Employer Faces Life Imprisonment For Paying Workers In Gold, Silver, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 37 times


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 12:17 PM by marg6043
reply to post by redhead57



He is been targeted because he is challenging the system, if everybody knows how to do that then the "system will collapse".



[edit on 27-5-2009 by marg6043]


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 12:19 PM by UFOTECH
I have studied this issue and this person for some time and followed this and other cases that he has been involved in. He fought them and won the first time. Now they come back after him for revenge and likely they are trying to make an example out of him to keep others from trying this. It is perfectly legitimate and if it ends up at the supreme court they will have to address the issue of the total devaluation of the money we have had to face.

Why is it that we are required to hold or even deal with a financial instrument that has no inherent value? They shoved this down our throats with this Federal Reserve act that was passed during the Christmas holiday when the congress was basically empty. If they tried some crap like this today it would cause a huge negative reaction and the phone lines at congress would melt down.

If you have a contract to be paid $50,000 in federal reserve notes for a year of work and in that year the Federal Reserve decides to devalue the money by 10% that same year does your contract get adjusted up to match? Not likely. The fact that they can make our currency worthless any time they like makes the dollar not worth taking in a fair trade for services.

On the other hand if you agree to be paid in gold and silver circulated currency and your contract is worth the same value or more if the FED descides to devalue the currency in that same year.

It just makes more sense to sign a year long contract in gold and silver than in Federal reserve debased fait money.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 12:24 PM by UFOTECH
reply to post by Doomsday 2029



As I said in my post this is an old story and he beat them the first time around so this is a revenge effort on the part of the IRS goons.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 12:30 PM by Freenrgy2
reply to post by Brothers



You can, but the very first thing a judge will tell the jury is not to listen to anything that isn't in the tax code. Even if you have evidence to the contrary, the judge will tell the jury to diregard that information.

There is no such thing as a fair trial in tax court.



reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 12:31 PM by Darthorious
Originally posted by UFOTECH
reply to
post by Doomsday 2029



As I said in my post this is an old story and he beat them the first time around so this is a revenge effort on the part of the IRS goons.


I thought you couldn't be tried in a court of law for the same crime twice?

Is this a new trial on a different tax return, or on the same original claim?


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 01:15 PM by Voxxrocks
Originally posted by Doomsday 2029
ISN"T THIS STORY OLD?

educate-yourself.org...




Regardless as to how old something might be, if it's the truth, it's worth repeating. Especially since we know membership around here has gone up considerably over the years and that new eyes are seeing these stories every day.

As a newbie to ATS myself, and those still rubbing the proverbial sand out of their eyes I'd like to say thanks for rehashing the info. It's not like it isn't still relevant.

Anywhere we find the name of one of us that stands up for all of us, that name should be known and that story told.

Since we know the truth of the statement that history does indeed hang the heroes, we should celebrate their victories of the heroes of our day, however minor or seemingly inconsequential, as our time will be the only time we can be assured homage is paid unto them.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 01:20 PM by RolandBrichter
reply to post by Doomsday 2029



Story source is dated May 26,2009..yes this has been going on a while, but the unfolding of his case is very relevant to current events...



[edit on 27-5-2009 by RolandBrichter]


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 01:59 PM by daddio
Has anyone here read the IRS Code USC 26?

If you are not an "elected official, government agent, military entity or any other government affiliated person", YOU DO NOT PAY TAXES.

Does anyone here make "Federal Income"? Then why oh why would you pay a "Federal Income Tax"?

Does anyone here make "State Income"? Then why oh why would you pay "State Income Tax."

If you are not required to file a Federal Income tax return, which most AMERICANS are not required too, then you do not file State Income Tax return either. By buying into this scam you have all, and I was at one time as well, screwed yourselves.

By putting your signature on ANY tax document you are authorizing the IRS and government to have authority OVER YOU!!!! I can not put it more plainly than that. Don't file, no problem, don't sign anything!!!!

Read the print at the bottom of a job application. It is an IRS document. You need not sign it to get a job. You also do not need to supply a Soc. Sec. number either. There are ways around it if you KNOW the LAW.

So why do people post their opinion and they have done absolutely no research into the subject matter. The Guy at the beginning story was perfectly within his right. I have met a shop owner, he's been in business 30+ years and has NEVER paid taxes, State or Federal. He knows the law and how to conduct his business to keep all matters legal and straight.

Think about the blacksmiths, the wagon builders, the carpenters and such back in the 1700's, the 1800's and early 1900's before the Federal Reserve was created, did they pay taxes? I very highly doubt it.

Come on here, a bit of common sense goes a very long way.


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 02:09 PM by Parallex
Folks - do some research on the registered language of 'LEGALESE'.

This is the language that lawyers, courts and judges speak. Learn this language, know how to defeat them at their own game. Courts are suffering defeats all over the world by people who know how to speak 'LEGALESE'. As long as you haven't broken 'common law' you should be fine. Statutes are the CONTRACTS that you can defeat.

I would explain more, but this site will do more than I can -
CLICK HERE - PLEASE BEAR IN MIND THE SPECIFIC RULES ON THIS SITE ARE FOR BRITISH LAW, BUT THE MAIN IDEA BEHIND IT IS USABLE GLOBALLY.

There is a good example in the US of a fellow fighting the IRS and winning regarding his mortgage. He argued that the money the banks lent to him was created out of thin air (under the fractional reserve system) and as such was not WORTH anything. Therefore it could not be taken as LEGAL CONSIDERATION as part of a LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. Therefore, the court had to rule the contract null and void, the house was still his, the mortgage annulled, and the bank left to foot the bill. If everyone started doing this - the system would collapse immediately. Just pure brilliance.

Also, note that LEGALESE only comes in capital letters - so it is easily recognisable when it is being used. Look at your car registration documents etc - most importantly your birth certificate to see examples of this language and its implications.

The Para.



reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 02:11 PM by RolandBrichter
reply to post by daddio




Bully for you!!

If you're indeed living this way,and not paying taxes or using your SSN, I highly encourage you to start a thread and show us all how exactly you did it....enlighten us, please...

I personally like the book 101 Things to Do 'Til the Revolution: Ideas and Resources for Self-Liberation, Monkey Wrenching and Preparedness by Claire Wolfe...

But I also personally know tax law "parsers" that talk as you do, yet are currently sitting in a federal pokey...


reply posted on 27-5-2009 @ 02:34 PM by RolandBrichter
reply to post by NightSkyeB4Dawn




I'm in your boat as well.....IRS became interested in my "day trading" activities in the 90's...I can't sneeze without those IRS iceholes handing me a tissue...I've had to forge my own way of "income retention"....but the truth is, if the IRS really wants to give you the monkeyhammer, there's no stopping them at this point in history...I would like that to change....by any means....as soon as possible
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



USDA Forces Whole Foods To Accept Monsanto
  Posted 12 days ago with 100 member flags
Greece wipes out Citizens Debt!! Tells Bankers to suck it
  Posted 13 days ago with 78 member flags
Obama on the verge of a deal with the banks
  Posted 18 days ago with 23 member flags
Bankers requesting that Greece become their debt slaves
  Posted 16 days ago with 15 member flags
We’re on the brink, warns Greece ahead of summit
  Posted 15 days ago with 15 member flags
Heard a rumor on a disreputable anarchist forum....
  Posted 17 days ago with 12 member flags