ritualistic. Not interested.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
If he is resurrected in the second resurrection, he was already deemed not worthy of being part of the first resurrection. So, in a sense, he has already been judged.
No pain, no gain.
im sorry, i cant go on. im getting a headache reading these posts (seriously)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
No pain, no gain.
That is one of these stupid sayings that might be meaningless, but I use it.
I realize that something about your religion does not allow for permanent death and everyone gets a second chance.
Originally posted by miriam0566
ok so this is sort of a random chapter i pulled out. this is god given instructions to moses. perhaps im ignorant of something but how exactly were the jews misunderstanding these
laws when they plainly say to put the offenders to death?
ok then,
matt 20:[28] Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.
jesus' own words, can you explain to me what he meant by this?
But instead I'm too believe in ritualistic ideas like sacrifice and such? And that by washing in his blood I can be saved? Drop myself into some water in front of men in a ceremony to be baptized? Such is ritualistic. Not interested.
matt 3:[16a] And Jesus, when he was baptized,....
can you explained to me then why jesus got baptized?
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
Matthew 28
19Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
20Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Hopefully someone will be challenged to blow the dust off their Bibles and crack it open. Then the Holy Spirit at least has a chance.
It is only by the holy spirit and understanding that anything I ever say will ever help anyone.
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." -- Galileo Galilei
Proverbs 8
1Doth not wisdom cry? and understanding put forth her voice?
2She standeth in the top of high places, by the way in the places of the paths.
3She crieth at the gates, at the entry of the city, at the coming in at the doors.
4Unto you, O men, I call; and my voice is to the sons of man.
5O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart.
6Hear; for I will speak of excellent things; and the opening of my lips shall be right things.
7For my mouth shall speak truth; and wickedness is an abomination to my lips.
8All the words of my mouth are in righteousness; there is nothing froward or perverse in them.
9They are all plain to him that understandeth, and right to them that find knowledge.
10Receive my instruction, and not silver; and knowledge rather than choice gold.
11For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things that may be desired are not to be compared to it.
12I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions.
13The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
14Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom: I am understanding; I have strength.
15By me kings reign, and princes decree justice.
16By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth.
17I love them that love me; and those that seek me early shall find me.
18Riches and honour are with me; yea, durable riches and righteousness.
19My fruit is better than gold, yea, than fine gold; and my revenue than choice silver.
20I lead in the way of righteousness, in the midst of the paths of judgment:
21That I may cause those that love me to inherit substance; and I will fill their treasures.
Originally posted by badmedia
I think your questions call all be answered in Hebrews 10.
Hebrews was only using that law about stoning as an example that if we reject Jesus and what he did for us, we will most assuredly be punished. He was not criticizing the law at all, only blasphemers against God and His Son.
even hebrew 10 is not agreeing with what you are saying.
Originally posted by miriam0566
Originally posted by badmedia
I think your questions call all be answered in Hebrews 10.
even hebrew 10 is not agreeing with what you are saying.
you said in so many words that the isrealites, who were doing what they were told to do, were misunderstanding. and that they were following the law of man.
yet this "law of men" that you point out came from god.
so how are they misunderstanding something that is told to them simply and plainly from god?
Originally posted by badmedia
]I guess the difference here is you would say the bible is the actual word of god, and I would say it isn't. At most one could say it is divinely inspired. Those laws were based on an inspiration, but that had a misunderstanding in it.
Their actions broke other commandments. Thou shall not kill. But if you kill someone because they sin, then you have broken that commandment yourself. Thus, vengeance is not ours, so it is not our place to carry out the punishment. As such, when you kill someone who kills, it's 2 sins, 2 mistakes not just 1.
Just because something says "god said", doesn't actually mean it was said by god. If it wasn't, then it's just a law of man. Again, the way to tell is based on the understanding Jesus gives. God is not a hypocrite, men are. And to say those laws are gods laws is to say God is a hypocrite.