It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Scott Creighton
SC: That’s not quite accurate. I started out with a Precambrian ocean brimming with single celled organisms. I was seeking the point before these proto-organisms created the first plant(s) and animal life forms. I suggested that it was possible that such proto-organisms (i.e. more than one) could have evolved their own (similar but different) forms of life elsewhere on the planet that could – ultimately – have led to a lineage of intelligent species not unlike humans, developing elsewhere in parallel (or even long before our own lineage).
The main objection I think you have to such a scenario occurring is that we would see the precursor species in the fossil record even though you agree that the fossil record is incomplete. Who knows what fossils might be found under the Arctic or Antarctic ice when these areas were much warmer millions of years ago.
Originally posted by Byrd
No. I don't have that objection, actually. I'd have to find out what you meant by "intelligence", though. T-rex certainly was intelligent, as were ancient ammonites if by intelligence you mean the ability to sense the environment and make decisions.
If you mean "capable of having complex language with abstract ideas and capable of forming complex tools by combining many simple tools (a wagon created from wheels, axles, etc)" then I believe that humans are the only species (so far) to exhibit this kind of behavior.
And I certainly do not believe that any species native to the Americas ever evolved this type of behavior; certainly not within the past 1.5 million years.
[edit on 11-6-2009 by Byrd]
I think this is quite possibly the greatest insult to Native Americans I have seen. I sincerely hope that someday the hard evidence is found that shows people with this ideology once and for all just how wrong they are.
Wow their certainly seems to be an extreme lack of respect for Native Americans in this thread. I think this is quite possibly the greatest insult to Native Americans I have seen. I sincerely hope that someday the hard evidence is found that shows people with this ideology once and for all just how wrong they are.
PW: ...there's several pages of post by someone hanging on to the idea that humans evovled separately in the americas, an idea that has been thouroghly refuted.
Byrd: If you mean "capable of having complex language with abstract ideas and capable of forming complex tools by combining many simple tools (a wagon created from wheels, axles, etc)" then I believe that humans are the only species (so far) to exhibit this kind of behavior.
Originally posted by DangerDeath
Ancient people were much more aware of the importance of ethics, and they did not disappear because they were "outcompeted" by the more advanced humans. On the contrary, what we have now is the lowest point of human evolution, not its peak.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by DangerDeath
Ancient people were much more aware of the importance of ethics, and they did not disappear because they were "outcompeted" by the more advanced humans. On the contrary, what we have now is the lowest point of human evolution, not its peak.
Ethics? Does that include the part where they ate each other? There was no noble savage, and I'd say that in spite of all the wars and misery, the value of a human life has never been higher.
Originally posted by DangerDeath
People of today are eating each other as well. Eating each other is a technology of survival, isn't it?
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by DangerDeath
People of today are eating each other as well. Eating each other is a technology of survival, isn't it?
I'm referring to practices of eating each other for ceremonial purposes, or because they make a yummy snack...not out of necessity. Tell me it's not a matter of ethics, but it speaks to a certain skewed (skewered?...as in kabobs? ) measure of the man.
We may not look like it at times, but I still insist that this is closest the human condition has ever been to grace. There are dark sides to modern society, but on the whole we have never been more aware of universal human rights, and therefore a sense of brotherhood. I'd suggest, though, that this is the wrong discussion for this thread.
Originally posted by NephraTari
reply to post by Kandinsky
I understand.. the migration is exactly what I am arguing here. There are no stories or legends passed down that relate that we came here from another land. All of our stories put us here from the beginning. And being that we are still figuring out the scientific truths of the origins of man, and they are not yet solved beyond doubt, I have serious issue with the notion that modern man developed nearly everywhere but here. Everyday we make new discoveries and everyday we change what we know now, from what we knew yesterday.
As we learn more in time I believe you will find that we did not come here from some outside land. We have always been here.
Originally posted by amari
Other races will be found to have originated in the Americas along with the American Indian and I am not talking about the descendance of the Vikings, Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro. What I am talking about goes back 1.2 million years.