Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for SCOTUS, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 26-5-2009 @ 09:34 AM by FlyersFan
Wikipedia Biography
Princeton. Yale. DA office in NY.
Lecturer at Columbia Law. Board of Trustees at Princeton.

Good resume. But she's a racist. Perhaps even a sexist.
Personal feelings are NOT supposed to enter into judicial decisions.
Yet she proudly professes this is an asset and not a liability.
(wonder if she'd say that if the SCOTUS candidate leaned towards conservative feelings?)
Lady Justice is supposed to be blind. Remember the blindfold?

Michelle Malkin

-Judge Sotomayor’s personal views may cloud her jurisprudence. As Judge Sotomayor explained in a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider their “experiences as women and people of color” in their decisionmaking, which she believes should “affect our decisions.”


Sotomayor readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases. In a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she stated that she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider their “experiences as women and people of color,” which she believes should “affect our decisions.” She went on to say in that same speech “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her
experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.
” She reiterated her commitment to that lawless judicial philosophy at Duke Law School in 2005 when she stated that the “Court of Appeals is where policy is made.”


From one of her cases - Wiki

While on the Circuit Court, Sotomayor's most high profile case involved her voting that the civil right act of 1964 does hold that the city of New Haven may disregard the scores on a promotional test for firefighters because none of the highest scorers on the test were minorities. [38]


So much for a blindfolded Lady Justice.
White men don't know Constitutional Law as well as a Latina woman?
Poppycock.

edited immediately to fix ex


[edit on 5/26/2009 by FlyersFan]


reply posted on 26-5-2009 @ 10:27 AM by FlyersFan
reply to post by xxpigxx



Exactly. It isn't supposed to matter what color you are, what your gender is, or what you feel. It's supposed to be about the Constitution and upholding the law.

Like I said .. I wonder if she'd like it if a CONSERVATIVE person was on the bench and decided cases based upon his/her CONSERVATIVE views.






reply posted on 26-5-2009 @ 12:36 PM by xxpigxx
reply to post by notreallyalive



Uhh . . . the precident is the Constitution. Her life experiences should not be used to judge others. The Constitution should be used.



[edit on 26/5/2009 by xxpigxx]


reply posted on 26-5-2009 @ 01:24 PM by notreallyalive
reply to post by xxpigxx



so, in your opinion, what did the Constitution say about abortion before 1974?

The answer is it DIDN'T! Roe v Wade was a precedent setting case, fought over by how people interpret, with their personal experience, the factors of abortion. The constitution does not answer everything.


reply posted on 26-5-2009 @ 01:28 PM by loam


Another outrageous example of someone who has no intention of upholding the Constitution.

Is anyone really surprised?


reply posted on 26-5-2009 @ 01:32 PM by WhatTheory
Originally posted by loam


Another outrageous example of someone who has no intention of upholding the Constitution.

Is anyone really surprised?


Wow, after that statement, she should be barred from being a judge for the rest of her life. She is nothing but a liberal political HACK!


[edit on 5/26/2009 by WhatTheory]


reply posted on 26-5-2009 @ 01:35 PM by xxpigxx
reply to post by notreallyalive



At this juncture, I would say that it is up to the state, since it is not spelled out in the constitution.

If one were to be able to use the Decleration of Independance, though . . . which the courts do, and it is not even close to personal experience . . .

--We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--

Once a human is concieved (created) they are endowed with the right of life.



BUT, based on the Constitution, I would leave it up to the states.


reply posted on 26-5-2009 @ 02:24 PM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by notreallyalive
I personally don't want all my court justices to be white males (I'm a white male myself, by the way).

I want people who will uphold the CONSTITUTION .. I don't care what color or gender they are. From this womans statements, it is clear that the Constitution isn't foremost in her mind.

She should have a blindfold on like Lady Justice .. but instead she's coming across anti-white-male. And how exactly she's going to be able to be 'just' when she's that biased??? Who knows!

Originally posted by jd140
She won't be sworn in to the Supreme Court.

Betchya she gets in.

Obama wants SCOTUS with 'empathy'

What Obama wants

I think it's also important that this is somebody who has common sense and somebody who has a sense of how American society works and how the American people live.


And then he says this -

But you have to be able to stand in somebody else's shoes and see through their eyes and get a sense of how the law might work or not work in practical day-to-day living.


What the hell does that empathy have to do with the CONSTITUTION?
Not a damn thing.

Blog on this issue

When a person suggests that white men are less qualified for a job than Latina women, we call that racism and sexism. Apparently Sotomayor – and President Obama – call that “empathy.”


NY TIMES

Obama said, “I will seek someone who understands that justice isn’t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a casebook; it is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people’s lives.” That kind of judge, Obama explained, will have empathy: “I view the quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people’s hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes.”


Pay close attention here. According to Obama -
EMPATHY = JUST DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES


Lord help us! NO! NO! NO!
NO! The US Constitution = Just decisions and outcomes.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 187 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 11 hours ago, 105 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 74 replies